R3 Alt: 5*100-7*8-3
R4 Two sevens I didn’t get
R5 IDEATUM
R6 Alt: (50+1)*10-100/2-2
R7 OPALINES, but OPALINE = milk-glass which is a mass noun, the plural needs explicit ruling from @Countdown Team
R10 Alts DURZI, DURUM
R11 PLAUDITOR
Studio lighting better in this filming block also. It’s not overlit nor hazy.
Spoilers for Friday 24th September 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 64)
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Friday 24th September 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 64)
Series 78 Runner-up
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13330
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for 24 September 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 64)
There was a numbers that was easier than Rachel made out - 150×3+8 or something.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:23 pm
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:05 am
Re: Spoilers for 24 September 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 64)
r9 alt: (100+50)*(1+2)+10-2 = 458
r14 alt: (50+9)*6-4-3-2 = 345
r14 alt: (50+9)*6-4-3-2 = 345
- Ian Fitzpatrick
- Devotee
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Wimborne, Dorset
Re: Spoilers for 24 September 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 64)
Still catching up with last week's shows but on 4HD the lighting looks very wishy-washy, I am considering going back to Ch4 standard to see if it makes a difference. Susie's dress in two days time looks fine!
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers for 24 September 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 64)
Agreed - I think it's the RBM issue, because it's also the same on the title sequence. It's like there's a light grey filter on it.