Official thread of scrag
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7823
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Official thread of scrag
Yes.Ryan Taylor wrote:The worst ever choice between a consonant or a vowel pick?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13641
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
Pity - you might have got WANKERE.Ryan Taylor wrote:The worst ever choice between a consonant or a vowel pick?
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
Apparently my memory for conundrum answers doesn't quite extend as far as 16 minutes...
Mount Conundrum game
My next game
I recognised the jumble immediately then spent 30 seconds failing to remember what it unscrambled to.
Mount Conundrum game
My next game
I recognised the jumble immediately then spent 30 seconds failing to remember what it unscrambled to.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:20 am
Re: Official thread of scrag
I used to have a Stickie on my old computer with a whole list of conundrums I came up with…one of them was DEAR SHAPE / SPEARHEAD. Then one time I actually had it in a game…I forget what the scramble was, but I thought "hey, DEAR SHAPE…I know the answer to that one…wait, what was it?"Graeme Cole wrote:I recognised the jumble immediately then spent 30 seconds failing to remember what it unscrambled to.
- James Hall
- Acolyte
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:26 pm
- Location: Portsmouth
- Contact:
Re: Official thread of scrag
______________
___________
________
_____
__
___________
________
_____
__
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Official thread of scrag
Set 4 new high scores in a week and none of them will even make it to the voting stage for GOTW because they're not in the top 5 for number of nominations.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4564
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Official thread of scrag
Good.Adam Gillard wrote:Set 4 new high scores in a week and none of them will even make it to the voting stage for GOTW because they're not in the top 5 for number of nominations.
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
Christmas Like.Jon O'Neill wrote:Good.Adam Gillard wrote:Set 4 new high scores in a week and none of them will even make it to the voting stage for GOTW because they're not in the top 5 for number of nominations.
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
How did this thread fall so far? One can't be as his best without being able to laugh at his worst.
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=460977
Eight! Eight disallowed words! Ah ah ah ah
Notable rounds include R6, where I didn't even have a valid 4, round 7 where I actually had a safe 7 but was somehow confident enough in that for some reason to declare it instead, and R8, where I had PALLETS written but didn't think that was how it was spelled for some reason (I was thinking of the wooden planks you put stuff on, not the taste for food). I also like R12, where I got that 8 easily, saw the D, figured I needed a 9 and went for it, and it turns out there was a -ED 9 there anyways. Ah well.
EDIT: I also noticed the last game I played against Niall I managed 5 disallowed words in the last 7 letters, meaning I'm 5 for my last 18 in being able to speak English against him. Are you , like, a wizard or something?
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=460977
Eight! Eight disallowed words! Ah ah ah ah
Notable rounds include R6, where I didn't even have a valid 4, round 7 where I actually had a safe 7 but was somehow confident enough in that for some reason to declare it instead, and R8, where I had PALLETS written but didn't think that was how it was spelled for some reason (I was thinking of the wooden planks you put stuff on, not the taste for food). I also like R12, where I got that 8 easily, saw the D, figured I needed a 9 and went for it, and it turns out there was a -ED 9 there anyways. Ah well.
EDIT: I also noticed the last game I played against Niall I managed 5 disallowed words in the last 7 letters, meaning I'm 5 for my last 18 in being able to speak English against him. Are you , like, a wizard or something?
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Official thread of scrag
Reminds me of this (N)guy(en).Steve Balog wrote:One can't be as his best without being able to laugh at his worst.
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=460977
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
On a brighter note you hopefully learnt 2 invaluable falseagrams in CARDIOS^=SARCOID and MOISTURED^=MISROUTED which I think most players fall into the trap of making early doors, same goes for CARDIOES^=IDOCRASE and LOCATERS^=CROTALES to name a couple.Steve Balog wrote:How did this thread fall so far? One can't be as his best without being able to laugh at his worst.
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=460977
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
Pop quiz: You have the following numbers left on the input screen of a hypernums game where the target is 9352:
1330 25 7 4 1 3
Solve this game.
Hint: 1330x7=9310.
How does your decision change when this is round 20 of a game you're on for a max in?
EDIT: I botched round 20 on track for a 200 two more times before getting it... wtf me
1330 25 7 4 1 3
Solve this game.
Hint: 1330x7=9310.
How does your decision change when this is round 20 of a game you're on for a max in?
EDIT: I botched round 20 on track for a 200 two more times before getting it... wtf me
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Official thread of scrag
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:13 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
Were you tanking for a better draft pick?Mark Deeks wrote:It was a blitz, OK?
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Official thread of scrag
I'm flattered that you'd think I needed to make a conscious effort to be terrible.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3114
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
I was once beaten by the Duellist.
