Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:45 pm
by Steven M. McCann
Bloody hell! David's having a nightmare.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:52 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Superb ton debut, well done Paul. :)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:16 pm
by Tony Atkins
Trust Rachel to have another method to show rather than completing the 14x51+10 method.

Well done to Paul. Tought he was going to max the game, but 13 max is pretty hot.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:36 pm
by James Robinson
Tony Atkins wrote:Trust Rachel to have another method to show rather than completing the 14x51+10 method.

Well done to Paul. Thought he was going to max the game, but 13 max is pretty hot.
Yeah, ridiculously great standard by Paul. I almost thought David was going to unfortunately break the low-scoring record for a champion outside of a series finals, but that last numbers game saved him there.

PAGEANT in round 12 as an alternative.

1st Numbers Alt.: (((50 x 2) + 8) x 7) + 6 = 762

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:39 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Tony Atkins wrote:Trust Rachel to have another method to show rather than completing the 14x51+10 method.
Both contestants could have got there. 8×9×10+9×6-50=724.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:53 pm
by Philip Wilson
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:Trust Rachel to have another method to show rather than completing the 14x51+10 method.
Both contestants could have got there. 8×9×10+9×6-50=724.
Yeah that was my way but then I realised it was basically RRs method too except she just did some split multiplication and saved herself a 9. It was the only round I won too :-)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:05 pm
by Johnny Canuck
Tony Atkins wrote:Well done to Paul. Thought he was going to max the game, but 13 max is pretty hot.
Was it not 12 maxes? (Still way better than I usually do on Apterous, even with an optimal blood alcohol content.)
James Robinson wrote:Yeah, ridiculously great standard by Paul. I almost thought David was going to unfortunately break the low-scoring record for a champion outside of a series finals, but that last numbers game saved him there.
I think he still does have The Record in the new 15-round format.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 18th February 2016 (Series 74 Prelim 19)

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:07 pm
by Tony Atkins
Johnny Canuck wrote:Was it not 12 maxes? (Still way better than I usually do on Apterous, even with an optimal blood alcohol content.)
Seems there is a beater in RIVALISE not reported here (which is one of those "new" words), so 12 max.