Page 1 of 1

Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:50 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Is there anyone on here (apart from me) who is considering going on the show soon?

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:50 pm
by Jon Corby
Amey Deshpande is back on again in Series 60, so I hear.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:57 pm
by Jacob Sutton
I'm considering applying for the show towards the end of next year or so, although judging by my recent Apterous form I shouldn't really bother :oops:

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:10 pm
by Ben Hunter
Jacob Sutton wrote:I'm considering applying for the show towards the end of next year or so, although judging by my recent Apterous form I shouldn't really bother :oops:
That's what I thought at first, but you will improve.

Think I'm gonna apply for series 61.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:23 pm
by Jimmy Gough
When I have an apterous rating at about 800 (if that ever does happen).

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:58 am
by Innis Carson
I plan on going for it some time next year when I've moved out. Might be in series 61 if I'm lucky.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:36 pm
by Ian Volante
Jimmy wrote:When I have an apterous rating at about 800 (if that ever does happen).
As far as I can tell, anyone with a rating of over 500 has the talent to make serious inroads into the knockout stages. Don't make the mistake of one of my mates who waited for just another year to get that bit better before going onto 15-to-1 and then missed out on it entirely...

Admittedly there's less chance of that happening for CD however.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:37 pm
by Ian Volante
Jon Corby wrote:Amey Deshpande is back on again in Series 60, so I hear.
Argh, don't keep reminding me of my failure :(

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:42 pm
by Oliver Garner
Still thinking of applying. Want an Apterous rating over 500 though.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:44 pm
by Jason Larsen
If I lived in England, I definitely would apply!

I would be the second wheelchair-bound (and second American-born) contestant on the show!

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:13 pm
by Howard Somerset
I think I need an apterous rating to match my age ... in months.

Unfortunately, it's much more likely to match my age in years.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:19 pm
by Charlie Reams
Howard Somerset wrote:Unfortunately, it's much more likely to match my age in years.
Whatever do you mean? 582 would be quite a good rating!

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:06 pm
by Howard Somerset
Charlie Reams wrote:
Howard Somerset wrote:Unfortunately, it's much more likely to match my age in years.
Whatever do you mean? 582 would be quite a good rating!
:lol:

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:36 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jason Larsen wrote:If I lived in England, I definitely would apply!

I would be the second wheelchair-bound (and second American-born) contestant on the show!
You do realise you'd have to pass an audition, Jason, which involves getting lots of 7s etc - it's not just a case of "apply and you'll be a contestant"

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:05 am
by Jason Larsen
Thank you, Kirk!

I didn't realize you would have to pass an audition. I guess it's not enough to just impress all the staff and try to give them a lot of good things in return.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:23 am
by Joseph Bolas
Jason Larsen wrote:Thank you, Kirk!

I didn't realize you would have to pass an audition. I guess it's not enough to just impress all the staff and try to give them a lot of good things in return.
Yeah. In fact I even posted my audition (from 2003) in here back in March :)

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:48 am
by Jason Larsen
You know, Joseph, I like you. The Countdown staff must have liked you and then some!

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:45 am
by Joe Denniss
What's the ruling on going on Countdown twice? I thought it was a big fat no, but I've been confused since I discovered that Junaid had been on before...

EDIT: Why am I on here when I could be in bed while Santa delivers my pressies? :roll:

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:52 am
by Jason Larsen
Joe, I was surprised to hear that too!

As far as I know, unless there's a technical difficulty on any other game show the only game show you can appear on twice in the US is The Price is Right.

And yes, I haven't forgotten you're 14! As the song implies, Santa Claus only sees you when you're sleeping!

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:21 pm
by David Roe
If a tiny tot (like Kai) goes on the show, and loses (not like Kai!), they might have him back when he's grown up. No other exemptions as far as I know.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:53 pm
by Ben Wilson
Joe Denniss wrote:What's the ruling on going on Countdown twice? I thought it was a big fat no, but I've been confused since I discovered that Junaid had been on before...

EDIT: Why am I on here when I could be in bed while Santa delivers my pressies? :roll:
I think you have to have been young and lost your first show, or lost your first show narrowly to a top player- like Terry Rattle did against Chris Wills, before being let back on a second time, and again losing to an octochamp.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:06 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Ben Wilson wrote:
Joe Denniss wrote:What's the ruling on going on Countdown twice? I thought it was a big fat no, but I've been confused since I discovered that Junaid had been on before...

EDIT: Why am I on here when I could be in bed while Santa delivers my pressies? :roll:
I think you have to have been young and lost your first show, or lost your first show narrowly to a top player- like Terry Rattle did against Chris Wills, before being let back on a second time, and again losing to an octochamp.
Are there any other examples of the Terry Rattle situation or was that a one-off? Also it does sem a bit strange that you have to lose your first game. Had some 8-year-old scraped through and won one game and then lost horribly that would be that? Whereas had he lost his first game it would be fine for him to come back a few years later?

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:00 pm
by Jason Larsen
That's nice of the staff!

