Feature requests
Re: Feature requests
How about a statland page for best numbers solvers?
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
They're already there. I'd link you to them, but Apterous isn't playing properly at the moment.Dan Abrey wrote:How about a statland page for best numbers solvers?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Feature requests
ThisDan Abrey wrote:How about a statland page for best numbers solvers?
Re: Feature requests
I mean a list of best numbers game solvers sorted by percentage solved. Is that already there? Can't find it for looking!
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:37 am
Re: Feature requests
Facts and Figures > Statland > Top Players > Top Numbers PlayersDan Abrey wrote:I mean a list of best numbers game solvers sorted by percentage solved. Is that already there? Can't find it for looking!
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Feature requests
One day I'm going to stop coming up with new item ideas. Today is not that day.
How about a "jammy dodger" for winning a game by being behind on a crucial conundrum and getting it with <=1.0s left? I suppose it shouldn't be awarded if your opponent has already buzzed, otherwise there's no reason not to wait until 29s just to get the item.
How about a "jammy dodger" for winning a game by being behind on a crucial conundrum and getting it with <=1.0s left? I suppose it shouldn't be awarded if your opponent has already buzzed, otherwise there's no reason not to wait until 29s just to get the item.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Feature requests
A way of filtering the "online players", e.g. Bots, humans, seekers, normal, busy, all.
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Feature requests
You mean by colour or something similar? Yeah, that would work, surprised no one has thought of it before.Rhys Benjamin wrote:A way of filtering the "online players", e.g. Bots, humans, seekers, normal, busy, all.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Feature requests
no, sort of one box for each cat.Ryan Taylor wrote:You mean by colour or something similar? Yeah, that would work, surprised no one has thought of it before.Rhys Benjamin wrote:A way of filtering the "online players", e.g. Bots, humans, seekers, normal, busy, all.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am
- Location: Seated at a computer
Re: Feature requests
Ryan Taylor wrote:Yeah, that would work, surprised no one has thought of it before.
Someone's already thought of that too:Rhys Benjamin wrote:No, sort of one box for each cat.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Don't forget one jar for each man.Rhys Benjamin wrote:No, sort of one box for each cat.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am
- Location: Seated at a computer
Re: Feature requests
PROTISTAN
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:46 pm
Re: Feature requests
Two Boy Scouts for KAIKAI?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Feature requests
How about, if player A plays player B for the very first time, it's random who sits in chair A or chair B but after that, every time they play a particular format it alternates where they sit. This came about as I was player 1 three times in a row against a player who used tricky numbers games to try and claw back points and, although it's 50:50, I felt hard done by 3 times in a row being the "champion". It would be much better if it alternated.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm
Re: Feature requests
- Rivals to be somewhere on the left side so I don't have to manually add "rivals.php" to the end of the URL every time.
- I don't really mind a limit on the number of rivals, but 3? I can't even check off everybody on my Rival-o-matic.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Feature requests
***LIKE***Hugh Binnie wrote:Two Boy Scouts for KAIKAI?
***LIKE***
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Feature requests
I thought that the winner of the previous game between 2 players sits in the champions chair next game, just as in the show.Kirk Bevins wrote:How about, if player A plays player B for the very first time, it's random who sits in chair A or chair B but after that, every time they play a particular format it alternates where they sit. This came about as I was player 1 three times in a row against a player who used tricky numbers games to try and claw back points and, although it's 50:50, I felt hard done by 3 times in a row being the "champion". It would be much better if it alternated.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Feature requests
On a related note, I suggest a 15-round format that has 4 numbers rounds that's available from the drop-down thing. Something like LlLlN lLlLn LnlNC. First two "halves" would be as normal and only the third half would be different. I'd suggest this to Damian for the actual show, but I'm worried that it might turn out to be objectively a bad idea and I don't think I could take that.Kirk Bevins wrote:How about, if player A plays player B for the very first time, it's random who sits in chair A or chair B but after that, every time they play a particular format it alternates where they sit. This came about as I was player 1 three times in a row against a player who used tricky numbers games to try and claw back points and, although it's 50:50, I felt hard done by 3 times in a row being the "champion". It would be much better if it alternated.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
I've been considering rolling out the Blitz format to other variants. Maybe something more numbers-oriented could also go into rotation, although it could be something a little more "radical" than one extra numbers round. Ideas?Gavin Chipper wrote:I suggest a 15-round format that has 4 numbers rounds that's available from the drop-down thing. Something like LlLlN lLlLn LnlNC.
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4547
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Feature requests
The masters format (LNCx5) could fit the bill here.Charlie Reams wrote:I've been considering rolling out the Blitz format to other variants. Maybe something more numbers-oriented could also go into rotation, although it could be something a little more "radical" than one extra numbers round. Ideas?Gavin Chipper wrote:I suggest a 15-round format that has 4 numbers rounds that's available from the drop-down thing. Something like LlLlN lLlLn LnlNC.
