Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:31 pm
by Gavin Chipper
The geezer got 393 by doing 100×4-7.

Rachel started her 394 by doing 8/8. Just add it on to his!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:45 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
This is something she does a lot on Catsdown to avoid embarrassing the contestants.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:53 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Rhys Benjamin wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:45 pm This is something she does a lot on Catsdown to avoid embarrassing the contestants.
I think it's worse if anything and frustrating as it's left unresolved.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 4:13 pm
by Toby McDonald
PEDOGAMY in R4
BAILEYS/BEWAILS in R10

R3 Alt.: (((100+6)*7)+10)/2

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:42 am
by Howie Myers
r7 - HALOGEN
r8 - FORMITES

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 8:13 am
by Gavin Chipper
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:31 pm The geezer got 393 by doing 100×4-7.

Rachel started her 394 by doing 8/8. Just add it on to his!
At the risk of being told to apply to go on the show, I think this numbers game is a perfect example of how it's socially acceptable in this country to lack basic number skills by just saying "I've never been able to do maths" whereas not being able to read or write is not.

100, 8, 8, 4, 9, 7 -> 394

You'd struggle to find an easier one that both players failed to solve.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 4:30 am
by L'oisleatch McGraw
Gavin Chipper wrote: Fri Oct 23, 2020 8:13 am
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:31 pm The geezer got 393 by doing 100×4-7.

Rachel started her 394 by doing 8/8. Just add it on to his!
At the risk of being told to apply to go on the show, I think this numbers game is a perfect example of how it's socially acceptable in this country to lack basic number skills by just saying "I've never been able to do maths" whereas not being able to read or write is not.

100, 8, 8, 4, 9, 7 -> 394

You'd struggle to find an easier one that both players failed to solve.
I am glad that this round annoyed someone else as much as it annoyed me!
Rachel is usually someone who has my full respect.. but what the hell was she at with that pedantic solve? Just point out the open goal! He knows it, the viewers know it, it is actually patronising not to.

And while I'm in high dudgeon mode anyway...

GET ON THE F**CKING SHOW IMMEDIATELY.
HOW MANY MORE DECADES DO YOU PLAN TO WAIT???!!!!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 22nd October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 141)

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 11:10 am
by Philip Wilson
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 2:31 pm The geezer got 393 by doing 100×4-7.

Rachel started her 394 by doing 8/8. Just add it on to his!
I wasn't convinced Rachel saw it herself at first because at the start she was shown with her pad. But when Nick even linked to her by asking if she could find the missing 1, and then Rachel starting the solution by making the 1, it developed into a very strange few seconds!