Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:04 am
by James Robinson
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 12:51 pm
by Zarte Siempre
I prefer George's.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:21 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
1st nos:
(50+4-1) x (100/25)
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:25 pm
by Gavin Chipper
PEATLAND in round 4.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:26 pm
by Steven M. McCann
Call me cynical, but I think Sian only queried the correct spelling of RANDOMISE/RANDOMIZE so everybody would know she had got it by herself and hadn't cribbed off Susie.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:39 pm
by Tony Atkins
Anyone get 553? Lots of ways to a miserable 560....
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:54 pm
by Tony Atkins
Couple of beaters available one in each of the RASPER and SEEKS rounds.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:55 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Tony Atkins wrote:Anyone get 553? Lots of ways to a miserable 560....
I got 557 using the standard method in the time but haven't tried beyond that.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 3:41 pm
by Zarte Siempre
If 553 was the one away 6 small, then I got it at the time, but can't remember what the numbers were now. It was basically 79*7 though.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:45 pm
by Jon Corby
Steven M. McCann wrote:Call me cynical, but I think Sian only queried the correct spelling of RANDOMISE/RANDOMIZE so everybody would know she had got it by herself and hadn't cribbed off Susie.
I'll go for "gullible" or "naive" instead of "cynical" then, if that's okay. There's no fucking way on earth she got that on her own, and I can't see why you'd think that from her pathetic bit of acting. If she's literally the last person available in future and gets booked again, can Susie also write down how many letters there are in each word so we don't have to watch her count them ffs. Awful guest, absolutely clueless as to how to play it.
Re: Spoilers For Monday November 10th 2014
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:26 pm
by Philip Wilson
She was annoying, but not as bad as some guests who can't read SD's writing and offer words that aren't even in the selection, leading to SD reaching over and writing it more clearly for them! That's just funny

I just think guests should play along for themselves, like Gyles B, John Parrott, Graham Cole [the cop], and others I forget who haven't appeared for a long time, but that's a topic for elsewhere I guess.