- Karen Pearson
- Devotee
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:28 am
- Location: Bromsgrove
Re: Feature requests
I like the new format for voting on Game of the Week (where you can now see the details of the games on the voting page). The only slight issue is that I can't remember if 1 is better than 5 or vice versa and I can't see it explained anywhere on the page. Any chance we could have it annotated please just so that I don't vote incorrectly?
I know I'm a market researcher so I should be able to work it out but my experience is that people have different preferences for rating scales and it's best not to make assumptions (like when I gave my badminton coach 4 out of 4 for everything and then he pointed out that 4 was the lowest score and I had should have given 1s!!).
I know I'm a market researcher so I should be able to work it out but my experience is that people have different preferences for rating scales and it's best not to make assumptions (like when I gave my badminton coach 4 out of 4 for everything and then he pointed out that 4 was the lowest score and I had should have given 1s!!).
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:28 pm
- Location: East Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
When I look on Statland I would love to see where I sit outside of the top ranks.
To explain that better...
If I look at, for example, "Statland: Most multitalented players" - I see the Top 30 but I have no idea where I rank, albeit I'm probably somewhere near the bottom. But if I could see that it would give me the goal of improving my standing, which definitely appeals...
Perhaps you can already see this some other way - apologies if so (and tell me where it is).
Thanks..
To explain that better...
If I look at, for example, "Statland: Most multitalented players" - I see the Top 30 but I have no idea where I rank, albeit I'm probably somewhere near the bottom. But if I could see that it would give me the goal of improving my standing, which definitely appeals...
Perhaps you can already see this some other way - apologies if so (and tell me where it is).
Thanks..
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:20 am
Re: Feature requests
Yeah, I've also thought it would be interesting to see how far off I was from making some list or other. (Especially the numbers pages that give stuff like max percentages, and I can't see my own if I'm not on the page myself.)Nick Boldock wrote:When I look on Statland I would love to see where I sit outside of the top ranks.
To explain that better...
If I look at, for example, "Statland: Most multitalented players" - I see the Top 30 but I have no idea where I rank, albeit I'm probably somewhere near the bottom. But if I could see that it would give me the goal of improving my standing, which definitely appeals...
Perhaps you can already see this some other way - apologies if so (and tell me where it is).
Thanks..
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:28 pm
- Location: East Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Realistically I know, as an "average" player, I'm not going to make the Top 30 of hardly any of the charts (if any) but I guess in order to calculate the top 30 there must be some kind of routine behind which calculates the same stats for every player? In which case surely it could add on the bottom, just after the Top 30 (or 20, or whatever), the logged in player's own stats in comparison. That way, although I can't make those charts in the foreseeable future, I'd still be able to chart progress and set my own aims - say aiming for the top 100, top 50 or whatever. I'm not suggesting showing everyone's stats - just the top dogs and then one at the bottom.Miriam Nussbaum wrote:Yeah, I've also thought it would be interesting to see how far off I was from making some list or other. (Especially the numbers pages that give stuff like max percentages, and I can't see my own if I'm not on the page myself.)Nick Boldock wrote:When I look on Statland I would love to see where I sit outside of the top ranks.
To explain that better...
If I look at, for example, "Statland: Most multitalented players" - I see the Top 30 but I have no idea where I rank, albeit I'm probably somewhere near the bottom. But if I could see that it would give me the goal of improving my standing, which definitely appeals...
Perhaps you can already see this some other way - apologies if so (and tell me where it is).
Thanks..
Like when you look at the tennis rankings on BBC Sport and underneath the important people it shows you where the Brits are ranked...
(I like that analogy)*
*With apologies to Mr Andrew Murray.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
It's a nice idea, although there are significant technical obstacles beyond what's obvious from the outside. However (as I've said before) one of my objectives for the rest of the year is doing more for the "broad middle" of the ability range, so never say never.Nick Boldock wrote:Realistically I know, as an "average" player, I'm not going to make the Top 30 of hardly any of the charts (if any) but I guess in order to calculate the top 30 there must be some kind of routine behind which calculates the same stats for every player? In which case surely it could add on the bottom, just after the Top 30 (or 20, or whatever), the logged in player's own stats in comparison. That way, although I can't make those charts in the foreseeable future, I'd still be able to chart progress and set my own aims - say aiming for the top 100, top 50 or whatever. I'm not suggesting showing everyone's stats - just the top dogs and then one at the bottom.Miriam Nussbaum wrote:Yeah, I've also thought it would be interesting to see how far off I was from making some list or other. (Especially the numbers pages that give stuff like max percentages, and I can't see my own if I'm not on the page myself.)Nick Boldock wrote:When I look on Statland I would love to see where I sit outside of the top ranks.
