Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1098
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Philip A »

The last of the 40th anniversary month of wonderul guest hosts before Colin Murray returns at least for another 3 months and a bit.
Series 78 Runner-up
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1098
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Philip A »

QUARKING was there. QUARK as a verb can be found by typing QUAWKING in ODP which lists quite a few spellings (QUOUK and QUORK).
Series 78 Runner-up
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Kiloposter
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Kind of surprised TARING^ isn't in as a verb form of TARE tbh - taring a scale (resetting it to zero) was commonplace in uni chemistry labs.
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
Steve Hyde
Acolyte
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 4:29 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Steve Hyde »

Philip A wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 2:54 pm QUARKING was there. QUARK as a verb can be found by typing QUAWKING in ODP which lists quite a few spellings (QUOUK and QUORK).
That's really interesting. I wonder if Susie would be able to find it in the heat of a match? There was a similar thing with JIMMY earlier in the series (listed as an alternate spelling of JEMMY in the dictionary, but a search would only bring up the capitalised and therefore invalid Jimmy)
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1098
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Philip A »

Steve Hyde wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 8:01 pm
Philip A wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 2:54 pm QUARKING was there. QUARK as a verb can be found by typing QUAWKING in ODP which lists quite a few spellings (QUOUK and QUORK).
That's really interesting. I wonder if Susie would be able to find it in the heat of a match? There was a similar thing with JIMMY earlier in the series (listed as an alternate spelling of JEMMY in the dictionary, but a search would only bring up the capitalised and therefore invalid Jimmy)
I think any Lexicographer would need a prompt so I doubt she’d have found it by herself. This list may be of interest: https://wiki.apterous.org/Hard-to-find_words
Series 78 Runner-up
Toby McDonald
Kiloposter
Posts: 1097
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:23 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Toby McDonald »

R14 LNAFP: (8+4)*7*10 = 840
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13275
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

I hope you all noticed Rachel saying that the 314 was as easy as pi.
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Kiloposter
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Gavin Chipper wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 3:49 pm I hope you all noticed Rachel saying that the 314 was as easy as pi.
She was only 310.858047 off the mark with that pun.
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
User avatar
L'oisleatch McGraw
Devotee
Posts: 930
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
Location: Waterford
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by L'oisleatch McGraw »

Rachel would want to cop herself on with the stern referee habit she's picked up in the last year or two.
1000-47 is actually NOT an identical method to 1000-50+3.
He should not have had to show over his paper.
Last edited by L'oisleatch McGraw on Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
:arrow: :arrow: :arrow: S:778-ochamp
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2038
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Graeme Cole »

L'oisleatch McGraw wrote: Fri Dec 02, 2022 1:20 pm Rachel would want to cop herself on with the stern referee habit she's picked up in the last year or two.
1000-47 is actually NOT and identical method to 1000-50+3.
He should not have had to show over his paper.
Close enough to ask them to show their paper, I think.

FWIW, Quantum Tombola treats them as the same solution, biased though I may be.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13275
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 25 November 2022 (Series 86, Heat 115)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

We've discussed this before and there is a certain degree of subjectivity in deciding whether solutions are identical. You could say that 100+3+2 and 100+2+3 are identical or not, depending on your exact criteria. The two methods mentioned are certainly close enough that some people might consider them to be the same solution.
Post Reply