Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:48 pm
by Jordan F
Priscilla Munday is continuing to win, racking up 5 so far. A 6th could put her close to the number 1 seed. Can she do it?

Join Callum for the recap later.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:17 pm
by Bradley Cates
CEPHALON in R1

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:21 pm
by Tony Atkins
Bradley Cates wrote:CEPHALON in R1
WD - I got pinochle and I think there are at least 3 other 8s there.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:23 pm
by Tony Atkins
The computer agrees with Rachel that 998 is impossible.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:31 pm
by Tony Atkins
Hurrah for the 3 large T selection but boo to the three small ones there. I managed 546 but 531 is actually the nearest.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:32 pm
by Fred Mumford
Tony Atkins wrote:The computer agrees with Rachel that 998 is impossible.
And can only get within 7 on the next game.

It's going to be a low max score if no nines turn up.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:34 pm
by Bradley Cates
GOURAMI in R7

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:37 pm
by Andy Platt
Weird discrepancy between how easy the numbers were yesterday and how hard they are today.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:38 pm
by Bradley Cates
3 impossible numbers rounds. Blimey. Has that ever happened before?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:39 pm
by Tony Atkins
I managed 517 but 514 is best. I did have a 3L the other day that you couldn't get within 10 even, so it could be worse.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:40 pm
by Fred Mumford
Bradley Cates wrote:3 impossible numbers rounds. Blimey. Has that ever happened before?
I don't know, but bearing in mind that they haven't gone for 6 small or 4 large it's even more remarkable.

Overall, aren't about 94% of games solvable? Gut feel says that means it probably has happened before, but obviously not very often.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:44 pm
by Tony Atkins
DIRTIEST alt to DISTRICT

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:53 pm
by Tony Atkins
Hurrah for a possible numbers - 14 max game today (missed GOURAMI) - well pleased.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:54 pm
by Zarte Siempre
Imperfect max game for me. Had 517 instead of 514 on R9, but in terms of points, a max game :)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:07 pm
by Fred Mumford
Fred Mumford wrote:It's going to be a low max score if no nines turn up.
112 according to Callum's recap - comfortably a new record since the last format change, beating the series 68 final by 3 points.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:10 pm
by Graeme Cole
Bradley Cates wrote:3 impossible numbers rounds. Blimey. Has that ever happened before?
Until today, no game has had more than two numbers rounds where it was impossible to get 10 points.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:32 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Zarte Siempre wrote:Imperfect max game for me. Had 517 instead of 514 on R9, but in terms of points, a max game :)
Tony's 14-max was only a 12-max by the looks of things as well.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:45 pm
by James Robinson
Zarte Siempre wrote:Imperfect max game for me. Had 517 instead of 514 on R9, but in terms of points, a max game :)
Same for me, except I got 512 in R9, as I did (1 + 1) x 8 x 8 x 4. :P

PASEOS in round 12, which I learnt off Kirky on Sunday at The Hangover. 8-) :geek: :ugeek:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:27 am
by Philip Jarvis
I was pleased to spot GOURAMI again. :lol:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:17 am
by David Williams
Tony Atkins wrote:The computer agrees with Rachel that 998 is impossible.
No computers on Countdown. None at all. Never have been. Never will be.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:24 am
by Fred Mumford
I thought it was well established that Rachel gets told if a game is impossible. What she never gets fed is solutions to solvable games.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:38 am
by David Williams
One or both of Tony and I was trying to be a bit subtle here. The computer didn't agree with Rachel pronouncing that 998 was impossible. Rachel may have thought it was impossible, but it was the computer alone that established it definitely.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday January 28th 2014 (S70 P17)

Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:31 am
by Ryan Taylor
David Williams wrote:One or both of Tony and I was trying to be a bit subtle here. The computer didn't agree with Rachel pronouncing that 998 was impossible. Rachel may have thought it was impossible, but it was the computer alone that established it definitely.
Only one. And you weren't subtle.