Page 4 of 13

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:45 pm
by Gavin Chipper
It might be a stupid question, but where does one acquire Countmax from?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:10 pm
by Charlie Reams
There's a link from http://www.apterous.org/cdb/recapwriter.php (when the site comes back up.) And it's not a stupid question, although Paul did ask the same thing fairly recently.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:37 pm
by Jon O'Neill
I think the grammar was stupid.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:03 pm
by Martin Gardner
Has VERONALS been taken out of the dictionary, I played a classic game against Harvey Freeman and 'beat' 'him' with VERONALS only to have it disallowed.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:48 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Martin Gardner wrote:Has VERONALS been taken out of the dictionary, I played a classic game against Harvey Freeman and 'beat' 'him' with VERONALS only to have it disallowed.
It lists VERONAL as a noun, so assume it would've been there.

On the subject of plurals, Susie allowed FENNELS today, which I didn't think was in.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:29 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Joseph Bolas wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:Has VERONALS been taken out of the dictionary, I played a classic game against Harvey Freeman and 'beat' 'him' with VERONALS only to have it disallowed.
It lists VERONAL as a noun, so assume it would've been there.
It does - but it's another name for BARBITONE which is a mass noun so I don't think they'd allow the plural. The reason I'm being cautious is the same thing occurs with OPALINE (a noun, but its meaning is Milk-Glass and upon checking Milk-Glass it is a mass noun). OPALINES has been disallowed on the show for this very reason, however, I think it was allowed at one point. I don't know - depends how nice you are to Susie before recording.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:25 pm
by David O'Donnell
It wouldn't let me have PLIOSAURS there, is that an error?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:35 pm
by Joseph Bolas
David O'Donnell wrote:It wouldn't let me have PLIOSAURS there, is that an error?
Checked the dictionary and PLIOSAUR is not a mass noun, so it should be there.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:42 pm
by Kirk Bevins
David O'Donnell wrote:It wouldn't let me have PLIOSAURS there, is that an error?
You sure the letters were there? PLIOSAURS is in countmax.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:50 pm
by David O'Donnell
Kirk Bevins wrote:
David O'Donnell wrote:It wouldn't let me have PLIOSAURS there, is that an error?
You sure the letters were there? PLIOSAURS is in countmax.
It was on Countgen, I probably goofed!

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:59 pm
by Martin Gardner
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Joseph Bolas wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:Has VERONALS been taken out of the dictionary, I played a classic game against Harvey Freeman and 'beat' 'him' with VERONALS only to have it disallowed.
It lists VERONAL as a noun, so assume it would've been there.
It does - but it's another name for BARBITONE which is a mass noun so I don't think they'd allow the plural. The reason I'm being cautious is the same thing occurs with OPALINE (a noun, but its meaning is Milk-Glass and upon checking Milk-Glass it is a mass noun). OPALINES has been disallowed on the show for this very reason, however, I think it was allowed at one point. I don't know - depends how nice you are to Susie before recording.
I seem to recall DC offering VERONALS before, perhaps I'm getting confused because it's permitted in Scrabble.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:03 am
by Gary Male
VERONAL is just listed as "n. a sedative drug, a derivative of barbituric acid" in COD9 so there would have been no reason to disallow VERONALS according to that dictionary. The joys of a book without the mass noun tag...

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:45 pm
by David Williams
Memory can play tricks, but before the NODE words like RAIMENTS and BUTANES were surely regularly disallowed even though the dictionary didn't specifically forbid them. Having mass nouns specified was a big help to DC. Just a shame the OED made such a botch of it.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:46 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Lookin at this game and the word Ben Pugh got in round 13:

http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=9527

Apparently this is the max according to countmax. Not so - KATSINAM is OK for 8 and so was surprised to see it not mentioned. I'm not sure how this was overlooked.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:20 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Kirk Bevins wrote:Apparently this is the max according to countmax. Not so - KATSINAM is OK for 8 and so was surprised to see it not mentioned.
HOW DO YOU KNOW THESE WORDS!!!???

