Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Martin Gardner »

I like Rachel's dress. Having said that, I thought the black cocktail dress with the tan boots a few days ago was a bit odd.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Martin Gardner »

Aha it's another FUNNEST style one. Does it specify the double M?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Martin Gardner »

Another 792 would be:

8 * 3 * 4 = 96
96 + 3 = 99
99 * 8 = 792
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Rory MacDonald
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:12 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Rory MacDonald »

outroar for the round where orator was the best they could do
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Martin Gardner »

Rory MacDonald wrote:outroar for the round where orator was the best they could do
I think you've confused outrage and uproar; outroar isn't there.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Mike Brailsford
Acolyte
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: Blackpool, England
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Mike Brailsford »

COAXER for 6 too ?
User avatar
Mike Brailsford
Acolyte
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: Blackpool, England
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Mike Brailsford »

Is BODYMASS 1 or 2 words ?
John Brackstone
Rookie
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by John Brackstone »

samoyeds for 8
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Rd 14 numbers (25-1)x(6+4)x3+2
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

John Brackstone wrote:samoyeds for 8
Soz but it's capitalised. SOMEDAY as equaller.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Mike Brailsford wrote:COAXER for 6 too ?
Yeh I got that too.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Jimmy Gough »

ROTAMERS is an equaller
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Jimmy Gough wrote:ROTAMERS is an equaller
...and REARMOST. I had a 13 max game today, was quite pleased (missed TAGMEMES which I missed yesterday in practice too and 722). Neil looks very hard to dethrone and I make the max of today's game to be 115, which is very low. This isn't helped by 6 small numbers and in the most part 3 vowel or 5 vowel selections by Neil.

Neil, what is your thinking behind the 5 vowel strategy?
Jojo Apollo
Devotee
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:29 am

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Jojo Apollo »

They used to have TEAROOMS as a single word didn't they?

What are the rules that govern whether a word stays a single word or broken into two words/hyphened and vice-versa?
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Ben Hunter »

Kirk Bevins wrote:Neil, what is your thinking behind the 5 vowel strategy?
Neil Zussman wrote:You could argue that I should've been trying to maximise my score, but I wasn't really thinking like that. Part of me was convinced that everyone I played against would be a genius, and so as soon as I got a small lead I played it ultra safe (such as picking 5 vowels to ensure that, even if they beat me, they'd only get 5 or 6 points). It never dawned on me that I'm not *that* bad, so maybe I could extend my lead. :oops: Pessimism rules. :D
Also, I quite wanted to see a round where there was nothing greater than a 3 or something low like that, so if the first 4 consonants were rubbish I generally picked lots of vowels...
User avatar
Neil Zussman
Enthusiast
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Neil Zussman »

Cheers, Ben was just about to give Kirk a nudge in the direction of that post myself :) Although maybe rather than pessimism, I should've written paranoia rules.

I'm relieved I avoided a crucial conundrum today, I must say...
Hannah O
Acolyte
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:15 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Hannah O »

That conundrum was interesting! Was it just me or were the Teatime Teasers more difficult than usual today? I could have just been on bad form...
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Martin Gardner »

Hannah O wrote:That conundrum was interesting! Was it just me or were the Teatime Teasers more difficult than usual today? I could have just been on bad form...
The BAGPIPER one, you just have to switch the two vowels. PS APPETISE in the NAPPIEST round.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Kathleen Batlle
Acolyte
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Kathleen Batlle »

Great game again today Neil, congratulations.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

I noticed today that Jeff asked Neil to declare first on a round which he picked. Usually Jeff asks player 2 to declare on player 1s pick and vice versa. It's annoying sometimes if he's not consistent as if you wanted to risk a word or not, it's nice to know who is going to be asked first.
User avatar
Richard Priest
Devotee
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Richard Priest »

Martin Gardner wrote: APPETISE in the NAPPIEST round.
I thought that too Martin but it's not in which I was a bit surprised about considering APPETISER is.
User avatar
Julie T
Kiloposter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: Hertfordshire, England

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Julie T »

Another great game, Neil! :)
OT I got GAMETES in round 4, REARMOST in 7, and COAXER in 11.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
John Brackstone
Rookie
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by John Brackstone »

Kai rightly said that samoyeds is capitalised ( a member of a people of northern siberia). but in my dictionary there is also an entry spelt without a capital s (a dog of a white arctic breed)
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

John Brackstone wrote:Kai rightly said that samoyeds is capitalised ( a member of a people of northern siberia). but in my dictionary there is also an entry spelt without a capital s (a dog of a white arctic breed)
Which dictionary is that?
John Brackstone
Rookie
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Spoilers and comment for Friday 20/02/2009

Post by John Brackstone »

The dictionary I use is the concise oxford dictionary ninth edition. The entry for Samoyed is:
Samoyed n.1 a member of a people of northern Siberia. 2 the language of this people.
3 (also samoyed) a a dog of a white Arctic breed. b this breed [Russian samoed]
Post Reply