Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Official forum of apterous.org, the website which allows you to play against other people over the Internet.
Post Reply

Which of these formats would you prefer?

Poll ended at Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:12 pm

Two 9-round games
5
45%
One custom game (described below)
4
36%
I would play either
2
18%
I would play neither
0
No votes
These are fine, but really you want... (fill in below)
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 11

Andrew Feist
Enthusiast
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm

Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Post by Andrew Feist »

So I'm sketching out my plans for the Apterous Winter Closed (coming relatively soon!), and I want to include a "Speed Demon" side event. I've come up with a couple different formats, and I thought I'd see which one has more support outside of my fevered imagination.

Option 1: Each match would consist of two speed-9 games (or perhaps a speed 9 and a speed 9 goat, or a speed 9 and a speed 9 junior, or et cetera).

Option 2: Each match would be a "custom" round of 4 speed standard word rounds, 4 speed goat rounds, 4 speed junior rounds, 4 speed goat junior rounds, and 4 speed standard number rounds. Winners only scoring (so each section would count the same).

So: pick and choose above. If you've got some other format you're dying to see, post that too.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Post by Charlie Reams »

Andrew Feist wrote: Option 2: Each match would be a "custom" round of 4 speed standard word rounds, 4 speed goat rounds, 4 speed junior rounds, 4 speed goat junior rounds, and 4 speed standard number rounds. Winners only scoring (so each section would count the same).
Colour me stupid but, I don't understand this at all.
User avatar
Kieran Child
Enthusiast
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Post by Kieran Child »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Andrew Feist wrote: Option 2: Each match would be a "custom" round of 4 speed standard word rounds, 4 speed goat rounds, 4 speed junior rounds, 4 speed goat junior rounds, and 4 speed standard number rounds. Winners only scoring (so each section would count the same).
Colour me stupid but, I don't understand this at all.
Basically what he's saying is each match would be a "custom" round of 4 speed standard word rounds, 4 speed goat rounds, 4 speed junior rounds, 4 speed goat junior rounds, and 4 speed standard number rounds. Winners only scoring (so each section would count the same).
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Post by Matt Morrison »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Andrew Feist wrote: Option 2: Each match would be a "custom" round of 4 speed standard word rounds, 4 speed goat rounds, 4 speed junior rounds, 4 speed goat junior rounds, and 4 speed standard number rounds. Winners only scoring (so each section would count the same).
Colour me stupid but, I don't understand this at all.
I think the confusion might be rising from Andy not understanding the Full Custom game, and that to do what is described above you would have to play a minimum of 4 custom games in order to accommodate all those rounds, not just one. That's possibly the confusion, although admittedly Feist usually knows what he's talking about so that'd perhaps be an uncharacteristic mess-up.

So a total of 20 rounds, with 1 point to the victor of each round, most points over the whole 20 wins. It would be a mess though having to conduct each "match" over 4 or 5 games, so not an option for me.
Andrew Feist
Enthusiast
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm

Re: Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Post by Andrew Feist »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Andrew Feist wrote: Option 2: Each match would be a "custom" round of 4 speed standard word rounds, 4 speed goat rounds, 4 speed junior rounds, 4 speed goat junior rounds, and 4 speed standard number rounds. Winners only scoring (so each section would count the same).
Colour me stupid but, I don't understand this at all.
I think the confusion might be rising from Andy not understanding the Full Custom game, and that to do what is described above you would have to play a minimum of 4 custom games in order to accommodate all those rounds, not just one. That's possibly the confusion, although admittedly Feist usually knows what he's talking about so that'd perhaps be an uncharacteristic mess-up.
That's almost certainly the confusion. Obviously if I had tried to set up such a game before I set up the poll I probably would have worded it differently, as in four custom games, <description here>.

I'm guessing this is one case where my fevered imagination turned into hallucinations.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Which would you rather play? (tournament planning)

Post by Matt Morrison »

Andrew Feist wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:I think the confusion might be rising from Andy not understanding the Full Custom game, and that to do what is described above you would have to play a minimum of 4 custom games in order to accommodate all those rounds, not just one. That's possibly the confusion, although admittedly Feist usually knows what he's talking about so that'd perhaps be an uncharacteristic mess-up.
That's almost certainly the confusion. Obviously if I had tried to set up such a game before I set up the poll I probably would have worded it differently, as in four custom games, <description here>.

I'm guessing this is one case where my fevered imagination turned into hallucinations.
Cool. Glad I was on the money. Yeah you can mix up numbers, letters, and conundrum rounds to your hallucinating heart's content, but only one variant and stuff at a time, so speed, speed goat, speed junior, and speed goat junior would all have to be played in different games.
Post Reply