Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Darren Carter
What a lot of bling
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Darren Carter »

Will Jeff build on his one win? Will Rachel be accidentally called Carol?

Exciting stuff.....
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Darren Carter wrote:Will Rachel be accidentally called Carol?
Somehow, Darren, I don't think that bit is going to be broadcast.
User avatar
Ian Dent
Devotee
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Ian Dent »

One more day.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Derek Hazell »

Darren Carter wrote:Will Jeff build on his one win? Will Rachel be accidentally called Carol?
That's not one of those "Is this a spoiler? Is the pope a Nazi?" type of double-questions is it? :mrgreen:
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Going for a final consonant instead of a vowel in round 1 would have given a second T for GARROTTE. As it was, GARRET was there as a DC-equaller.
User avatar
Phil Makepeace
Acolyte
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Makepeace »

R2: TAILORS
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Phil Makepeace wrote:R2: TAILORS
My dad got that. GARTER and GRATER were words I kicked myself for not getting in round 1.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

MINUTED round 6.
User avatar
Phil Makepeace
Acolyte
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Makepeace »

CONSOLER in R7. And SPREADS in R8.
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

My Dad got PARADES as well- those 3 rounds from 6 to 8 were probably my worst 3 rounds so far in my Countdown/Apterous life. And yes, I was looking for the O for EBONISED in round 9.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Phil Reynolds wrote:Going for a final consonant instead of a vowel in round 1 would have given a second T for GARROTTE. As it was, GARRET was there as a DC-equaller.
Isn't GARROTTE there with only 1 T. I'm only asking because when I go to the recordings, i bring the Countdown Dictionary with me, not the OED, before anyone asks, and in it is GARROTE.

So, if it's not a word, it must be American spelling, because the front cover is of the beige set and back then American spellings were still allowed.

It probably American spelling, but whoever did that dictionary can't properly be working on the show, as there were quite a few words that you could never get on the show such as PZAZZ!

I was thinking at first that everyone had a sort of mental block at the start for missing GARROTE and then TAILORS straight afterwards!
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

I always thought it was GAROTTE. A poor numbers miss from me as well- extend my worst ever rounds of Countdown/Apterous from rounds 6-10, bar EBONISED.

Second alt:
75+3=78
78*7=546
546-8+3=541.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

James Robinson wrote:Isn't GARROTTE there with only 1 T.
Wouldn't it be great if there was some sort of tool that would answer these questions for you...
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:I always thought it was GAROTTE.
Yep, which is what I originally spotted, but it seems GARROTTE is in as an alternative spelling.
Bob De Caux
Enthusiast
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:18 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Bob De Caux »

I got GARROTE in the audience, as I always thought it had three variant spellings. In the OED it's the US spelling though.
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

I had PREHEAT but when Phil declared a 5, and with PREHEAT potentially being hyphenated, I played safe with 6.
User avatar
Phil Makepeace
Acolyte
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Makepeace »

DAEMONS for 7 in R13 as well.
Aaron Higgs
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Aaron Higgs »

NOYADES round 13
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Derek Hazell »

Phil Reynolds wrote:Wouldn't it be great if there was some sort of tool that would answer these questions for you...
The closest Phil will ever get to channelling Charlie.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Darren Carter
What a lot of bling
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Darren Carter »

Still can't believe Jeff (Stelling, not Burgin!) was allowed to get away with the DOND joke, was very funny though. As was the letter that he read out at the start. :)
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by James Robinson »

DAEMONS in round 13.

Alternative to 2nd numbers:

75 x 7 = 525

3 + 3 - 4 = 2

2 x 8 = 16

525 + 16 = 541
JackHurst
Series 63 Champion
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by JackHurst »

GARROTTE is the spelling in the oed
GAROTTE is an alternate spelling
garrote is an alternate US spelling
garote is not in at all.

I get incredibly confused when any of these words are available in a selection.
Martin Smith
Acolyte
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:12 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Martin Smith »

I knew SOMEONE would say 'Carol' eventually. Good play on PREHEAT there Jeffrey, I didn't see it.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jon Corby »

Martin Smith wrote:I knew SOMEONE would say 'Carol' eventually. Good play on PREHEAT there Jeffrey, I didn't see it.
So who did say 'Carol', and when, and what happened please?
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Jon Corby wrote:
Martin Smith wrote:I knew SOMEONE would say 'Carol' eventually. Good play on PREHEAT there Jeffrey, I didn't see it.
So who did say 'Carol', and when, and what happened please?
It was Phil's first letters game. He said "Can I have a consonant please, Car...", which was then followed by a slight hush in the audience and him apologise and criticising himself for saying it in the place.

