FAO Charlie

Charlie Reams · Post by **Charlie Reams** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:46 pm

lolcats. I forgot it was on and tuned in to see 3-0. Good times!

Jon Corby · Post by **Jon Corby** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:56 pm

The cursed Bale came on about an hour in, when it was 1-0. Heh heh.

Jon Corby · Post by **Jon Corby** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:15 pm

Ah, for fuck's sake. That was all my fault, wasn't it?

Charlie Reams · Post by **Charlie Reams** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:29 pm

Teehee!

Howard Somerset · Post by **Howard Somerset** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:38 pm

omg - not here as well.

I've been crying my eyes out on another forum for most of the evening.

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:52 pm

Jon, would you have started this thread if Jeff Stelling were not the host of Countdown?

Howard Somerset · Post by **Howard Somerset** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:33 pm

Jason Larsen wrote:Jon, would you have started this thread if Jeff Stelling were not the host of Countdown?

I'm quite sure he would've.

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:43 pm

Matt Morrison · Post by **Matt Morrison** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:51 pm

Jason Larsen wrote:Why?

You're underestimating the power of football in the UK Jason!
I assure you it's popularity has nothing to do with Jeff Stelling

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:32 pm

You all love football, don't you?

Matt Morrison · Post by **Matt Morrison** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:04 pm

Give or take a couple of million, yes.

Ian Volante · Post by **Ian Volante** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:09 pm

Jason Larsen wrote:You all love football, don't you?

Meh. I win money predicting results, I wouldn't call that love. Give me snooker any day.

Matt Morrison · Post by **Matt Morrison** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:14 pm

Ian Volante wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:You all love football, don't you?
Meh. I win money predicting results, I wouldn't call that love. Give me snooker any day.

The Masters was hands down the best snooker tournament I've seen for so long. The quality was consistently fantastic, and the final was a marvel. Ronnie is such a talent.

Jon O'Neill · Post by **Jon O'Neill** » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:33 pm

Matt Morrison wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:You all love football, don't you?
Meh. I win money predicting results, I wouldn't call that love. Give me snooker any day.
The Masters was hands down the best snooker tournament I've seen for so long. The quality was consistently fantastic, and the final was a marvel. Ronnie is such a talent.

Agree there, definitely.

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:02 am

Good!

Ian Volante · Post by **Ian Volante** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:34 am

Matt Morrison wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:You all love football, don't you?
Meh. I win money predicting results, I wouldn't call that love. Give me snooker any day.
The Masters was hands down the best snooker tournament I've seen for so long. The quality was consistently fantastic, and the final was a marvel. Ronnie is such a talent.

I missed it unfortunately. Ah well, not too long till the World Champs...

Les Butterworth · Post by **Les Butterworth** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:33 am

Jason Larson wrote You all love football, don't you?

A quote you may have heard Jason

“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.”

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:04 am

Jason Larsen wrote:You all love football, don't you?

That is quite simply, categorically and self-evidently untrue.

David Roe · Post by **David Roe** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:41 am

Wemberley, Wemberley,We're the famous Burnley FC and we're ... not going to Wemberley.

And I didn't even get to the game either. Off work with flu.

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:04 pm

So, just some of you love football!

Steven Tew · Post by **Steven Tew** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:50 am

is that the one with the round ball?

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:29 am

It always is!

Martin Gardner · Post by **Martin Gardner** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:04 pm

Jason Larsen wrote:So, just some of you love football!

I don't mind it, but I think it's actually quite slow and I can easily think of quite a few sports I'd rather watch. I've never really known why it's so popular, I think it's maybe down to the culture of the game rather than the game itself.

Junaid Mubeen · Post by **Junaid Mubeen** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:09 pm

Martin Gardner wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:So, just some of you love football!
I don't mind it, but I think it's actually quite slow and I can easily think of quite a few sports I'd rather watch. I've never really known why it's so popular, I think it's maybe down to the culture of the game rather than the game itself.

Not in my case. I largely despise the culture of the game but am simply in love with the game itself.

Jon O'Neill · Post by **Jon O'Neill** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:31 pm

There's definitely something sociological going on, because, like Martin says, there are better sports out there. Gaelic Football is probably my favourite sport in sporting value for money terms.

This sociological factor might explain why truly awful sports like baseball are popular in some parts of the world.

Jason Larsen · Post by **Jason Larsen** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:40 pm

Martin, are you satisfied with Jeff Stelling on Countdown?

Martin Gardner · Post by **Martin Gardner** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:27 pm

Jon O'Neill wrote:There's definitely something sociological going on, because, like Martin says, there are better sports out there. Gaelic Football is probably my favourite sport in sporting value for money terms.

This sociological factor might explain why truly awful sports like baseball are popular in some parts of the world.

Actually I'm a big Major League Baseball fan, and to be fair there are lots of moments where nothing is happening. Again I think it's more of a habit/routine thing than the sport itself, the fact I know all the players, what they look like, etc. And also it's the most (stupidly) statistical sport in the world, which is good for me... sort of.

