Page 1 of 1

Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:37 pm
by Nial Mitchell
I’d like to just say that Ashton Hancock has been a decoy as part of a paedophile sting operation, the boy Ashton Hancock has assisted us in this and I’m now satisfied to give this forum a child suitable certificate.

This is a real boy who has been involved and he’s been working alongside us, we’d like to apologise for any stress caused by this operation, but we do perform them on various communities.

Thanks

Re: Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:49 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Sure.

Re: Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:49 pm
by Gavin Chipper
But the topic title is bang on.

Re: Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 5:04 pm
by Ben Wilson

Re: Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:42 pm
by Ronan M Higginson
Ben Wilson wrote: Sun Jun 07, 2020 5:04 pm https://youtu.be/DWfTilQo8fI

That is all.
:lol:

Re: Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:49 pm
by L'oisleatch McGraw
The question is:
Do we want to ban the entire Ashton Hancock collective*,
Or is it amusing / harmless enough that it doesn't warrant tough action?

(*Ashton, Martin, Callum, Maureen, Mark Nial... and probably others I've forgotten about)

Re: Spam

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:46 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
L'oisleatch McGraw wrote: Sun Jun 07, 2020 6:49 pm The question is:
Do we want to ban the entire Ashton Hancock collective*,
Or is it amusing / harmless enough that it doesn't warrant tough action?

(*Ashton, Martin, Callum, Maureen, Mark Nial... and probably others I've forgotten about)
Have you looked at the wiki lately? Not only have they had at least 100 wiki accounts, but they break and move pages willy-nilly.