Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Moderator: James Robinson
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
James will be here with the stats shortly, but first:
The cat went here and there
And the moon spun round like a top,
And the nearest kin of the moon,
The creeping cat, looked up.
Black Minnaloushe stared at the moon,
For, wander and wail as he would,
The pure cold light in the sky
Troubled his animal blood.
Minnaloushe runs in the grass
Lifting his delicate feet.
Do you dance, Minnaloushe, do you dance?
When two close kindred meet,
What better than call a dance?
Maybe the moon may learn,
Tired of that courtly fashion,
A new dance turn.
Minnaloushe creeps through the grass
From moonlit place to place,
The sacred moon overhead
Has taken a new phase.
Does Minnaloushe know that his pupils
Will pass from change to change,
And that from round to crescent,
From crescent to round they range?
Minnaloushe creeps through the grass
Alone, important and wise,
And lifts to the changing moon
His changing eyes.
The cat went here and there
And the moon spun round like a top,
And the nearest kin of the moon,
The creeping cat, looked up.
Black Minnaloushe stared at the moon,
For, wander and wail as he would,
The pure cold light in the sky
Troubled his animal blood.
Minnaloushe runs in the grass
Lifting his delicate feet.
Do you dance, Minnaloushe, do you dance?
When two close kindred meet,
What better than call a dance?
Maybe the moon may learn,
Tired of that courtly fashion,
A new dance turn.
Minnaloushe creeps through the grass
From moonlit place to place,
The sacred moon overhead
Has taken a new phase.
Does Minnaloushe know that his pupils
Will pass from change to change,
And that from round to crescent,
From crescent to round they range?
Minnaloushe creeps through the grass
Alone, important and wise,
And lifts to the changing moon
His changing eyes.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Friday is POETS day.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
You're right.Marc Meakin wrote:Friday is POETS day.
When my arms wrap you round I press
My heart upon the loveliness
That has long faded from the world;
The jewelled crowns that kings have hurled
In shadowy pools, when armies fled;
The love-tales wrought with silken thread
By dreaming ladies upon cloth
That has made fat the murderous moth;
The roses that of old time were
Woven by ladies in their hair,
The dew-cold lilies ladies bore
Through many a sacred corridor
Where such grey clouds of incense rose
That only God's eyes did not close:
For that pale breast and lingering hand
Come from a more dream-heavy land,
A more dream-heavy hour than this;
And when you sigh from kiss to kiss
I hear white Beauty sighing, too,
For hours when all must fade like dew,
But flame on flame, and deep on deep,
Throne over throne where in half sleep,
Their swords upon their iron knees,
Brood her high lonely mysteries.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
There aren't really too many stats that I can think of for today's show.Ben Hunter wrote:James will be here with the stats shortly.
Let's just see if Heather can win another for the girls, since the series score so far is pretty much one-sided in the gender category.
Boys: 26, Girls: 3
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Although there have been far more male than female contestants.James Robinson wrote:There aren't really too many stats that I can think of for today's show.Ben Hunter wrote:James will be here with the stats shortly.
Let's just see if Heather can win another for the girls, since the series score so far is pretty much one-sided in the gender category.
Boys: 26, Girls: 3
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
True, but if a female won a few games, or even became an octochamp, that wouldn't necessarily matter.Marc Meakin wrote:Although there have been far more male than female contestants.James Robinson wrote:There aren't really too many stats that I can think of for today's show.Ben Hunter wrote:James will be here with the stats shortly.
Let's just see if Heather can win another for the girls, since the series score so far is pretty much one-sided in the gender category.
Boys: 26, Girls: 3
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
What makes you think she's playing a bloke today?James Robinson wrote:Let's just see if Heather can win another for the girls, since the series score so far is pretty much one-sided in the gender category.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Statistics do not work that way.James Robinson wrote: True, but if a female won a few games, or even became an octochamp, that wouldn't necessarily matter.
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
This sounds fascinating.Charlie Reams wrote:Statistics do not work that way.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Where does it suggest that I think she's playing a bloke, DamianD Eadie wrote:What makes you think she's playing a bloke today?James Robinson wrote:Let's just see if Heather can win another for the girls, since the series score so far is pretty much one-sided in the gender category.
