30 seconds...
- Lesley Jeavons
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
30 seconds...
Firstly, appologies if this has ever been discussed before... can't be arsed looking back over 11 pages for now...
How beneficial do people find 30 seconds for coming up with an answer?
With numbers games, I usually have the answer within ten seconds if straightforward, and it takes me well over 30 if it's a tricky one. Similarly with letters, whatever first jumps out at me tends to stick with me and I come up with nothing more in seconds 10-30. Also a conundrum will either present itself to me without even trying, or I don't get it.
What do other people think? Do you tend to get your best answer almost immediately? What would mind specialists say? Could this initial good answer be because our brain works more effectively in the first few seconds of being presented with a situation? Could it be a bit like in an exam when you're urged to, if in doubt, 'go with your first answer' as often pondering leaves time for doubt and error...
What I'm saying is, if we were to play an imaginary game of 'quick fire Countdown' we'd probably all score similarly than if we were given the whole 30 seconds. Agreed or not? Discuss.
How beneficial do people find 30 seconds for coming up with an answer?
With numbers games, I usually have the answer within ten seconds if straightforward, and it takes me well over 30 if it's a tricky one. Similarly with letters, whatever first jumps out at me tends to stick with me and I come up with nothing more in seconds 10-30. Also a conundrum will either present itself to me without even trying, or I don't get it.
What do other people think? Do you tend to get your best answer almost immediately? What would mind specialists say? Could this initial good answer be because our brain works more effectively in the first few seconds of being presented with a situation? Could it be a bit like in an exam when you're urged to, if in doubt, 'go with your first answer' as often pondering leaves time for doubt and error...
What I'm saying is, if we were to play an imaginary game of 'quick fire Countdown' we'd probably all score similarly than if we were given the whole 30 seconds. Agreed or not? Discuss.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Disagreed. Although my apterous 10 second games (or even 5 second games) are much better than average, they don't compare to my 30 second games. I might spot URINATES instantly but know that I can use the spare N for a nine and sometimes it takes me about 15 seconds to remember what it is - SATURNINE.Lesley Jeavons wrote:Firstly, appologies if this has ever been discussed before... can't be arsed looking back over 11 pages for now...
How beneficial do people find 30 seconds for coming up with an answer?
With numbers games, I usually have the answer within ten seconds if straightforward, and it takes me well over 30 if it's a tricky one. Similarly with letters, whatever first jumps out at me tends to stick with me and I come up with nothing more in seconds 10-30. Also a conundrum will either present itself to me without even trying, or I don't get it.
What do other people think? Do you tend to get your best answer almost immediately? What would mind specialists say? Could this initial good answer be because our brain works more effectively in the first few seconds of being presented with a situation? Could it be a bit like in an exam when you're urged to, if in doubt, 'go with your first answer' as often pondering leaves time for doubt and error...
What I'm saying is, if we were to play an imaginary game of 'quick fire Countdown' we'd probably all score similarly than if we were given the whole 30 seconds. Agreed or not? Discuss.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: 30 seconds...
All the evidence from not-so-imaginary apterous games is that people play much worse with 10 second rounds, and anything less than that is just stupidly bad. But some people are affected less than others (eg Conor doesn't seem to suffer much at all) and you might be one of those. If you think you might be then it's easy enough to find out.Lesley Jeavons wrote:What I'm saying is, if we were to play an imaginary game of 'quick fire Countdown' we'd probably all score similarly than if we were given the whole 30 seconds. Agreed or not? Discuss.
Re: 30 seconds...
From apterous I play a bit worse at 10 secs than 30, but not too much. Things go downhill rapidly once I get to 5 secs though.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
I play much worse at 3 second rounds (obviously) but can still get a respectable score:
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10677
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10677
Re: 30 seconds...
WOMEN, BODICE, CAVE, RAPING.Kirk Bevins wrote:I play much worse at 3 second rounds (obviously) but can still get a respectable score:
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10677
You make me sick
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Jealous?Jon Corby wrote:WOMEN, BODICE, CAVE, RAPING.Kirk Bevins wrote:I play much worse at 3 second rounds (obviously) but can still get a respectable score:
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10677
You make me sick
Re: 30 seconds...
At risk of stating the obvious, 30 seconds gives 3 times as long to work at it. The exam analogy isn't really relevant, as there's relatively little possibility of doubt in Countdown - you've either got a solution or you haven't, and if you haven't, the extra time to find one can only be useful.