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:38 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Dinos Sfyris wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Apparently this is the max according to countmax. Not so - KATSINAM is OK for 8 and so was surprised to see it not mentioned.
HOW DO YOU KNOW THESE WORDS!!!???
That's obvious. KATSINAM: a variant spelling of CATSINAM, which is a shortening of CATSINAMBUSH, when you use cats as bait. Not that hard.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:24 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Dinos Sfyris wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Apparently this is the max according to countmax. Not so - KATSINAM is OK for 8 and so was surprised to see it not mentioned.
HOW DO YOU KNOW THESE WORDS!!!???
Practice my dear friend. I've learnt loads on apterous (thanks, Charlie) and I learnt KATSINA. As it was new to me I checked it up in ODE2r to see if it could help me memorise it and then I found KATSINAM. Bit like finding TARIQAS and checking it up and noting it can be spelt TARIQATS so that is now also lodged in the brain.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:38 am
by Paul Howe
Not technically a CountMax error, but for lack of a better place to post the conundrum NEIGHBORHOOD, presumably an American spelling, came up in a hypernundrum attack.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:42 am
by Charlie Reams
Jono pointed out yesterday that GROUNDEST should probably be in, since GROUND has three adjectival senses.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:02 am
by Richard Brittain
I'm not sure about 'groundest', but Paul Howe and I think that 'mattest' should be in. It's a one-syllable adjective, and it sort of sounds right. The mattest finish.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:56 pm
by Charlie Reams
Richard Brittain wrote:I'm not sure about 'groundest', but Paul Howe and I think that 'mattest' should be in. It's a one-syllable adjective, and it sort of sounds right. The mattest finish.
Agreed.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:04 pm
by Kirk Bevins
FANDOM is listed as a noun and so FANDOMS should be allowed but I've just had it disallowed on apterous.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:00 pm
by Martin Gardner
Kirk Bevins wrote:FANDOM is listed as a noun and so FANDOMS should be allowed but I've just had it disallowed on apterous.
I was considering NAILERY recently. I think NAILERY is listed under NAILER, and it doesn't specify that the plural is NAILERIES? It's another one of those horrible ones, but shouldn't the plural just be NAILERYS under the actual Countdown rules? Hmm...

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:01 am
by Gavin Chipper
Martin Gardner wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:FANDOM is listed as a noun and so FANDOMS should be allowed but I've just had it disallowed on apterous.
I was considering NAILERY recently. I think NAILERY is listed under NAILER, and it doesn't specify that the plural is NAILERIES? It's another one of those horrible ones, but shouldn't the plural just be NAILERYS under the actual Countdown rules? Hmm...
I thought the rules were basically to follow the dictionary guidelines on plurals, which for words ending in -Y is that it will be specified. So I don't think there is a proper answer.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:00 pm
by Howard Somerset
How about BENTER and BENTEST? Ugly, I know, but BENT is a one syllable adjective, and as such ought to be allowed the -ER and -EST extensions.

BENTER was available on one of the programmes in the last few days. Although beaten by DC, it would have scored against the contestants.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:23 pm
by Charlie Reams
Howard Somerset wrote:How about BENTER and BENTEST? Ugly, I know, but BENT is a one syllable adjective, and as such ought to be allowed the -ER and -EST extensions.

BENTER was available on one of the programmes in the last few days. Although beaten by DC, it would have scored against the contestants.
Is BENT listed as an adjective or just as a past participle?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:21 pm
by Frank Rodolf
Charlie Reams wrote:
Howard Somerset wrote:How about BENTER and BENTEST? Ugly, I know, but BENT is a one syllable adjective, and as such ought to be allowed the -ER and -EST extensions.

