Spoilers for Friday June 15th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 109)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Friday June 15th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 109)

Post by Jordan F »

I will not call Jonathan what Nick calls him because I don't want to make him feel young, but Mr. Rawlinson is on quite the run, averaging 114 points per show in his four games. Will it continue with the 5th win? A win will leap frog him into the number 6 spot, and the only way he can stay number 8 is if he loses by 29 or less. It's the end of Saira Khan, and my instinct is that she and Nick would have been a better pair than her and Susie, but certainly I have seen far worse guests.

Join Thomas for the recap later.
Jack Worsley
Series 66 Champion
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 15th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 109

Post by Jack Worsley »

1st numbers: (100-3)x(75/25)x2-50 = 532
Last edited by Jack Worsley on Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jack Worsley
Series 66 Champion
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 15th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 109

Post by Jack Worsley »

2nd numbers: ((25+2)x10-8)x3 = 786
Michael Cullen
Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:34 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 15th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 109

Post by Michael Cullen »

Got the second numbers Jack's way, although with a time lapse.
User avatar
Jennifer Steadman
Kiloposter
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Kent
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 15th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 109

Post by Jennifer Steadman »

Got the first numbers Jack's way, with no time lapse.

Terribly slow conundrum solve there. Appalling, really.
"There's leaders, and there's followers, but I'd rather be a dick than a swallower" - Aristotle
Post Reply