To explain that better...
If I look at, for example, "Statland: Most multitalented players" - I see the Top 30 but I have no idea where I rank, albeit I'm probably somewhere near the bottom. But if I could see that it would give me the goal of improving my standing, which definitely appeals...
Perhaps you can already see this some other way - apologies if so (and tell me where it is).
Thanks..
Like when you look at the tennis rankings on BBC Sport and underneath the important people it shows you where the Brits are ranked...
(I like that analogy)*
*With apologies to Mr Andrew Murray.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:28 pm
- Location: East Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Fair enough, sounds promising... ish.Charlie Reams wrote: It's a nice idea, although there are significant technical obstacles beyond what's obvious from the outside. However (as I've said before) one of my objectives for the rest of the year is doing more for the "broad middle" of the ability range, so never say never.
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Feature requests
I know it's very luck-based, but a leaderboard for most darrens in a 15 rounder.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Feature requests
I've noticed myself at the bottom of the Pro ranks before - is this not just the same as that but for other things as well?Charlie Reams wrote:It's a nice idea, although there are significant technical obstacles beyond what's obvious from the outside. However (as I've said before) one of my objectives for the rest of the year is doing more for the "broad middle" of the ability range, so never say never.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Yes it's identical, I was lying when I said it was difficult.Gavin Chipper wrote:I've noticed myself at the bottom of the Pro ranks before - is this not just the same as that but for other things as well?Charlie Reams wrote:It's a nice idea, although there are significant technical obstacles beyond what's obvious from the outside. However (as I've said before) one of my objectives for the rest of the year is doing more for the "broad middle" of the ability range, so never say never.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Feature requests
Haha - fair enough, sorry.Charlie Reams wrote:Yes it's identical, I was lying when I said it was difficult.Gavin Chipper wrote:I've noticed myself at the bottom of the Pro ranks before - is this not just the same as that but for other things as well?Charlie Reams wrote:It's a nice idea, although there are significant technical obstacles beyond what's obvious from the outside. However (as I've said before) one of my objectives for the rest of the year is doing more for the "broad middle" of the ability range, so never say never.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Here's the answer I might have given if I had been feeling more charitable: Pro Ranks operates on a completely different subsystem to Statland and has a fairly fundamentally different design under the hood. I was thinking today that it's not completely infeasible that Statland could be migrated to something more like Pro Ranks, but it would be a significant amount of work just because there's so much stuff on Statland now (and ease of development was something I designed for from the beginning). But it would be kinda cool and could probably be done incrementally, if I was willing to put up with the spurious bug reports in the mean time. So... maybe.Gavin Chipper wrote: Yes it's identical, I was lying when I said it was difficult.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm
Re: Feature requests
I think you'll find that's called "Flat".Rhys Benjamin wrote:Raw Scoring
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:05 am
Re: Feature requests
How about under a variant page, a stat of lowest score to go with highest score?
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Feature requests
Presumably lowest score in most variants would be 0 more or less?James Bradley wrote:How about under a variant page, a stat of lowest score to go with highest score?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:05 am
Re: Feature requests
That's true, but if the bots were excluded would there be many human players scoring 0?Ryan Taylor wrote:Presumably lowest score in most variants would be 0 more or less?James Bradley wrote:How about under a variant page, a stat of lowest score to go with highest score?
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:37 am
Re: Feature requests
Bizarrely some otherwise sane players would deliberately score 0 just to get their name on the page, so I'm afraid it would be pointless.James Bradley wrote:That's true, but if the bots were excluded would there be many human players scoring 0?Ryan Taylor wrote:Presumably lowest score in most variants would be 0 more or less?James Bradley wrote:How about under a variant page, a stat of lowest score to go with highest score?
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
To repeat what Charlie has said several times before, and what I've said on behalf of Charlie several times before, there won't be 'high score' pages that specifically bring a focus to bad performances and bad players, it just isn't constructive to the growth of the site. Or nice.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Feature requests
What, similar to this on here?Matthew Tassier wrote:Bizarrely some otherwise sane players would deliberately score 0 just to get their name on the page, so I'm afraid it would be pointless.James Bradley wrote:That's true, but if the bots were excluded would there be many human players scoring 0?Ryan Taylor wrote: Presumably lowest score in most variants would be 0 more or less?
Incidentally, a secondary objective in that game seems to have been to spell words vertically. "Octo chat pee" and "dire coot git". I'm guessing Charlie was going for "octochamp".
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Feature requests
How about a message appearing in the chat window whenever someone enters the Bash Room? Could serve as a reminder to people that it's there and get it a bit more populated.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
- Lesley Hines
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
- Location: Worcester
Re: Feature requests
Aw, you subscribed. Fair playRhys Benjamin wrote:A resign feature.