Numbers - you have time to try two or three approaches to the solution instead of just 1 approach.
Letters - having found the straightforward 6, you have 20 seconds left to aim higher. And also you have longer to consider the various prefixes or suffixes - eg. un-, under-, de-, -ed, re-, -er all appear in the same set of letters and you can't look at all that lot in 10 seconds.
Numbers - you have time to try two or three approaches to the solution instead of just 1 approach.
Letters - having found the straightforward 6, you have 20 seconds left to aim higher. And also you have longer to consider the various prefixes or suffixes - eg. un-, under-, de-, -ed, re-, -er all appear in the same set of letters and you can't look at all that lot in 10 seconds.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
I usually see words developing as the letters are put up on the board and, if there's an obvious 7 or 8, I've very often got it by the time the clock starts. However, when that doesn't happen and I have to start from scratch with the clock, it can take a lot longer. In an apterous game yesterday I was looking at PARADES as my best shot until about 27 secs, then suddenly realised I could also use the I to make PARADISE which I entered just in time.
What I often find is that a common prefix or suffix such as -ING, -IEST or -LESS leaps out at me straight away and I spend about 20 secs trying to use that before giving up and having to start again - which is harder when you're consciously trying to ignore that prospect.
What I often find is that a common prefix or suffix such as -ING, -IEST or -LESS leaps out at me straight away and I spend about 20 secs trying to use that before giving up and having to start again - which is harder when you're consciously trying to ignore that prospect.
- Richard Brittain
- Series Champ
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:11 pm
- Location: Belgium
Re: 30 seconds...
No. I often spot things late. 30 seconds is good.
- Matthew Green
- Devotee
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: 30 seconds...
I genuinely think I play slightly better in 10-second games. The pressure seems to bring words out of me.
Im still pretty crap at both types though...
Im still pretty crap at both types though...
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: 30 seconds...
I'm a total retard. 45 seconds please!
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Not compared with me, Dinos. I'd rather have 45 minutes.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: 30 seconds...
I think with the letters, it takes them more than 30 seconds to put the letters up anyway. The problem with 10 second rounds in Apterous duels is that the computer takes about 3 seconds to pick 9 letters, and that isn't long. Usually if I pick 8 letters on Apterous and they're good letters, I've already come up with some possible nines before I even pick the letter, so if that letter comes, I can get an instant nine. Quite often with nines I can spot them in about 2 seconds like I would a conundrum, but you also have to write the words down an Apterous, if it were just a question of spotting the words, 10 seconds is fine by me. For numbers, I'm quite weak but the easy ones can be solved in about 5 seconds, and the hard ones I can't get them at all, so I couldn't do the numbers in 10 seconds, but the letters is fine by me.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: 30 seconds...
I'm a suffix player, looking for stuff to put in front of -ING and -TION, this usually takes up about 15 seconds, though sometimes I'll spot a word straight away. These are usually the cooler words, like FISTULAR
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: 30 seconds...
I think as people have said, Apterous is quite an artificial situation. A 10-second round on that makes a lot more difference (unless the person picks quite slowly which they normally don't) than a 10-second round would in the television game, where you can sit and work out words while the letters are going up.
In the numbers game, you don't have the same situation as the target is revealed at the end, but even then with Apterous you have to fiddle around declaring your target within the time if it's not spot on and that takes the same absolute time, so a higher proportion of time, in shorter rounds.
So with both numbers and letters, shortening the time in Apterous would make more difference than in "real life".
In the numbers game, you don't have the same situation as the target is revealed at the end, but even then with Apterous you have to fiddle around declaring your target within the time if it's not spot on and that takes the same absolute time, so a higher proportion of time, in shorter rounds.
So with both numbers and letters, shortening the time in Apterous would make more difference than in "real life".
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: 30 seconds...
Lesley, first may I say that you never introduced yourself to us? Please feel free to introduce yourself!
About your question, the subject of this thread is what makes the game so engaging... or at least I think so!
About your question, the subject of this thread is what makes the game so engaging... or at least I think so!
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Sorry Jason, but I think you will find that Lesley has introduced herself and a rather big introduction as well if I do say so myself . Infact it was Lesley's first post on the forum.Jason Larsen wrote:Lesley, first may I say that you never introduced yourself to us? Please feel free to introduce yourself!
