Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:01 pm
by Tony Atkins
The show is over and no spoiler thread? Everyone else must be at the finals!

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:02 pm
by Tony Atkins
Well out of time for last numbers (50x100+4)/(2x(75/25))=834

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:08 pm
by Tony Atkins
I am told there is 9 available in round 1, but otherwise I think only alts - eg DUPPIES for YUPPIES.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:23 pm
by Johnny Canuck
Tony Atkins wrote:I am told there is 9 available in round 1, but otherwise I think only alts - eg DUPPIES for YUPPIES.
Close -- one other beater, which I believe is a new word, in the MIKADOS/DAIKONS round.

Two Ks today. Kooky.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:26 pm
by szodiac
Hugo Newell did WELL ENOUGH yesterday but not today :-)

Mauro

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:43 pm
by samir pilica
R1 RESULTANT

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:57 pm
by Gavin Chipper
A bit out the time but last numbers was (100×50+4)/2×25/75=834.

Edit - just seen that Tony got it.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:00 pm
by Gavin Chipper
In the third numbers, geezer could have done 651-13 to get 638 rather than 651-25+13 to get 637.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday April 6th 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 48)

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 6:39 pm
by James Robinson
Johnny Canuck wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:I am told there is 9 available in round 1, but otherwise I think only alts - eg DUPPIES for YUPPIES.
Close -- one other beater, which I believe is a new word, in the MIKADOS/DAIKONS round.

Two Ks today. Kooky.
Three actually, as we had Karen Pearson answering the conundrum at the end. 8-)