It probably explains why he just said "Consonant, please" or "Vowel, please", just to make sure he didn't add Carol.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jon Corby »

James Robinson wrote:
Jon Corby wrote:
Martin Smith wrote:I knew SOMEONE would say 'Carol' eventually. Good play on PREHEAT there Jeffrey, I didn't see it.
So who did say 'Carol', and when, and what happened please?
It was Phil's first letters game. He said "Can I have a consonant please, Car...", which was then followed by a slight hush in the audience and him apologise and criticising himself for saying it in the place.

It probably explains why he just said "Consonant, please" or "Vowel, please", just to make sure he didn't add Carol.
Aw bless, and within minutes he was 24-0 down. Probably not all he was hoping it would be...
Simon Myers
Enthusiast
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:41 am
Location: Stamford, Connecticut

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Simon Myers »

Martin Smith wrote:I knew SOMEONE would say 'Carol' eventually.
It's happened loads; I've personally seen it happen twice in the studio. The best was during Kirk's second heat game where his hapless opponent tried to cover it up by claiming she "hadn't put her glasses on" :lol:
They tend to get edited out to save embarrassment though.
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Jon Corby wrote:So who did say 'Carol', and when, and what happened please?
I reckon he said it deliberately to try and be 'funny'. His 'horror' at saying it seemed a little too staged to be true for me, plus the reaction of Jay the floor manager sounded as if he's seen it done so many times before.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jon Corby »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Jon Corby wrote:So who did say 'Carol', and when, and what happened please?
I reckon he said it deliberately to try and be 'funny'. His 'horror' at saying it seemed a little too staged to be true for me, plus the reaction of Jay the floor manager sounded as if he's seen it done so many times before.
Ah okay. Funnily enough, I did wonder that too, there was something about him. I retract my earlier "bless". Is this the smallest u-turn ever etc etc
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Jon Corby wrote:Ah okay. Funnily enough, I did wonder that too, there was something about him. I retract my earlier "bless". Is this the smallest u-turn ever etc etc
I felt that too, all the other contestants that day were great and really sociable, but he looked really pissed off when he lost and buggered off after our show. I'm sure Darren said that Phil kept saying he thought he would do really well or something in the Green Room as well.
User avatar
Darren Carter
What a lot of bling
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Darren Carter »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Jon Corby wrote:Ah okay. Funnily enough, I did wonder that too, there was something about him. I retract my earlier "bless". Is this the smallest u-turn ever etc etc
I felt that too, all the other contestants that day were great and really sociable, but he looked really pissed off when he lost and buggered off after our show. I'm sure Darren said that Phil kept saying he thought he would do really well or something in the Green Room as well.
No I said I thought he would do well as he was coming up with some good words whilst watching the BdC v Simon game.
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Darren Carter wrote:No I said I thought he would do well as he was coming up with some good words whilst watching the BdC v Simon game.
Oh ok, my bad. Still, he wasn't a patch on you or Bobo.
User avatar
Lesley Jeavons
Enthusiast
Posts: 320
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Lesley Jeavons »

Is the third numbers possible? 1-3-4-5-6-100 - 938

thanks ~ L x
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jon Corby »

Lesley Jeavons wrote:Is the third numbers possible? 1-3-4-5-6-100 - 938

thanks ~ L x
It's not Lesley. 1 away is the best you can get. Jeffrey did 937, and 939 is also achievable.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:Jay the floor manager sounded as if he's seen it done so many times before.
I bet he has, the saucy minx.
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Peter Mabey »

JackHurst wrote:GARROTTE is the spelling in the oed
GAROTTE is an alternate spelling
garrote is an alternate US spelling
garote is not in at all.

I get incredibly confused when any of these words are available in a selection.
... and, to add to the confusion, all are in SOWPODS, (& GARROT too :!: )
User avatar
Lesley Jeavons
Enthusiast
Posts: 320
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
Location: Brighton, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Lesley Jeavons »

Jon Corby wrote:It's not Lesley. 1 away is the best you can get. Jeffrey did 937, and 939 is also achievable.
Thanks. I only give up once I hear from one of you - if you say it's impossible then I believe it is. :-)
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

I actually had fan mail delivered to my school - 2 sides of A4 and a picture drawn by this guy. He's 27 and has aspergers syndrome and basically said it was extremely important that I had his phone number. Anyway he said he had a friend who would appear on Countdown on 17th September and he told him to wear his green tie (which is what you saw at the beginning - the reference to the green tie). Anyway this guy then ordered me to wear certain clothing next time I'm on including his green tie. Hmmm...
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Kirk Bevins wrote:I actually had fan mail delivered to my school - 2 sides of A4 and a picture drawn by this guy. He's 27 and has aspergers syndrome and basically said it was extremely important that I had his phone number. Anyway he said he had a friend who would appear on Countdown on 17th September and he told him to wear his green tie (which is what you saw at the beginning - the reference to the green tie). Anyway this guy then ordered me to wear certain clothing next time I'm on including his green tie. Hmmm...
Still, Kirk, maybe only one step away from girls throwing their undies at you?
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Kirk Bevins wrote:Anyway this guy then ordered me to wear certain clothing next time I'm on including his green tie.
What did it involve besides the tie?
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Phil Reynolds wrote: What did it involve besides the tie?
It didn't.