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: 30 seconds...
You're obsessed with people introducing themselves in the introduction thread!Jason Larsen wrote:Lesley, first may I say that you never introduced yourself to us? Please feel free to introduce yourself!
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: 30 seconds...
Sorry, Joseph!
What if they raise the thinking time to one minute next year?
What if they raise the thinking time to one minute next year?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
I'd shoot myself.Jason Larsen wrote:Sorry, Joseph!
What if they raise the thinking time to one minute next year?
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: 30 seconds...
Kirk!
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: 30 seconds...
Unlike studio conditions, which are ubiquitous in nature.Gavin Chipper wrote:I think as people have said, Apterous is quite an artificial situation.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: 30 seconds...
Well, Charlie, we like it!
- Lesley Jeavons
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Thanks for all your thoughts, and giving me an insight in to how your brains work (as if I'm not getting an idea by reading your posts! ). I'm glad it works differently for us all, which makes us all so unique and interesting.
And I'm glad my first go at starting a new thread didn't go down like a lead balloon.
Finally, as I've not ventured into the Apterous world at all, thanks for not whipping my ass for not knowing that you're all already partaking in quickies.
And I'm glad my first go at starting a new thread didn't go down like a lead balloon.
Yes, I went there first, just by chance, phew. As after seeing you lot maul a newbie, dare they post elsewhere first (even if accidental ), I'm flippin' glad I did!Joseph Bolas wrote:Sorry Jason, but I think you will find that Lesley has introduced herself and a rather big introduction as well if I do say so myself . Infact it was Lesley's first post on the forum.Jason Larsen wrote:Lesley, first may I say that you never introduced yourself to us? Please feel free to introduce yourself!
Finally, as I've not ventured into the Apterous world at all, thanks for not whipping my ass for not knowing that you're all already partaking in quickies.
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Jason (no-one else) just has this thing where if someone hasn't introduced themselves, he will call them on it but you should feel free to post wherever you want to firstLesley Jeavons wrote:Yes, I went there first, just by chance, phew. As after seeing you lot maul a newbie, dare they post elsewhere first (even if accidental ), I'm flippin' glad I did!
- Lesley Jeavons
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
Oh, I thought they were referred to as 'trolls' or something?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:26 pm
- Location: Ilkeston, Derbyshire
Re: 30 seconds...
WOW! My family think I'm a Countdown freak just because I watch it every day and record it too just in case someone comes to the door or the phone rings and I might miss a few seconds. But you lot are scary!!
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: 30 seconds...
Re: Apterous, I know if I'm playing a bot and the first 8 letters spell out STRAINER, then I'm probably going to spend at least a minute working out what nines I can get with a vowel or consonant. There's no rule against this although I think I'd consider it unethical against a human opponent, it's hard to feel guilty when you're playing a computer! I think maybe 10 seconds to choose the last letter on Apterous would be sufficient - I know when playing Hypercountdown you can just choose 11 letters then spend a minute looking at 11 (of a possible 12) letters and then choose the last one at that point - this should be dealt with.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: 30 seconds...
No, posting without introducing yourself first doesn't make you a troll. Posting without introducing yourself and posting in a clearly inappropriate forum and spending the whole of your first post pretending to complain about things that have never actually happened on the show - that makes you a troll.Lesley Jeavons wrote:Oh, I thought they were referred to as 'trolls' or something?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: 30 seconds...
It is the "natural" setting for Countdown.Charlie Reams wrote:Unlike studio conditions, which are ubiquitous in nature.Gavin Chipper wrote:I think as people have said, Apterous is quite an artificial situation.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: 30 seconds...
Possibly. I'm going to the Apterous forum tp ost something. See you there.Martin Gardner wrote:Re: Apterous, I know if I'm playing a bot and the first 8 letters spell out STRAINER, then I'm probably going to spend at least a minute working out what nines I can get with a vowel or consonant. There's no rule against this although I think I'd consider it unethical against a human opponent, it's hard to feel guilty when you're playing a computer! I think maybe 10 seconds to choose the last letter on Apterous would be sufficient - I know when playing Hypercountdown you can just choose 11 letters then spend a minute looking at 11 (of a possible 12) letters and then choose the last one at that point - this should be dealt with.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3969
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: 30 seconds...
I think I do better relative to others at ten seconds, but worse marginally than at 30s. I'll have to trawl my results and see.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles