Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13317
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Method for first nums for the 4 largers:
((100+6)*3*75+50)/25
Well in time as well, though really it's just standard 4l stuff.
((100+6)*3*75+50)/25
Well in time as well, though really it's just standard 4l stuff.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
CASUIST in one of the early rounds.
And, after what I posted in another thread about learning to do one large,
(100-4) x (5+1) + 3 = 579
as a straightforward contestant beater. Just the 10 points each wasted today.
And, after what I posted in another thread about learning to do one large,
(100-4) x (5+1) + 3 = 579
as a straightforward contestant beater. Just the 10 points each wasted today.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Ragwort was available in that round I think.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:14 pm ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it.