Paul Howe · Post by **Paul Howe** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:19 pm

Football is taken seriously in all major European and South American countries, and has established itself in many parts of Africa and Asia, where it hasn't traditionally been part of the culture. It's even making inroads in the USA. I think the popularity of the game across such a wide swathe of humanity testifies to football's brilliance as a sport, both to watch and play. I actually think the culture of the game may alienate as many people as it attracts, in Britain at least.

Ian Volante · Post by **Ian Volante** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:18 pm

I'd say that (association) football has the advantage of simplicity to play at any level. That, added to the simple scoring system and basically simple gameplay which allows teams of wildly varying quality to compete with each other, is the secret of its success I reckon.

In terms of the amount of cheating, childishness and gamesmanship, it is possibly one of the worst sports however, but these things don't seem to dampen enthusiasm in general.

Paul Howe · Post by **Paul Howe** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:11 pm

Ian Volante wrote:I'd say that (association) football has the advantage of simplicity to play at any level. That, added to the simple scoring system and basically simple gameplay which allows teams of wildly varying quality to compete with each other, is the secret of its success I reckon.

Good point, all you need is a ball and bit of space and you're golden.

Ian Volante wrote:In terms of the amount of cheating, childishness and gamesmanship, it is possibly one of the worst sports however, but these things don't seem to dampen enthusiasm in general.

Sadly true of the upper echelons of the game, but you don't see much of that in the 5-a-side league I play in (and those that try it usually get a good kicking), so don't tar us all with the same brush!

Eoin Monaghan · Post by **Eoin Monaghan** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:06 pm

Kai Laddiman wrote:

.....are rubbish

Kai Laddiman · Post by **Kai Laddiman** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:15 pm

Eoin actually wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:
.....are brilliant

I agree with you there mate.

David O'Donnell · Post by **David O'Donnell** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:28 pm

Jon O'Neill wrote:There's definitely something sociological going on, because, like Martin says, there are better sports out there. Gaelic Football is probably my favourite sport in sporting value for money terms

Gaelic football is a great game to watch (I don't have great memories from when I had to play it though) but Hurling is immense!

Jon O'Neill wrote: This sociological factor might explain why truly awful sports like baseball are popular in some parts of the world.

My brother lives in the States and now loves this game; it doesn't appeal to me though.

Gavin Chipper · Post by **Gavin Chipper** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:29 pm

One of the main problems with football for me is that there are far too many subjective refereeing decisions that could go one way or the other, many of which directly result in a goal or stop a goal, which means that the game can hinge on these decisions. So it may be "exciting" that games are often decided by one goal, but the game isn't really precise enough for this. There would really need to be more goals per game to dilute the referee out of it. It would be like a qualifying session in F1 where the top few drivers are separated by a few thousandths of a second, but some guy is using his manual stopwatch to time them.

Also football teams are little more than religions as far as I can see. They are an arbitrary bunch of people that get support purely because of the name they are playing under. There's no substance to to these teams. Everything about a team could be swapped with another team (players, managers, grounds etc. are all transient) and yet people would still follow the name. Fair enough, if you like the game you will probably end up liking some teams more than others, and want one team to win overall, but it's the level that this is taken to (religious worship). I like F1 and want specific drivers to win but I have no particular obsession with any of them, and I find myself changing support from time to time. I can't relate to this football worship.

Martin Gardner · Post by **Martin Gardner** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:34 pm

Ian Volante wrote:I'd say that (association) football has the advantage of simplicity to play at any level. That, added to the simple scoring system and basically simple gameplay which allows teams of wildly varying quality to compete with each other, is the secret of its success I reckon.

In terms of the amount of cheating, childishness and gamesmanship, it is possibly one of the worst sports however, but these things don't seem to dampen enthusiasm in general.

I agree. I'd rather play football than watch it, though.

Ian Volante · Post by **Ian Volante** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:37 pm

Paul Howe wrote:Sadly true of the upper echelons of the game, but you don't see much of that in the 5-a-side league I play in (and those that try it usually get a good kicking), so don't tar us all with the same brush!

Oh I know, I play fives at work and apart from the occasional numpty, everyone plays fairly and the etiquette is great.

Michael Wallace · Post by **Michael Wallace** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:53 pm

Ian Volante wrote:
Paul Howe wrote:Sadly true of the upper echelons of the game, but you don't see much of that in the 5-a-side league I play in (and those that try it usually get a good kicking), so don't tar us all with the same brush!
Oh I know, I play fives at work and apart from the occasional numpty, everyone plays fairly and the etiquette is great.

Hmm, I hadn't checked this thread in a while, and in doing so just now I read this and wondered how we'd got on to talking about Eton Fives...

Ian Volante · Post by **Ian Volante** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:29 pm

Michael Wallace wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Paul Howe wrote:Sadly true of the upper echelons of the game, but you don't see much of that in the 5-a-side league I play in (and those that try it usually get a good kicking), so don't tar us all with the same brush!
Oh I know, I play fives at work and apart from the occasional numpty, everyone plays fairly and the etiquette is great.
Hmm, I hadn't checked this thread in a while, and in doing so just now I read this and wondered how we'd got on to talking about Eton Fives...

I've never played that particular type of fives. Some sort of group buggery against a wall isn't it? Or is that the Wall Game?