


Bearing in mind this is the Sun, perhaps it's as well they don't have any archive photos?Jon Corby wrote:Where are the pictures of Rachel?
But since Marcus du Sautoy isn't going to be retiring any time soon, she'll have to settle for doing Countdown instead.Junaid Mubeen wrote:As for Rachel: "There’s only one cool maths job around..." - so true.
Hehe, when I heard it was going to be a blonde bombshell from Oxford I could only think of du Sautoy, but thankfully not.Jennifer Turner wrote:But since Marcus du Sautoy isn't going to be retiring any time soon, she'll have to settle for doing Countdown instead.Junaid Mubeen wrote:As for Rachel: "There’s only one cool maths job around..." - so true.
The Sun is so useful."She was tested on her maths skills and abilities in front of the camera before being offered the part."
Jon Corby wrote:Where are the pictures of Rachel?Damian E wrote:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sh ... 957136.ece
Hahaha, yesDan Vanniasingham wrote:"Unbelievable Jeff - there's a 9!"
Mike Brown wrote:Hmm, all very interesting, but it will take me a while to get used to Jeff I think, so at present I don't share the enthusiasm of most posters (sorry, Damian). As I'm not a fan of Sky Sports, I don't really know much about him, but I will certainly be tuning in and giving him a try. As for Rachel, she is obviously very easy on the eye and I'm sure she will have the personality to carry it off. Hope it goes well, I really want to like it!!
Yes, brand new set. New chairs, new cue cards, new titles, new potatoes.Steven Briers wrote:I agree with the general consensus that Jeff Stelling would be a good host. I've only ever seen him a couple of times on Sky Sports but he seems to fit the criteria. I wonder if there'll be a revamp of the set to launch the new era as well.
I'm sure you do know plenty about him and I certainly respect your ability to choose someone good! (and I presume you had quite a say in the proceedings). Best presenter ever? That's quite a statement. I think Richard will always be so synonymous to me (and lots of others) with Countdown that I don't think I will ever quite think that, but it's certainly very encouraging to hear you say it.Damian E wrote:That said, we know plenty about him and i personally think he'll be the best presenter we've ever had.
New letters and numbers? If so, maybe you could sell off the old ones for charity? I'd give you a few quid for one and I'm sure Charlie would pay at least a pony for the letter K.Damian E wrote:Yes, brand new set. New chairs, new cue cards, new titles, new potatoes.
I agree with you Mike, Richard was, and will always be the best presenter ever.Mike Brown wrote:I'm sure you do know plenty about him and I certainly respect your ability to choose someone good! (and I presume you had quite a say in the proceedings). Best presenter ever? That's quite a statement. I think Richard will always be so synonymous to me (and lots of others) with Countdown that I don't think I will ever quite think that, but it's certainly very encouraging to hear you say it.Damian E wrote:That said, we know plenty about him and i personally think he'll be the best presenter we've ever had.
Jon Corby wrote:Will this feud between Mike and Damian never end?
Bah, it was only really for Julian's benefit anyway, and he's not here anymore (although he might still lurk...)Damian E wrote:No feud. I think Mike is entitled to his opinion. Can't say the same for bowl ass though, who is turning into a first-class turkey.
Has he been on before? I don't remember it.Jon Corby wrote:Bah, it was only really for Julian's benefit anyway, and he's not here anymore (although he might still lurk...)Damian E wrote:No feud. I think Mike is entitled to his opinion. Can't say the same for bowl ass though, who is turning into a first-class turkey.
Since you mention Joseph though, is the rumour true that he's going to be invited back on the show for a second go?
Mike Brown wrote:I'm sure you do know plenty about him and I certainly respect your ability to choose someone good! (and I presume you had quite a say in the proceedings). Best presenter ever? That's quite a statement. I think Richard will always be so synonymous to me (and lots of others) with Countdown that I don't think I will ever quite think that, but it's certainly very encouraging to hear you say it.Damian E wrote:That said, we know plenty about him and i personally think he'll be the best presenter we've ever had.
I don't disagree with what you're saying, Damian, I'm just getting old!Damian E wrote:Sure, i get what you are saying Mike, but how does synonymy relate to being a better presenter?
And bear in mind, time marches on. The world turns. How many people under 25 have ever heard of Esther Rantzen, Timmy Mallet, Kilroy-Silk and some crooner from a 70's band called Dollar? Nostalgia sometimes clouds reality. That's my take on it anyway.
