Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Friday 21st August 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 97)

Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 1:22 pm
by Johnny Canuck
So VIRULENCE and AVIRULENT were no-gos, but VIRULENT made it on. Odd.

According to the chat page, the conundrum was redone because Sian gave a controversial answer (STATISTICS for STATISTIC). And then she was ruled wrong and Sian was asked to let David attempt the new conundrum alone. Can anyone else confirm this?

Re: Spoilers for Friday 21st August 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 97)

Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 9:03 pm
by Toby McDonald
OUTGO/OUTDO/ADOPT in R8

Re: Spoilers for Friday 21st August 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 97)

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:45 am
by Ian Fitzpatrick
Johnny Canuck wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2020 1:22 pm So VIRULENCE and AVIRULENT were no-gos, but VIRULENT made it on. Odd.

According to the chat page, the conundrum was redone because Sian gave a controversial answer (STATISTICS for STATISTIC). And then she was ruled wrong and Sian was asked to let David attempt the new conundrum alone. Can anyone else confirm this?
She did look a little disinterested!

Re: Spoilers for Friday 21st August 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 97)

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2020 9:54 am
by Howie Myers
just wondering, does anyone know whether there is an audience in the studio, or are they using "canned" applause?

Re: Spoilers for Friday 21st August 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 97)

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2020 10:47 am
by Sam Cappleman-Lynes
Howie Myers wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 9:54 am just wondering, does anyone know whether there is an audience in the studio, or are they using "canned" applause?
No studio audience, but the crew are told to applaud at appropriate moments.

Re: Spoilers for Friday 21st August 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 97)

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 1:02 pm
by James Robinson
CADUCEI in R4, SANDIVER in R10.

2nd Numbers Alt.: ((((6 + 1) x 3) + 50) x 10) + 2 = 712
3rd Numbers Alt.: ((50 + 7 + 5) x 10) + 1 = 621