Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Round-by-round summaries of every game in recent series; for every series in the last 5 years, try cdb, the Countdown database. Obviously this forum contains spoilers!

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Allan Harmer
Enthusiast
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
Location: Petersfield (Hants)

Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Allan Harmer »

Countdown recap for Friday 23 October 2009.

C1: Champion Brian Selway (4 wins, 368 points.)
Brian is a quiet kitchen assistant from Honiton, with ambitions to be a chef. If he is as good at cooking as he is at Countdown, then he should soon have a Michelin Star! Brian is rapidly proving to be the joker in this Series pack and with an average of 92, looks sure to become an Octochamp with his excellent word-power.
C2: Challenger Ray Pearson.
Ray is a Health and Safety Officer from Wrexham. He has a 5 year old daughter and his favourite place is Iceland. His claim to fame is that he met Bjork in a bar there.
DC: Susie Dent and Lesley Garrett.
RR: Rachel Riley.
OT: Other words or solutions.

R01: M U R A R F E E S
R02: T K O B O R R A E
R03: P D G R A E U P I
R04: N O S E J S T O A
R05: 3, 10, 8, 1, 100, 50. Target: 735.
TTT: NILIMAGE - "Sending lots of letters but without envelopes"
R06: I F V A T C I E L
R07: H P L I E A D E N
R08: D E R T U O Z N L
R09: B M E P A E S S E
R10: 8, 10, 3, 2, 7, 100. Target: 766.
TTT: PUNDITME - "Lacking respect for Susie, perhaps"
R11: L A R I I N O N E
R12: W O U G C T O M E
R13: S D A Y I A H I S
R14: 7, 6, 8, 4, 100, 75. Target: 420.
R15: G I L T F A I R Y (conundrum)


And now a brief interlude before our main feature:

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

Enjoy the show.

Round 1: M U R A R F E E S

C1: SMEARER (7)
C2: FARMERS (7)
DC: REFRAMES (8) MEASURER (8)
Score: 7–7 (max 8)
Ray is disappointed that he did not declare REFRAMES, as he had it written down. Will that decision prove to be costly? as Brian has not been beaten many times in a letters round so far!
Round 2: T K O B O R R A E

C1: BOATER (6)
C2: BROKER (6)
DC: ORATOR (6)
OT: BARKER (6) BARTER (6) BETOOK (6) BORATE (6) BOOKER (6) REBOOK (6) KORERO (6) REBOOT (6) RETOOK (6) ROOTER (6) TORERO (6)
Score: 13–13 (max 14)
Lesley erroneously declares a 7 for DC instead of a 6, which is the max. for this round.

Round 3: P D G R A E U P I

C1: GRIPPED (7)
C2: GRIPPED (7)
DC: UPGRADE (7)
OT: GAPPIER (7) GAUDIER (7) PREPAID (7) PUDGIER (7)
Score: 20–20 (max 21)

Round 4: N O S E J S T O A

C1: SEASON (6)
C2: STONES (6)
DC: ATONES (6)
OT: SOONEST (7)
Score: 26–26 (max 28)

Round 5: 3, 10, 8, 1, 100, 50. Target: 735.

C1: -
C2: 736. 8x100=800-50-10-3-1 (7)
RR: 735. 8-1=7x(100+(50/10)) (10)
Score: 26–33 (max 38)
Brian slips behind in a tough numbers round, where the trick is to find the 5 to add to the 100 before x by 7, which Rachel does nicely.

Lesley tells a nice little story about dodgy fan mail that she received, the audience applauds. Cue TTT. Hang on, what's this? Lesley suckers everyone as she reminds us that she was in Carousel and is going to sing her favourite song from it. She dedicates it to the troops in Afghanistan - At least they won't need a satellite to hear it, as she belts it out at full volume, much to the disgust of some forumites and the sound crew ;) By the way, nice frock today Lesley :D

Teatime teaser: NILIMAGE -> EMAILING

Round 6: I F V A T C I E L

C1: ACTIVE (6)
C2: FACILE (6)
OT: CILIATE (7) FACTIVE (7) FICTILE (7) FICTIVE (7) ILVAITE (7)
Score: 32–39 (max 45)
Some tough 7's are available but they are missed by all but the most hardened apterist.

Round 7: H P L I E A D E N

C1: HEADLINE (8)
C2: PLANED (6)
Score: 40–39 (max 53)
A great spot by Brian, who shows his class again, to take a slight lead.

Round 8: D E R T U O Z N L

C1: TRUNDLE (7)
C2: TRUNDLE (7)
DC: ROUNDEL (7)
Score: 47–46 (max 60)

Round 9: B M E P A E S S E

C1: empasse
C2: BEAMS (5)
DC: SESAME (6)
Score: 47–51 (max 66)
Brian risks a variant spelling of IMPASSE, which is unsuccessful and he falls behind again.

Susie tells us some interesting facts relating to how nations get attached to phrases, such as 'French Leave', 'Dutch Treat', etc.

Round 10: 8, 10, 3, 2, 7, 100. Target: 766.

C1: 766. 100+8=108x7=756+10 (10)
C2: 766. 100+10=110x7=770-4 (10)
Score: 57–61 (max 76)

Teatime teaser: PUNDITME -> IMPUDENT

Round 11: L A R I I N O N E

C1: OILIER (6)
C2: INNER (5)
DC: ALIENOR (7) AIRLINE (7)
OT: AILERON (7) ANILINE (7)
Score: 63–61 (max 83)
Brian regains his lead, as both contestants miss some gettable 7's.

Round 12: W O U G C T O M E

C1: OUTCOME (7)
C2: OUTCOME (7)
Score: 70–68 (max 90)

Round 13: S D A Y I A H I S

C1: SASHAY (6)
C2: DAISY (5)
OT: SHAADIS (7)
Score: 76–68 (max 97)
A good spot again by Brian, to improve his lead.

Round 14: 7, 6, 8, 4, 100, 75. Target: 420.

C1: 420. 6-(8-7)+100=105x4 (10)
C2: 419.
Score: 86–68 (max 107)
A better numbers solution from Brian, to take an unassailable lead, which is deserved. He visibly heaves a sigh of relief as realises that he has won.
Round 15: G I L T F A I R Y

C1 buzzes on 2 seconds to say FRAGILITY which is correct.
Score: 96–68 (max 117)
A lightning spot by Brian, to get the Conundrum and record another high score. He looks certain to qualify for the Finals now and it remains to be seen how high he can get. He deserves to gain Octochamp status and will give anyone a good game in the Finals.

Ray rues that fact that he didn't declare REFRAMES, which would have made it a crucial Conundrum. He was a solid player and played very respectably.

Overall, a very enjoyable game today.
Further summaries are at:
http://www.apterous.org/cdb/series.php?series=61
Last edited by Allan Harmer on Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by James Robinson »

Allan Harmer wrote:Round 5: 3, 10, 8, 1, 100, 50. Target: 735.

C1: -
C2: 736. 8x100=800-50-10-3-1 (7)
RR: 735. 8-1=7x(100+(10/2)) (10)
Score: 26–33 (max 38)
Unless, I'm not mistaken, Allan, there is no 2 in the selection, or there is something wrong with the working out.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Charlie Reams »

Allan Harmer wrote: Round 4: N O S E J S T O A

C1: SEASON (6)
C2: STONES (6)
DC: ATONES (6)
OT: SOONEST (7)
Score: 26–26 (max 28)
No one has ever explained to me how SOON, which is an adverb not an adjective, is allowed to have comparative and superlative forms.
Richard Adams
Rookie
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Richard Adams »

James Robinson wrote:
Allan Harmer wrote:Round 5: 3, 10, 8, 1, 100, 50. Target: 735.

