Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Toby McDonald
Enthusiast
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:23 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Toby McDonald » Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:01 pm

CONOID in R2

R3 Alt.: (75*9)+25
R6 Alt.: ((75+25+7)*4)+5

Howie Myers
Rookie
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:05 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Howie Myers » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:05 am

r13 alt - LEOTARD
r14 alt - (4*7*25) + (10*10) + 2

User avatar
Ian Fitzpatrick
Enthusiast
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
Location: Wimborne, Dorset

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Ian Fitzpatrick » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:26 am

Howie Myers wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:05 am
r13 alt - LEOTARD
r14 alt - (4*7*25) + (10*10) + 2
shush not allowed to mention leotard, they're erasing history on channel 4.
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum

Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Gavin Chipper » Thu Oct 08, 2020 8:17 pm

I'm not sure Rachel should give clues by saying "That's a good start" when someone starts their numbers solution.

Sam Cappleman-Lynes
Acolyte
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:30 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Sam Cappleman-Lynes » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:14 pm

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 8:17 pm
I'm not sure Rachel should give clues by saying "That's a good start" when someone starts their numbers solution.
It's not really a clue though is it? Clearly they already think it's a good start or they wouldn't have gone that way.

Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Gavin Chipper » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:17 pm

Sam Cappleman-Lynes wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:14 pm
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 8:17 pm
I'm not sure Rachel should give clues by saying "That's a good start" when someone starts their numbers solution.
It's not really a clue though is it? Clearly they already think it's a good start or they wouldn't have gone that way.
Well, they might be unsure, and she only says it when she's seen how to do it with the same start.

Sam Cappleman-Lynes
Acolyte
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:30 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Sam Cappleman-Lynes » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:27 pm

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:17 pm
Sam Cappleman-Lynes wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:14 pm
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 8:17 pm
I'm not sure Rachel should give clues by saying "That's a good start" when someone starts their numbers solution.
It's not really a clue though is it? Clearly they already think it's a good start or they wouldn't have gone that way.
Well, they might be unsure, and she only says it when she's seen how to do it with the same start.
This is a true statement, but I don't see how it provides any assistance to the contestant.

Saying "good start" is equivalent to saying "it is possible to reach the target from this position" and that really has to be your working assumption anyway when you're giving your solution, unsure or otherwise.

User avatar
L'oisleatch McGraw
Enthusiast
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
Location: Waterford
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by L'oisleatch McGraw » Thu Oct 08, 2020 10:23 pm

Sam Cappleman-Lynes wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:27 pm
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:17 pm
Sam Cappleman-Lynes wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:14 pm


It's not really a clue though is it? Clearly they already think it's a good start or they wouldn't have gone that way.
Well, they might be unsure, and she only says it when she's seen how to do it with the same start.
This is a true statement, but I don't see how it provides any assistance to the contestant.

Saying "good start" is equivalent to saying "it is possible to reach the target from this position" and that really has to be your working assumption anyway when you're giving your solution, unsure or otherwise.
Yep... Sam has done the heavy lifting here.
Just to add a note of surprise that people can find fault with anything Rachel does on Countdown. I find her presenting / comments / jokes etc. always right on point.
:arrow: :arrow: :arrow: S:778-ochamp

Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 7th October 2020 (Series 82, Prelim 130)

Post by Gavin Chipper » Thu Oct 08, 2020 10:32 pm

Sam Cappleman-Lynes wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:27 pm
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:17 pm
Sam Cappleman-Lynes wrote:
Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:14 pm


It's not really a clue though is it? Clearly they already think it's a good start or they wouldn't have gone that way.
Well, they might be unsure, and she only says it when she's seen how to do it with the same start.
This is a true statement, but I don't see how it provides any assistance to the contestant.

Saying "good start" is equivalent to saying "it is possible to reach the target from this position" and that really has to be your working assumption anyway when you're giving your solution, unsure or otherwise.
I don't think it's the worst thing ever but sometimes contestants are blagging or semi-blagging and correct themselves sometimes so I could imagine someone saying "Plus ... six? No, five?" depending on how Rachel reacts.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jon O'Neill and 15 guests