BENTER was available on one of the programmes in the last few days. Although beaten by DC, it would have scored against the contestants.
Is BENT listed as an adjective or just as a past participle?
It's listed as both.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:50 pm
by Howard Somerset
I did think about that mention as a past participle of BEND, but as Frank says, it's listed as an adjective too. So by the usual reasoning, BENTER should be valid.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:36 pm
by Charlie Reams
Agreed, it should be allowed. BENTEST sounds quite realistic although BENTER seems weird.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:14 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Can't remember if I've flagged this up before but EIRENICS? EIRENIC is listed as an adjective but it says (also IRENIC). Upon looking at IRENIC it lists EIRENIC as an alternative and indeed it is an adjective. The only sense where an S can be pluralised, it clearly states IRENICS in brackets. This would hint to me that EIRENICS should be disallowed.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:52 pm
by Howard Somerset
MEOWING was disallowed as a US spelling in one of Junaid's games round 6. However, CountMax does allow it.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:42 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Howard Somerset wrote:MEOWING was disallowed as a US spelling in one of Junaid's games round 6. However, CountMax does allow it.
The same with COZIEST^ too.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:56 am
by Ian Volante
I recently had NUTRIAS disallowed. I can't see any sign in the dictionary that NUTRIA shouldn't be pluralised with an S, so why's it not in?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:27 am
by Frank Rodolf
Ian Volante wrote:I recently had NUTRIAS disallowed. I can't see any sign in the dictionary that NUTRIA shouldn't be pluralised with an S, so why's it not in?
It's listed as a mass noun...

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:43 pm
by Ben Hunter
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=13911

In R4 of this game FAJITA was disallowed, but FAJITAS was suggested as an acceptable beater. I was going to try FAJITAS but was worried it might be invalid, since foreign food pluralised weirdly.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:44 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Ben Hunter wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=13911

In R4 of this game FAJITA was disallowed, but FAJITAS was suggested as an acceptable beater.
Beat me to it.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:44 pm
by Ben Hunter
Kai Laddiman wrote:
Ben Hunter wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=13911

In R4 of this game FAJITA was disallowed, but FAJITAS was suggested as an acceptable beater.
Beat me to it.
I'm too fast for your ass, man.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:50 pm
by Charlie Reams
Ben Hunter wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=13911

In R4 of this game FAJITA was disallowed, but FAJITAS was suggested as an acceptable beater. I was going to try FAJITAS but was worried it might be invalid, since foreign food pluralised weirdly.
FAJITAS is like ENTRAILS; there's no singular.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:49 pm
by Ian Volante
Frank Rodolf wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:I recently had NUTRIAS disallowed. I can't see any sign in the dictionary that NUTRIA shouldn't be pluralised with an S, so why's it not in?
It's listed as a mass noun...
Am I failing to read the dictionary properly? I checked for that :(

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:35 pm
by Kai Laddiman
BIOSPHERES was disallowed in one of my games. BIOSPHERE is not listed as a mass noun. :?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:05 pm
by David O'Donnell
Kai Laddiman wrote:BIOSPHERES was disallowed in one of my games. BIOSPHERE is not listed as a mass noun. :?
The Goatdown wordlist is not as accurate as the standard wordlist.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:08 pm
by Jon O'Neill
David O'Donnell wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:BIOSPHERES was disallowed in one of my games. BIOSPHERE is not listed as a mass noun. :?
The Goatdown wordlist is not as accurate as the standard wordlist.
He means HyperCountdown.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:14 pm
by Kai Laddiman
I am really stressed because STRESSY isn't allowed. Why not?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:44 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Hmm CARLING is accepted on apterous and I've checked my ODE2r and I can't find it under CARL or CARLING or even a small CAR. Where is it or is it an error?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:43 pm
by Frank Rodolf
Kirk Bevins wrote:Hmm CARLING is accepted on apterous and I've checked my ODE2r and I can't find it under CARL or CARLING or even a small CAR. Where is it or is it an error?
It is not even listed with the second definition of CARLINE, of which it would have been an alternative - I am tempted to say it is indeed an error.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:47 pm
by Jon Corby
Frank Rodolf wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Hmm CARLING is accepted on apterous and I've checked my ODE2r and I can't find it under CARL or CARLING or even a small CAR. Where is it or is it an error?
It is not even listed with the second definition of CARLINE, of which it would have been an alternative - I am tempted to say it is indeed an error.
Hmm.... it's in CorbyDic as well, which suggests that it was found somewhere on the HTML pages of the OED website, which I no longer have access to. Alternate spelling of something maybe with no signpost?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:56 pm
by Ian Volante
Carling
n.
One of the short timbers running fore and aft that connect the transverse beams supporting the deck of a ship.