RR: 735. 8-1=7x(100+(10/2)) (10)
Unless, I'm not mistaken, Allan, there is no 2 in the selection, or there is something wrong with the working out.
I think that James is not not mistaken (apart from about negatives), and that this should probably read:

RR:735. 8 - 1 = 7 x (100 + (50/10) ) (10)
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Allan Harmer wrote: He has a 5 year old daughter and his favourite place is Iceland.
Yeah it's not bad - they have 10 neopolitans on offer at the moment for just 75p.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Jon Corby »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Allan Harmer wrote: Round 4: N O S E J S T O A

C1: SEASON (6)
C2: STONES (6)
DC: ATONES (6)
OT: SOONEST (7)
Score: 26–26 (max 28)
No one has ever explained to me how SOON, which is an adverb not an adjective, is allowed to have comparative and superlative forms.
This came up in CoC XII as I recall, as someone played it against Conor and he wondered whether it should have been allowed. I think there was a brief discussion on the old Yahoo group but I can't search that at work (if it's still there). I think there's some notes somewhere other than the entry (in the front or the back) pertaining to such cases, but I can't remember the details.
Allan Harmer
Enthusiast
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
Location: Petersfield (Hants)

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Allan Harmer »

Richard Adams wrote:
James Robinson wrote:
Allan Harmer wrote:Round 5: 3, 10, 8, 1, 100, 50. Target: 735.

RR: 735. 8-1=7x(100+(10/2)) (10)
Unless, I'm not mistaken, Allan, there is no 2 in the selection, or there is something wrong with the working out.
I think that James is not not mistaken (apart from about negatives), and that this should probably read:

RR:735. 8 - 1 = 7 x (100 + (50/10) ) (10)
Quite right chaps - thanks for the spot.

I have now corrected above.

Cheers!
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Derek Hazell »

Jon Corby wrote:This came up in CoC XII as I recall, as someone played it against Conor and he wondered whether it should have been allowed. I think there was a brief discussion on the old Yahoo group but I can't search that at work (if it's still there).
What is the correct thing to say in these situations? Oh yeah, "don't say I never do anything for you, Jon! Ha ha ha"
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Charlie Reams »

For those that can't read the old group, here's the text:
Mike Brown wrote:
Conor Travers wrote: R9 S T N A O E M O S
C1: STAMENS (7)
C2: SOONEST (7)
DC:
OT: MOONSETS (8) Sandie and Chris P. That was a bad miss, and soonest
shouldn't actually be allowed, even though it sounds perfectly fine,
as it is only listed in the ODE as an adverb.
Ah, another quirk of the ODE, I'm afraid. There is, of course, nothing
actually wrong with SOONEST as a word, although the Countdown rules
technically disallow it (unless they've been changed recently). The
"Inflection" section of the appendix clearly states:

Adverbs that take -er and -est in preference to (or as well as) more and
most are:

* adverbs that are not formed with -ly but are identical in form to
corresponding adjectives (e.g. runs faster, hits hardest, hold it
tighter).

* some independent adverbs (e.g. often and soon).

This section also mentions that words like shallow take -er and -est,
but the main section doesn't list them. I wish the book wasn't so
infuriatingly contrary, but then maybe that's all part of the fun :)

Mike.
That answers the question from a validity-on-Countdown perspective, but lexically I'm still baffled.
User avatar
Alec Rivers
Devotee
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
Contact:

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Alec Rivers »

Charlie Reams wrote:No one has ever explained to me how SOON, which is an adverb not an adjective, is allowed to have comparative and superlative forms.
Doesn't it apply to any adverb not ending in -LY?

I ran fast
He ran faster
She ran fastest

Have you been waiting long?
She has been waiting longer
I have been waiting longest
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Friday 23 October. Series 61, Prelim 70

Post by Charlie Reams »

Alec Rivers wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:No one has ever explained to me how SOON, which is an adverb not an adjective, is allowed to have comparative and superlative forms.
Doesn't it apply to any adverb not ending in -LY?

I ran fast
He ran faster
She ran fastest

Have you been waiting long?
She has been waiting longer
I have been waiting longest
Those too, yes, but soon is never an adjective ("come to my soon party"). Also, why do some adjectives become adverbs without modification? Hmm.
Post Reply