Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Sean Fletcher's at win number 6. If he can score at least 47 points today, he will also definitely be in the finals. Can he do it? I know apterite Samir Pilica is supposed to be coming soon, and for some reason I think it could be today (he mentioned a date to me but I only have a vague recollection of it). So maybe it'll be today, I don't remember. Whether it's him or not, enjoy Sean.
Join James for the recap later.
Join James for the recap later.
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
It is indeed Samir - rated currently in the 1300s on Apterous - shame he missed the first numbers.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Did Sean knowingly fish for the E in R7? No he has 6 obviously not.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Managed 24x20 to make 480, but the computer can make 486 (1 away).
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
JUVIES+S gives an obscure 7 In R12.
Sean's final losing sigh makes me think he must be a Julia Bradbury fan and sad to be missing her on the next show!
Looking forward to seeing more of Samir though.
Sean's final losing sigh makes me think he must be a Julia Bradbury fan and sad to be missing her on the next show!
Looking forward to seeing more of Samir though.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Well done to Samir, solid start and we'll see how he goes.
Shame for Sean, I think he would have won had he got the 9, so close game, and we'll see him again in the finals.
Shame for Sean, I think he would have won had he got the 9, so close game, and we'll see him again in the finals.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
I got that in the round. JUSSIVE for 7.Tony Atkins wrote:JUVIES+S gives an obscure 7 In R12.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:33 pm
- Location: Southend-on-Sea via Burnley
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
If I've remembered the selection correctly it was 2+1Tony Atkins wrote:Managed 24x20 to make 480, but the computer can make 486 (1 away).
then ((7x4)-1)x6x3
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
I just snook to 490 in that one.Tony Atkins wrote:Managed 24x20 to make 480, but the computer can make 486 (1 away).
A very good début by Samir there, again knew he was coming on soon, but couldn't remember when...........
LOAMIER/LOATHER in round 8.
1st Numbers Alt.: (((75 x 4) - 6) x 3) + 7 = 889
2nd Numbers Alt.: (75 + 5 + 5 - 1) x 4 = 336
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13317
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
I missed today's game, but I thought his standard had slipped over the last couple of days. Had he lost his first game, he's definitely someone who people would have said "He would have been an octochamp but was unlucky" about, and I might have agreed, but it's difficult to tell someone's standard from a single game. Quite a few people have lost their only game in a close contest against a future octochamp and people say that about them, but I think in man cases they would not have performed at that level thereafter.Jordan F wrote:Shame for Sean, I think he would have won had he got the 9, so close game, and we'll see him again in the finals.
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Surprised Rachel didn't declare or show a method within 10 for the 487 round - I got 480 pretty easily within the time.
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Despite what Nick said, I'd be surprised if we see Sean back for the finals in June.
If somebody's got his number I think they should go check on him...
If somebody's got his number I think they should go check on him...
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday May 21st 2014 (S70 P85)
Yup, 480 here first, then found 490 out of time after realising that (6+1)x7 is one more than (7+1)x6James Robinson wrote:I just snook to 490 in that one.Tony Atkins wrote:Managed 24x20 to make 480, but the computer can make 486 (1 away).