Whether it's allowed is another matter however.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:57 am
by Howard Somerset
Kai Laddiman wrote:I am really stressed because STRESSY isn't allowed. Why not?
Probably because STRESS isn't listed as an adjective, only as a noun or verb.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:02 pm
by Matt Morrison
Howard Somerset wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:I am really stressed because STRESSY isn't allowed. Why not?
Probably because STRESS isn't listed as an adjective, only as a noun or verb.
surely MOOD (from MOODY) isn't an adjective either?

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:56 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Not a Countmax error but did anybody who has the Countdown calendar notice that the conundrum yesterday, MAJORSHIP, isn't in the ODE? Oops!

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:34 pm
by Howard Somerset
Matt Morrison wrote:
Howard Somerset wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:I am really stressed because STRESSY isn't allowed. Why not?
Probably because STRESS isn't listed as an adjective, only as a noun or verb.
surely MOOD (from MOODY) isn't an adjective either?
But MOODY is listed in its own right.

Having got brain into gear, ignore my previous post in this thread; I'd confused adding -Y with turning -Y into -IER and -IEST.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:58 pm
by Gavin Chipper
I think it might have been mentioned before (can't be arsed to check) but I had MATTEST disallowed in the duel the other day, which I wasn't convinced with. I think I was the only one to go for it, but some went for MATTIEST (also disallowed but that didn't surprise me).

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:19 am
by Ben Wilson
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=3675

Pouter was disallowed in this one (and thank you Charlie for choosing my best game to kick my arse in :p) despite the fact it's in the ODE2r.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:39 am
by Kirk Bevins
Ben Wilson wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=3675

Pouter was disallowed in this one (and thank you Charlie for choosing my best game to kick my arse in :p) despite the fact it's in the ODE2r.
Cus there is no E, you muppet.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:41 am
by Gary Male
Ian Volante wrote:Carling
n.
One of the short timbers running fore and aft that connect the transverse beams supporting the deck of a ship.

Whether it's allowed is another matter however.
It was listed as a variation of CARLINE (2) in the ODE 2 (as was carlin), removed for the ODE2r. The biographical entry for Will Carling was also removed, on a completely useless note.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:49 am
by Charlie Reams
Ben Wilson wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=3675

Pouter was disallowed in this one (and thank you Charlie for choosing my best game to kick my arse in :p) despite the fact it's in the ODE2r.
In fairness I generously let you come back from 99-32 to 99-60.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:26 am
by Ben Wilson
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Ben Wilson wrote:http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=3675

Pouter was disallowed in this one (and thank you Charlie for choosing my best game to kick my arse in :p) despite the fact it's in the ODE2r.
Cus there is no E, you muppet.
Cock-up in the recap then. :p (which admittedly I wrote)

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:28 am
by Charlie Reams
TRIFECTAS should be in (hence the bug with CRAFTIEST showing up as a conundrum in Apterous.)

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:29 pm
by Jon O'Neill
I believe FAUXER and FAUXEST are missing.

Re: CountMax errors

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:35 am
by Gary Male
After seeing it disallowed in quite a few games recently on Apterous, MOHAIRS yay or nay? It's listed as a fabric, so logically should be allowed the plural? Plus the entry strongly suggests that their are different types of mohair.