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Nowhere, it's perfectly obvious from your post that you think she's playing another female. My mistake, i must concentrate.James Robinson wrote:Where does it suggest that I think she's playing a bloke, DamianD Eadie wrote:What makes you think she's playing a bloke today?James Robinson wrote:Let's just see if Heather can win another for the girls, since the series score so far is pretty much one-sided in the gender category.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
First all female contest for sometime.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
I believe the last one was the last prelim of Series 61, Jan Parker v. Gayle Knight.Marc Meakin wrote:First all female contest for sometime.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
POPSTREL for a beater in round 4.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
POPSTER
Edit grrr Kirk.
Edit grrr Kirk.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Kevin Davis
- Acolyte
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:02 am
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
And a flat numbers means it's all square at the anecdote.
I've got to stop reading Weaver's Week.
I've got to stop reading Weaver's Week.
Oh, cackwires!
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
I see that you own the pencil for it too.Kirk Bevins wrote:POPSTREL for a beater in round 4.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
ABRIDGES is also there for round 6
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Kevin Davis
- Acolyte
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:02 am
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Irene blatantly cheated on the first numbers.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Not two Is, so sorry. As for the first numbers, Matt, it seemed like there was a cut in recording so I'm not sure what went on in the studio but it did seem odd with Rachel saying "what have you written down" and then her nailing it.Kevin Davis wrote:SEMIOTIC a beater in R7.
- Kevin Davis
- Acolyte
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:02 am
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
If anyone wants me, I'll be in that darkened room over there.Kirk Bevins wrote:Not two Is, so sorry. As for the first numbers, Matt, it seemed like there was a cut in recording so I'm not sure what went on in the studio but it did seem odd with Rachel saying "what have you written down" and then her nailing it.Kevin Davis wrote:SEMIOTIC a beater in R7.
Oh, cackwires!
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Well played Heather.
Good close contest.
Good close contest.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Good contest again and a great pressured conundrum to secure your place as champion. Well done.
Credit also to Susie I feel, as a few times recently she was about to say American spellings and stopped herself and said American words, which are of course valid. DAYCARE was today's example.
Credit also to Susie I feel, as a few times recently she was about to say American spellings and stopped herself and said American words, which are of course valid. DAYCARE was today's example.
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Harsh words indeed. She was just nervous and started to read out her first incorrect attempt from her paper instead of reading the correct solution. Certainly didn't cheat.Matt Morrison wrote:Irene blatantly cheated on the first numbers.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
I dread to think what people would say if you'd left in my repeated attempts to spell CROTALE...D Eadie wrote:Harsh words indeed. She was just nervous and started to read out her first incorrect attempt from her paper instead of reading the correct solution. Certainly didn't cheat.Matt Morrison wrote:Irene blatantly cheated on the first numbers.
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Charlie, you really DON'T want to hear what people said about you...............Charlie Reams wrote:I dread to think what people would say if you'd left in my repeated attempts to spell CROTALE...
- Kevin Davis
- Acolyte
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:02 am
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
I would imagine the floor manager/a producer/someone else would have checked what was written "off-air"; hence the cut. Correct me if I'm wrong there, of course.D Eadie wrote:Harsh words indeed. She was just nervous and started to read out her first incorrect attempt from her paper instead of reading the correct solution. Certainly didn't cheat.Matt Morrison wrote:Irene blatantly cheated on the first numbers.
Oh, cackwires!
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
The 'cut' was for about 3 seconds, because Irene stopped, thinking she'd blown it and had been disqualified from the round. She'd written two lots of workings out. The first was not close enough to the target, the second was the target, 340. All she did was start to read out the wrong one when Jeff asked her. No biggy really. The very second Rachel asked her what she had written down, she rattled off the correct solution. Nerves play a part sometimes, that's all.Kevin Davis wrote:I would imagine the floor manager/a producer/someone else would have checked what was written "off-air"; hence the cut. Correct me if I'm wrong there, of course.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Wasn't really suggesting she was cheating. Not seriously.
- Richard Priest
- Devotee
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
- Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Not quite the complete definition of COSTIVE from Susie
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Very happy with ESTOPPEL in round 4.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Friday February 19th 2010
Well, statistics are just statistics. They don't decide what James Robinson considers to matter.Charlie Reams wrote:Statistics do not work that way.James Robinson wrote: True, but if a female won a few games, or even became an octochamp, that wouldn't necessarily matter.