I'm not sure how long they've been that nice, though.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:38 pm
by Martin Gardner
Jason Larsen wrote:If I lived in England, I definitely would apply!

I would be the second wheelchair-bound (and second American-born) contestant on the show!
I didn't know you were in a wheelchair, although are you sure that only one wheelchair bound person has been on the show? I think I've seen at least two (a friend, Patricia Pay is one, I assume she was already in a wheelchair in 1995).

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:39 pm
by Charlie Reams
Gavin Chipper wrote: Are there any other examples of the Terry Rattle situation or was that a one-off?
Junaid, Amey Deshpande and James Squires all appeared twice with the blessing of the producer. Saladin Khoshnaw appeared twice, first under his own name (reaching one win) and then again under the name Karl Kurdistan, but I believe his deception was discovered. Two people with the name Ola Odutola have appeared (losing to Jono on the latter occasion) and no one seems to know if it was the same guy or not, but I suspect it was.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:55 pm
by Jason Larsen
Martin, I know Frank Larkin is in a wheelchair, too.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:03 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Charlie Reams wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote: Are there any other examples of the Terry Rattle situation or was that a one-off?
Junaid, Amey Deshpande and James Squires all appeared twice with the blessing of the producer. Saladin Khoshnaw appeared twice, first under his own name (reaching one win) and then again under the name Karl Kurdistan, but I believe his deception was discovered. Two people with the name Ola Odutola have appeared (losing to Jono on the latter occasion) and no one seems to know if it was the same guy or not, but I suspect it was.
Cheers. Actually by "Terry Rattle situation" I meant specifically someone that had got back on through a high losing score rather than through age etc.

Speaking of Saladin Khoshnaw I remember reading recently that he had died and in his "obituary" that appeared somewhere, he was actually asked back on as the producer wanted more ethnic minority players (a racist producer!) rather than being his deception. I can't remember where I read it, but have found this: http://osdir.com/ml/games.scrabble.sowp ... 00022.html which might be word-for-word the same as what I read but I don't recognise the actual look of the page.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:37 pm
by Jason Larsen
The producers try to be nice regardless.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:17 pm
by Matthew Green
Plus that guy (Carl something?) in s57 who's opponent cheated so he came back for another attempt in s58. Is this the only case of this happening?

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:34 pm
by Mike Brown
Another example of the same contestant appearing twice may be Garry Preston from Eccles, who may have been in both Series 18 and 59 - some 19 years apart!

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 8:25 pm
by Martin Bishop
Mike Brown wrote:Another example of the same contestant appearing twice may be Garry Preston from Eccles, who may have been in both Series 18 and 59 - some 19 years apart!
I was just about to say that. He was on as the standby after I won my eighth game. He lost on a crucial conundrum both times. I sat with him in the audience for the final show of the day. He's a nice man and was good enough to have won a few games, if he hadn't been so nervous.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:15 pm
by Junaid Mubeen
When I was on in 1998, there was a contestant in the game before mine called Alex Davis who was making his second appearance as a challenger in 6 months. If I recall correctly he was allowed on again because he'd ever so slightly mispronounced the crucial conundrum PROBOSCIS. He also lost second time round.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:02 am
by Joe Denniss
Well I'll give it 10 years and a name change and I'll be back.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:51 am
by David Roe
An identical twin might be useful. Real or imaginary. ;)

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:48 am
by Jimmy Gough
Or a sex change. I wonder if they've ever had a transsexual on countdown. I'd guess not.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:28 am
by Jason Larsen
Matthew, you're thinking of Carl Dundas, who reminds some of us of Jeffrey Hansford.

But, he hasn't been invited back since Series 57.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:55 am
by Dan Vanniasingham
It seems Matthew is referring to Carl Dundas, Jason, at least according to the wiki. He was invited back to compete in series 58.

I think you may be referring to Dundas Keating as the contestant with (partial) similarities to Jeffrey Hansford.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:58 am
by Jason Larsen
I really think Matthew was talking about Carl, Dan.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:59 am
by Dan Vanniasingham
I really don't know why I bother, Jason.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:19 am
by Jimmy Gough

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:28 am
by Dan Vanniasingham
Ohh I see! I thought Jason meant Carl possessed similar disability-traits to Mr Hansford, but he was referring to his cheating on the conundrums. Fair enough!

I blame his "...but he's not been seen since S57" comment for throwing me off the scent, as well as something else. In any event - why do I bother?!

At least I've succeeded in implying Dundas Keating was a bit special. :|

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:39 am
by Jason Larsen
I meant to imply both, Dan. Carl Dundas is another one-of-a-kind contestant.

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:45 am
by Dan Vanniasingham
You did? Well you thoroughly confused me then (which isn't hard admittedly). I can't remember Carl at all, although I remember the furore last year which led to him being invited back. I'll just agree he was a "one-of-a-kind" type anyway. ;)

Out of interest, Jason, did you think Dundas Keating was the same (if you remember him)?

Re: Series 60/61 Wannabes

Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:20 am
by Jason Larsen
I barely remembered Dundas Keating!