Interestingly enough, I've also had some weird 'fan mail', although it's more Facebook mail- whilst I don't mind the pretty girls, I am a bit disturbed by those who keep adding me and saying 'I saw you on the tv and you looked kinda cool but I'm not a creep so I thought to myself I'll add him and talk to him but I'm not a weirdo but anyway I really really hope you stay on the tv so I can watch but not like a freak ahahaha.'
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote: What did it involve besides the tie?
It didn't.

Interestingly enough, I've also had some weird 'fan mail', although it's more Facebook mail- whilst I don't mind the pretty girls, I am a bit disturbed by those who keep adding me and saying 'I saw you on the tv and you looked kinda cool but I'm not a creep so I thought to myself I'll add him and talk to him but I'm not a weirdo but anyway I really really hope you stay on the tv so I can watch but not like a freak ahahaha.'
I think girls are more confident than blokes about stuff like that, and I reckon, just take a punt - and probably only a small percentage of them will be actual freaks.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Awesome, I got a max - 2 today.

Also, I wouldn't have said your surname rhymes with virgin.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Ben Hunter »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote: What did it involve besides the tie?
It didn't.

Interestingly enough, I've also had some weird 'fan mail', although it's more Facebook mail- whilst I don't mind the pretty girls, I am a bit disturbed by those who keep adding me and saying 'I saw you on the tv and you looked kinda cool but I'm not a creep so I thought to myself I'll add him and talk to him but I'm not a weirdo but anyway I really really hope you stay on the tv so I can watch but not like a freak ahahaha.'
Think of the clunge, lad. The clunge!
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

I got a max game today too, Kai.

Yes Jeff, I got loads of facebook add requests, mainly from men though. A few girls tried adding me but most of them were in relationships or were like 40. I suppose beggars can't be choosers though! I had one guy on holiday in York who went past my school, recognised the name and dropped in and asked at reception to see me and shake my hand. Sadly I was teaching all afternoon so never got to meet him. This is the first bit of actual mail I've received though.

Phil, without copying exactly what he's put as the sentences are mixed up a little, he said he'd like me to wear a nice tie like a plain green tie or a loud colourful tie or a striped tie or a couple of nice blazers.

He also says he wants me to go for the cross to give 1 large and 5 small, or 3 large and 3 small from opposite corners.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Kirk Bevins wrote:I got a max game today too, Kai.
Oops, I was trying to say that I got a max minus 2 :oops: :twisted:
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Ben Hunter wrote:Think of the clunge, lad. The clunge!
I didn't say I didn't add them, I just said they were weird. Clunge > everything else. :P

I'm very interested to see how many old dears come up to me at Waitrose tomorrow and tell me they saw me. I just want one- is that too much to ask?
User avatar
Ian Dent
Devotee
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Ian Dent »

How long will you be in Waitrose for?
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Ian Dent wrote:How long will you be in Waitrose for?
Until 12.30, I'm usually in an hour longer but I have to leave early for a footie match- Finchley Road if anyone's passing through.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Ben Hunter wrote:Think of the clunge, lad. The clunge!
I didn't say I didn't add them, I just said they were weird. Clunge > everything else. :P

I'm very interested to see how many old dears come up to me at Waitrose tomorrow and tell me they saw me. I just want one- is that too much to ask?
Just after saying 'clunge > everything else' That's a strange box to want to tick.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Jeffrey Burgin
Acolyte
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Jeffrey Burgin »

Sue Sanders wrote:Just after saying 'clunge > everything else' That's a strange box to want to tick.
I wasn't suggesting the two were related, but then again I'm not confirming they aren't. ;)
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:Just after saying 'clunge > everything else' That's a strange box to want to tick.
I wasn't suggesting the two were related, but then again I'm not confirming they aren't. ;)
:lol:
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 17th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Kai Laddiman wrote:I wouldn't have said your surname rhymes with virgin.
Jeffrey assured us on Wednesday that it doesn't and that from Thursday Jeff would be pronouncing it correctly. Weirdly, he hasn't.
Post Reply