Favourite Platonic Solid
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Favourite Platonic Solid
Or, another excuse to talk about cubes.
Last edited by Michael Wallace on Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4554
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Octahedra are butters lol
- Sue Sanders
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Whitstable Kent
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I like Octagonals (I design many a garden with an octagonal patio) so I voted for an Octo-thingyMichael Wallace wrote:Or, another excuse to talk about cubes.
I don't want to talk about cubes though. And I'm a bit all dried out on the Religion poll at the moment.
I'm going to talk swedes with Ian Volante.
Byeeeeee
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Fool's top.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- Sue Sanders
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Whitstable Kent
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Ian and I have exhausted swedes so I've returned and also voted for Raccoon. I might start introducing secret raccoons into my garden designs.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Fool's top.
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Bucky Ball for me
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
You're a fan of interpenetration?Peter Mabey wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Great ... hedron.png
I prefer the spiky one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Small ... hedron.png. Used to have one on my desk.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
My favourite for interpenetration is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compo ... ahedra.pngRosemary Roberts wrote:You're a fan of interpenetration?Peter Mabey wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Great ... hedron.png
I have made a model, but it's now lost.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Just a quick note to say I've set this poll to finish on Saturday, so that we'll have a definitive answer.
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Agreed! I had one of those as well but it got crushed in a move. All that survives of our collection was a very boring series of successively trucated tetrahedra. I will have to persuade him-that-does-the precision-engineering to make another 5-tetrahedra.Peter Mabey wrote:My favourite for interpenetration is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compo ... ahedra.pngRosemary Roberts wrote:You're a fan of interpenetration?Peter Mabey wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Great ... hedron.png
I have made a model, but it's now lost.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I saw a nice STEP question once that basically asked you to prove that there were exactly five Platonic solids. And now, 5 years later, I can't remember how to do it at all.
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I had a lecture on it at Leeds.Charlie Reams wrote:I saw a nice STEP question once that basically asked you to prove that there were exactly five Platonic solids. And now, 5 years later, I can't remember how to do it at all.
I can recall some of it, heres a shabby explanation.
Its do do with how the internal angles of the shape you are using for the faces can add up to less then 360
Each face must be a regular polygon, and all the faces must be the same.
You must have at least 3 faces meeting at a vertex to form a polyhedron
So at each vertex thee corners of the faces that meet must add up to less then 360 degrees.
For triangular faces you can have 3, 4, or 5 meeting at a vertex
For square faces you can only have 3 meeting at a vertex
For pentagonal faces you can only have 3 meeting at a vertex
For Hexagonal you can have 3 meeting
For heptagonal you can't have 3 because the internal angles of 7 heptagon vertices is more then 360.
3 triangles at a vertex is a tetrahedron, i think 4 triangles at a vertex is the octahedron, 3 squares at one vertex is the cube, 3 pentagons at each vertex is the dodecahedron, and 5 triangles at each is the icosahedron. (Dunno if i've matched these bits up right, i was just getting)
How did you do when you sat the step Charlie?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Let's just say my grades were good enough to get into the Unseen University.JackHurst wrote:How did you do when you sat the step Charlie?
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I think this proves that there are no more than 5, but doesn't establish that all five possibilities lead to a regular polygon. But university was a long time ago.JackHurst wrote:I had a lecture on it at Leeds.Charlie Reams wrote:I saw a nice STEP question once that basically asked you to prove that there were exactly five Platonic solids. And now, 5 years later, I can't remember how to do it at all.
I can recall some of it, heres a shabby explanation.
Its do do with how the internal angles of the shape you are using for the faces can add up to less then 360
Each face must be a regular polygon, and all the faces must be the same.
You must have at least 3 faces meeting at a vertex to form a polyhedron
So at each vertex thee corners of the faces that meet must add up to less then 360 degrees.
For triangular faces you can have 3, 4, or 5 meeting at a vertex
For square faces you can only have 3 meeting at a vertex
For pentagonal faces you can only have 3 meeting at a vertex
For Hexagonal you can have 3 meeting
For heptagonal you can't have 3 because the internal angles of 7 heptagon vertices is more then 360.
3 triangles at a vertex is a tetrahedron, i think 4 triangles at a vertex is the octahedron, 3 squares at one vertex is the cube, 3 pentagons at each vertex is the dodecahedron, and 5 triangles at each is the icosahedron.