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Official thread of scrag
This game should have been one for the brag thread. I did a 4L attack and was on 190 after 19 rounds. I've had a few 4L attack maxes but never 200 so this was my chance. And then I missed an absolute sitter!
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=752437
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=752437
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
Here is the list of most max games, by format. I'm tied for the most max numbers attacks.
This and this are my first two attempts of the day to get #22
fml I am such a choke artist
EDIT: looked again at game 2 after twitch closing the window in disgust and suddenly (((25*5)-3)*7)-50 within 3 seconds on a 2nd glance go me
EDIT2: WOW ARE YOU ACTUALLY SERIOUS I think I'm just going to curl up and sob quietly to myself and what I've become
EDIT3: alright I did finally get it and it was half 3L which is pretty cool but still damn I wish I'd gotten the all 3L game that would've nailed it in style
This and this are my first two attempts of the day to get #22
fml I am such a choke artist
EDIT: looked again at game 2 after twitch closing the window in disgust and suddenly (((25*5)-3)*7)-50 within 3 seconds on a 2nd glance go me
EDIT2: WOW ARE YOU ACTUALLY SERIOUS I think I'm just going to curl up and sob quietly to myself and what I've become
EDIT3: alright I did finally get it and it was half 3L which is pretty cool but still damn I wish I'd gotten the all 3L game that would've nailed it in style
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: Redcar, UK
- Contact:
Re: Official thread of scrag
You won't be heading that leaderboard for long Mr. Balog
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
Well right now I'm playing a 1,000 round 2L game vs. Prime, winning by a decent amount right now but I'm not even at 90% maxed. I am getting a lot of crappy rounds (stuff with two 1s, all even smalls + large odd target, and bad absolute modulo 5* setups) though so I think this might start to go back up. Point is I won't be trying to max any more games for a while so you can take it back pretty quickly
though I can max 2L NAs with pretty regular frequency now -- with a 92% round max rate that's almost 19% of games maxed. So if you ever decide to take that record back, I'll be there to challenge for it
*how far away a number is from the nearest multiple of 5. So, all larges, 5 and 10 are AM5 0; 1, 4, 6, 9 are AM5 1; and 2, 3, 7, 8 are AM5 2. Rounds with a target that's AM5 number doesn't match any of the numbers in the selection tend to be deceptively hard to get via conventional means.
though I can max 2L NAs with pretty regular frequency now -- with a 92% round max rate that's almost 19% of games maxed. So if you ever decide to take that record back, I'll be there to challenge for it
*how far away a number is from the nearest multiple of 5. So, all larges, 5 and 10 are AM5 0; 1, 4, 6, 9 are AM5 1; and 2, 3, 7, 8 are AM5 2. Rounds with a target that's AM5 number doesn't match any of the numbers in the selection tend to be deceptively hard to get via conventional means.
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: Redcar, UK
- Contact:
Re: Official thread of scrag
I'm going to have a load of games against Plum today to try and get the 6-small max game. I already have max games for 1-large, 2-large and 3-large in 20 round games. Think I'm quite a bit off achieving the 4-large max game though.
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
oooh, good luck with that, I've had a few 19s myself but have yet to get it, got 3L a bit ago but it was a double max vs. PrimeMartin Long wrote:I'm going to have a load of games against Plum today to try and get the 6-small max game. I already have max games for 1-large, 2-large and 3-large in 20 round games. Think I'm quite a bit off achieving the 4-large max game though.
I've also had a 197 in 4L with 200 max but the round I missed was itself pretty scraggish (6 3 -> 922). I think you can get 4L too if you try
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
- Jennifer Steadman
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:34 pm
- Location: Kent
- Contact:
Re: Official thread of scrag
If I was into erotic asphyxiation, I'd be majorly getting off on this choke.
"There's leaders, and there's followers, but I'd rather be a dick than a swallower" - Aristotle
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Official thread of scrag
Ouch! And double ouch given that this is one of your aims in your interview with Charlie. And treble ouch for missing out on being only the 7th person to do it. And quadruple ouch for failing to be the first female to achieve this. And quintuple ouch, because, well, you suck.Jennifer Steadman wrote:If I was into erotic asphyxiation, I'd be majorly getting off on this choke.
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
if this is how I play when I get home from work I may as well just let my subscription expire ffs
seriously this is pig disgusting
seriously this is pig disgusting
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
- Steve Balog
- Acolyte
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
- Location: neither here nor there
Re: Official thread of scrag
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=1024033
Max a round only 5 people get spot-on, finish in the bottom third.
Smooth move, Ex-Lax.
Max a round only 5 people get spot-on, finish in the bottom third.
Smooth move, Ex-Lax.
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3114
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm