Page 1 of 1
Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:52 pm
by Jordan F
Roy Taylor won again, and now is the only person that can possibly steal a finals spot from Andy Gardner. But first, he'd need a third win. Can he get it?
Join James for the recap later.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:10 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
Possible blooper in TREMOLO round.
Rachel put up the letters TREMELO.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:20 pm
by Phyl Styles
I'm with Mark on that one, unless an alternative spelling has been recently allowed
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:28 pm
by Tony Atkins
I would hope Myleene knew how to spell it if Rachel didn't.
There were two 8s in that round anyway - sadly I missed both and stuck at ROOTLED.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:53 pm
by szodiac
Did Pad (the challenger) find a flaw in the conundrum?
Having declared INCORRECT and the solve was shown as INCORRECT (like they normally have done) would he have got the points for being correct?
Daughter Jessica was happy with her alt spot of DIASPORE in the PARODIES round although two CSW words crept into her declarations today.
Mauro
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:59 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Someone who missed the show wrote:I missed the show. Who won?
We all did. It was Myleene's last game.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:01 pm
by Gavin Chipper
szodiac wrote:Did Pad (the challenger) find a flaw in the conundrum?
Having declared INCORRECT and the solve was shown as INCORRECT (like they normally have done) would he have got the points for being correct?
He did well there. I think it's been discussed on here before that someone could do that. Also I like the way he mocked the whole forced "Hello Rachel" thing at the start. Pity he lost!
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:50 pm
by Martin Thompson
Tony Atkins wrote:I would hope Myleene knew how to spell it if Rachel didn't.
There were two 8s in that round anyway - sadly I missed both and stuck at ROOTLED.
RETOOLED was one, I think.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:47 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Further to yesterday, the contestants' methods for 270 suggested that they were at full stretch.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:10 pm
by James S Roper
Gavin Chipper wrote:szodiac wrote:Did Pad (the challenger) find a flaw in the conundrum?
Having declared INCORRECT and the solve was shown as INCORRECT (like they normally have done) would he have got the points for being correct?
He did what I was hoping nobody would until I went on
but no, although it exposes a flaw.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:02 pm
by Graeme Cole
You heard it here first.
More contestants like Pad, please.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:15 pm
by James Robinson
1st Numbers Alt.: ((9 x 8) - 25) x (10 - 1) = 423
DIASPORE in round 12 and GECKOS in round 13.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday June 4th 2014 (S70 P95)
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:36 pm
by Philip Wilson
Gavin Chipper wrote:szodiac wrote:Did Pad (the challenger) find a flaw in the conundrum?
Having declared INCORRECT and the solve was shown as INCORRECT (like they normally have done) would he have got the points for being correct?
He did well there. I think it's been discussed on here before that someone could do that. Also I like the way he mocked the whole forced "Hello Rachel" thing at the start. Pity he lost!
Also I like the way he scrutinised Roy's paper when he discovered he did 270 the same way! Seeing there were several methods I'd say the chances of both doing it the same way were quite remote.