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Is this something to do with the naughty step we hear so much about? Are toddlers supposed to study solid geometry now?JackHurst wrote:How did you do when you sat the step Charlie?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I gather from breeding friends of mine that a toddler's first manufacture of solids is regarded as some kind of cause for celebration.Rosemary Roberts wrote:Are toddlers supposed to study solid geometry now?
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
True, but geometric figures didn't use to be a requirement. Is this the next Olympic sport?Phil Reynolds wrote:I gather from breeding friends of mine that a toddler's first manufacture of solids is regarded as some kind of cause for celebration.Rosemary Roberts wrote:Are toddlers supposed to study solid geometry now?
(Well done Phil, managing to get your friends to breed! Most of ours have remained stubbornly uncooperative.)
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:08 am
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Dinos said "Bucky Ball for me "
Yes - me too! Just try naming it though.....
Yes - me too! Just try naming it though.....
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am
- Location: Seated at a computer
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Not being a mathematician (or knowledgeable type) I didn't know what "platonic solid" meant until reading this thread. Now I do... I feel educated.
Phil's mention of baby solids reminds me of a Hale & Pace sketch from the early 90s, where an unbelievably precious and pretentious couple, who are new parents, are at a dinner party. They change every topic of conversation to their precious new baby Joshua, oblivious that everyone else finds the minutae of little Joshy's routine utterly tiresome and uninteresting. The punchline occurs when they receive dessert - a chocolate mousse - and gush "ooh look - it's just the same colour as little Joshy's faeces"...
...and what's worse, people like this do exist. I have had to suffer at least one conversation with friends about their new offspring's excreta.
And don't get me started on people who have "baby on board" signs in the back of their vehicles.
Phil's mention of baby solids reminds me of a Hale & Pace sketch from the early 90s, where an unbelievably precious and pretentious couple, who are new parents, are at a dinner party. They change every topic of conversation to their precious new baby Joshua, oblivious that everyone else finds the minutae of little Joshy's routine utterly tiresome and uninteresting. The punchline occurs when they receive dessert - a chocolate mousse - and gush "ooh look - it's just the same colour as little Joshy's faeces"...
...and what's worse, people like this do exist. I have had to suffer at least one conversation with friends about their new offspring's excreta.
And don't get me started on people who have "baby on board" signs in the back of their vehicles.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
You breed your own friends?Phil Reynolds wrote:I gather from breeding friends of mine
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Matt Bayfield, what do you think of people who have "Baby On Board" signs in their car?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I'm afraid those that are so inclined do so without encouragement from me. In fact, I try to persuade them not to as it means we probably won't see them socially for another 15 years or so.Rosemary Roberts wrote:Well done Phil, managing to get your friends to breed!
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
No, I find it's easier to adopt other people's.Kai Laddiman wrote:You breed your own friends?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am
- Location: Seated at a computer
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Bait accepted, Jon. The following rant to be taken with a pinch of salt. I'm sure it will at least mildly offend someone so I'll make my apology for the offence, but not my opinion, in advance.
[off-topic rant]
Utterly ridiculous things, "baby on board"/"child on board" signs. Ostensibly marketed as a safety feature (i.e. if we have an accident, please look for a child in the wreckage - as if the emergency services wouldn't do so anyway!), but in reality marketed to, and displayed by, parents who wish to give the message "aren't we wonderful, because we have made a baby". As if that, in itself, is something remarkable and unusual. Seriously, fellow parents, be justifiably proud when you've raised a child to be of good character and a valued member of society, but regardless of any biological misfortune you may have, don't expect me to give you any credit before then just for having knocked one out, okay?
And in case anyone's not convinced, the marketing as a safety feature is definitely a sham, because I don't know anyone who takes the sign out when travelling without their children.
As you can probably guess, I don't have a "child on board" sign in my car.
[/off-topic rant]
[off-topic rant]
Utterly ridiculous things, "baby on board"/"child on board" signs. Ostensibly marketed as a safety feature (i.e. if we have an accident, please look for a child in the wreckage - as if the emergency services wouldn't do so anyway!), but in reality marketed to, and displayed by, parents who wish to give the message "aren't we wonderful, because we have made a baby". As if that, in itself, is something remarkable and unusual. Seriously, fellow parents, be justifiably proud when you've raised a child to be of good character and a valued member of society, but regardless of any biological misfortune you may have, don't expect me to give you any credit before then just for having knocked one out, okay?