Mentioning Dollar, I once wrote a letter to "Jim'll Fix It" asking to kiss Thereza Bazar (spelling?) from Dollar. I'm guessing I would have been about 6 or 7, and her mid-20s.Damian E wrote:How many people under 25 have ever heard of Esther Rantzen, Timmy Mallet, Kilroy-Silk and some crooner from a 70's band called Dollar?
Is this in relation to Jeff or Rachel, or both?John Bradley wrote:Not so enthusiastic but I will hold fire until January.
To me, shows a lack of ambition for the show - someone who'll do it and who's cheap - keep our heads down and get on with it.
John Bradley wrote:Not so enthusiastic but I will hold fire until January.
To me, shows a lack of ambition for the show - someone who'll do it and who's cheap - keep our heads down and get on with it.
I suppose both - but really Jeff. Rachel less so as it mirrors Carol's story. I can always watch with the sound down! As I say, will hold fire 'til Jan.Jon Corby wrote:Is this in relation to Jeff or Rachel, or both?John Bradley wrote:Not so enthusiastic but I will hold fire until January.
To me, shows a lack of ambition for the show - someone who'll do it and who's cheap - keep our heads down and get on with it.
Well I'm sure there will be some saving in salaries?!?!? Just initial thoughts - for £50m a year I'll do it.Damian E wrote:John Bradley wrote:Not so enthusiastic but I will hold fire until January.
To me, shows a lack of ambition for the show - someone who'll do it and who's cheap - keep our heads down and get on with it.
So you'll hold fire until January, but only after you've already fired?
Hmm. Leave it with me.
Okay, you think its cheap. Let's pretend you have £50m to spend for a year. Tell me who you'd choose.
Terrible answer to a ridiculous post.John Bradley wrote:Well I'm sure there will be some saving in salaries?!?!? Just initial thoughts - for £50m a year I'll do it.Damian E wrote:John Bradley wrote:Not so enthusiastic but I will hold fire until January.
To me, shows a lack of ambition for the show - someone who'll do it and who's cheap - keep our heads down and get on with it.
So you'll hold fire until January, but only after you've already fired?
Hmm. Leave it with me.
Okay, you think its cheap. Let's pretend you have £50m to spend for a year. Tell me who you'd choose.
Terrible answer to a ridiculous post.[/quote]John Bradley wrote:Well I'm sure there will be some saving in salaries?!?!? Just initial thoughts - for £50m a year I'll do it.
Thank you.Damian E wrote:Terrible answer to a ridiculous post.John Bradley wrote:Well I'm sure there will be some saving in salaries?!?!? Just initial thoughts - for £50m a year I'll do it.
Amusing though.Damian E wrote:I really should know better.
Then You'll be watching me in action against the worryingly good Peter Daviesharry wrote: I'm in the audience a fortnight on Monday, so I'll get an early insight.
I'll be there as well, probably in the audienceCharlie Reams wrote:Then You'll be watching me in action against the worryingly good Peter Daviesharry wrote: I'm in the audience a fortnight on Monday, so I'll get an early insight.Make sure you come and say hi before/after, it's always nice to meet people who are otherwise virtual apparitions.
So you told The Sun, and waited long enough for them to write an article on it before telling us. How upsetting. I might cry.Damian E wrote:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sh ... 957136.ece
I'd ask for an explanation of the above, but cannot risk being bored to death by your shite.Gavin Chipper wrote:So you told The Sun, and waited long enough for them to write an article on it before telling us. How upsetting. I might cry.Damian E wrote:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sh ... 957136.ece
I posted these links earlier in the thread but fear they have been drowned out so in case you missed them, here's Jeff Stelling at his supreme best:Joe Denniss wrote:There's a funny Youtube video of Jeff Stelling in action on Sky Sports...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFZnHEmVWKc
Possible a little strange too...
Your own shite doesn't seem to bore you to death.Damian E wrote:I'd ask for an explanation of the above, but cannot risk being bored to death by your shite.Gavin Chipper wrote:So you told The Sun, and waited long enough for them to write an article on it before telling us. How upsetting. I might cry.Damian E wrote:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sh ... 957136.ece
Those clips are great precisely because he's normally so calm and professional even when relaying live results from about 100 games at once.Ralph wrote:I had never seen Jeff Stelling so I have now watched him on YouTube.
He is a bit "in your face" (I think that's the expression) isn't he?
I hope he doesn't rant on Countdown.