Lowering the averages since 2009
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Persons chosen most as rival.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Cool. Might throw up something interesting.Ian Volante wrote:Persons chosen most as rival.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Another quick comparison column for your rivals on rivals.php would be 'Duel points this month'.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Feature requests
The problem with that is you could resign before the game ends, potentially denying your opponent the chance of a high score or whatever. You could restrict it only to situations where the game goes to a tie-break, and automatically award the other player the points for that round, but somehow it doesn't seem right to award a player points for something they haven't done.Rhys Benjamin wrote:A resign feature.
An "offer draw" feature might work, though, whereby a tied game can be curtailed by mutual agreement. I can see that being useful in the more esoteric variants when, as in this case, two players get stuck in a never-ending stream of tie-break conundrums.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
That's actually a nice idea.Graeme Cole wrote: An "offer draw" feature might work, though, whereby a tied game can be curtailed by mutual agreement. I can see that being useful in the more esoteric variants when, as in this case, two players get stuck in a never-ending stream of tie-break conundrums.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Also, make the 'Latest duel' position, considering it only appears for completed duels, link to the specific duel game in question.Matt Morrison wrote:Another quick comparison column for your rivals on rivals.php would be 'Duel points this month'.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
He actually didn't, an anonymous donor subscribed for him. Oddly he's never commented on it.Lesley Hines wrote:Aw, you subscribed. Fair playRhys Benjamin wrote:A resign feature.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Feature requests
Posted under Rhys's name, but I am Rhys's dad, Martin. I did not know that Rhys was meant to pay for being on apterous. He has only just told me, although I was aware that he has been on apterous for some time now. I have contacted both Charlie and the benefactor to thank the latter for generously agreeing to pay, but I think it is only right that I should pay, and I shall be rectifying the situation accordingly. I would not be happy if the situation were left as it is, if only because Rhys needs to know the right way to do these things. I am sure the offer was well meant, and a nice gesture, but Rhys really needs to understand that it is up to himself and his family to sort out such matters, and not to rely on the generosity of others.
No need for further comment on this, I think - I hope we can leave it there and let everyone carry on enjoying apterous.
Finally, I would like to thank everyone on apterous and at CoLei for making Rhys welcome both as a virtual and actual player of the game. Maybe one day when I have time, I shall subscribe. That way, everyone else will have someone they can beat on a regular basis!
Regards
Martin Benjamin
No need for further comment on this, I think - I hope we can leave it there and let everyone carry on enjoying apterous.
Finally, I would like to thank everyone on apterous and at CoLei for making Rhys welcome both as a virtual and actual player of the game. Maybe one day when I have time, I shall subscribe. That way, everyone else will have someone they can beat on a regular basis!
Regards
Martin Benjamin
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Feature requests
I've already forgotten what happened in October 2010. Any chance of apterous history?
Re: Feature requests
Tiny tiny thing but would aid my curiosity and awful memory for small images - tooltips on the icons for variants on pages where only the icon is shown (such as the latest pencils on the homepage)
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Feature requests
I was wondering if it was possible for the clock to be tied up more with the music in the game. If there's a laggy moment, the clock can jump but the music won't so they can get out of sync. Also the music starts again after an incorrect conundrum buzz, rather than carrying on from where it left off.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Feature requests
I don't know much about coding but it sounds to me like this might be one of those things that sounds easy but it ridiculously hard, so the effort to reward ratio is not very favourable.Gavin Chipper wrote:I was wondering if it was possible for the clock to be tied up more with the music in the game. If there's a laggy moment, the clock can jump but the music won't so they can get out of sync. Also the music starts again after an incorrect conundrum buzz, rather than carrying on from where it left off.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Feature requests
If you right-click on the player list you can hide the bots
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4547
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Feature requests
Can you reactive the spindlomatic? It's been ages since we've had any new DC guests and some of the dialogue is getting pretty old.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Feature requests
How about a queue option for challenges? If, for example I want to play Jojo, but he's already in a game it would be rude to issue a challenge. Rather than sitting idly waiting for him to finish, I could "add name to challenge queue" and then go play a bot or do something in another window. Then when Jojo finishes his game the challenge would issue automatically. To prevent multiple challenges being offered this could be limited to one challenge per player. It would also be helpful to know if other players are queueing waiting to play him.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Feature requests
Hmm, would it? I do this all the time.Liam Tiernan wrote:If, for example I want to play Jojo, but he's already in a game it would be rude to issue a challenge.
Re: Feature requests
Does Jojo not get annoyed?Charlie Reams wrote:Hmm, would it? I do this all the time.Liam Tiernan wrote:If, for example I want to play Jojo, but he's already in a game it would be rude to issue a challenge.