And in case anyone's not convinced, the marketing as a safety feature is definitely a sham, because I don't know anyone who takes the sign out when travelling without their children.
As you can probably guess, I don't have a "child on board" sign in my car.
[/off-topic rant]
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
True, but without them we'd never have had the Be Sharps' greatest hit.Matt Bayfield wrote:Utterly ridiculous things, "baby on board"/"child on board" signs.
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I always understood them to mean "if you are going to crash into another car, please do not choose this one." Which is not likely to be very effective - given that it is addressed to people who are not looking where they are going.Matt Bayfield wrote:Utterly ridiculous things, "baby on board"/"child on board" signs.
The emergency services are likely to be guided by the presence of a child seat. And if the child is lucky, by the loud screams.
- Sue Sanders
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Whitstable Kent
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Don't forget the equally irritating ' "Mum-to-be" on board'Matt Bayfield wrote: Utterly ridiculous things, "baby on board"/"child on board" signs.
Totally unconnected, but I'm reminded that in last night's Eggheads', Dermot advised the challengers that they had the opportunity to 'knock one more out in the final round' .don't expect me to give you any credit before then just for having knocked one out, okay?
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Fool's top.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I guess that's one way to beat off the opposition.Sue Sanders wrote:Dermot advised the challengers that they had the opportunity to 'knock one more out in the final round' .
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3974
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Chris Hughes has a shiny enough head already.Charlie Reams wrote:I guess that's one way to beat off the opposition.Sue Sanders wrote:Dermot advised the challengers that they had the opportunity to 'knock one more out in the final round' .
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Kubrick's Rube
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
That is very, very good indeed. I like the fact that you can solve it in two ways: all squares on each face the same colour, or all squares on each face the same film.Matt Morrison wrote:Kubrick's Rube
Edit: actually, maybe you can't. I've identified six films from the visible squares, but there are some images I don't recognise, so unless they're from one of the films I've already spotted, there are more than six.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I see the poll's finished. Icosahedron is disqualified for...something or other.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- Joseph Krol
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:47 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Go Icosahedrons! The thing which has the most twentysidedness that I know of.
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
i like dodecahedrons best cos once in maths my teacher said what are dodecahedrons (and we'd never heard of em before) and someone in my class said its a type of sauce isnt it like brown sauce (lol) so teacher obv laughed and said no this is a maths lesson and another person said is it a 3D 12 sided shape and teacher said yeah well done and my friend was gonna say that too so she went DOH DOH DOH and then everyone just started saying DOH!-DECAHEDRON DOH!-DECAHEDRON (the teacher was luckily outside classroom answering phone and we werent doing the DOH!-DECAHEDRON thing too loud so she didnt notice we were doing it) and it was so funny and i was just sitting there staring at everyone like what on earth...!
One Direction are my life. <3
"The reason for life is to find out who you are"
"It always seems impossible until it's done"
Love loads of celebs to be honest... Might marry Nicky Maccy
"The reason for life is to find out who you are"
"It always seems impossible until it's done"
Love loads of celebs to be honest... Might marry Nicky Maccy
- Thomas Carey
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:17 pm
- Location: North-West of Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
I'll say dodecahedrons because tetrahedrons and icosahedrons have the most/least sides so they don't count, cubes are way too common and octahedrons have no purpose.
cheers maus
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
GO DODECAHEDRONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
One Direction are my life. <3
"The reason for life is to find out who you are"
"It always seems impossible until it's done"
Love loads of celebs to be honest... Might marry Nicky Maccy
"The reason for life is to find out who you are"
"It always seems impossible until it's done"
Love loads of celebs to be honest... Might marry Nicky Maccy
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Not so! How would you make one of these without them?Thomas Carey wrote:octahedrons have no purpose.
- Thomas Carey
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:17 pm
- Location: North-West of Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Stick a load of square based pyramids together.Rosemary Roberts wrote:Not so! How would you make one of these without them?Thomas Carey wrote:octahedrons have no purpose.
cheers maus
- Joseph Krol
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:47 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
Haha good answer.Thomas Carey wrote:Stick a load of square based pyramids together.Rosemary Roberts wrote:Not so! How would you make one of these without them?Thomas Carey wrote:octahedrons have no purpose.
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Favourite Platonic Solid
That might qualify as an engineering solution, but hardly a mathematical model.Thomas Carey wrote:Stick a load of square based pyramids together.