Arithmetic

All discussion relevant to Countdown that is not too spoilerific. New members: come here first to introduce yourself. We don't bite, or at least rarely.
Post Reply
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Arithmetic

Post by Peter Mabey »

Has it been stated that fractions are not allowable in the numbers round?
For example in the last round yesterday (August 25th) the target was 342, from 100,75,50,25,5,1.
Could one have said (75+1)x(5-25/50) ? ;)
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Michael Wallace »

You have to work in integers, or at least you did when I was on the show (it says in the rules the contestants get sent before appearing).

Personally I always liked the idea of using fractions, as well as being able to use the numbers as powers, although that could get a bit silly :P
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Joseph Bolas »

PeterMabey wrote:Has it been stated that fractions are not allowable in the numbers round?
For example in the last round yesterday (August 25th) the target was 342, from 100,75,50,25,5,1.
Could one have said (75+1)x(5-25/50) ? ;)
The rule is that you can not have negative numbers, decimal numbers, fractions, use numbers as powers etc.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Charlie Reams »

Joseph Bolas wrote:The rule is that you can not have negative numbers
Are you sure about that? Negative numbers would never be useful (unlike fractions and powers) but as far as I know it's not invalid.
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Joseph Bolas »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Joseph Bolas wrote:The rule is that you can not have negative numbers
Are you sure about that? Negative numbers would never be useful (unlike fractions and powers) but as far as I know it's not invalid.
I know there have been a few times where Carol has explained the numbers games and I'm sure she said that you couldn't have negative numbers, but my memory ain't that good.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Michael Wallace »

There's someone on here with a fresher memory than mine, I suspect, but I have vague memories of reading in the stuff they send you it mentioning negative numbers, but pointing out that it doesn't really matter because you can always just rephrase your solution so that the negative numbers don't come into it.
User avatar
Damian E
Enthusiast
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:51 am

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Damian E »

Negative numbers and fractions are not allowed.

Somebody once tried to be different by dividing 10 by 4 to make 2.5, but it was swiftly disallowed.
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Peter Mabey »

I agree with the banning of powers, as the problem is to use the four standard operations, whilst negative numbers can always be avoided by a simple rearrangement.
However, it's likely that some combinations of target and given numbers could only be achieved using fractions - my example didn't use the 100, and though there are several solutions using all six, a different sixth number might not give any. :(
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

I thought division was allowed!
Ralph Gillions
Devotee
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: South Yorkshire

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Ralph Gillions »

Jason Larsen wrote:I thought division was allowed!
Yes Jason division is allowed - as long as it does not result in a fraction.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

Would someone please give me an example of division resulting in a fraction?
User avatar
Ben Wilson
Legend
Posts: 4549
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: North Hykeham

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Ben Wilson »

Jason Larsen wrote:Would someone please give me an example of division resulting in a fraction?
3/4=3/4.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

So, Ben, in other words if you say "over" when declaring your solution you probably won't get any points.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13332
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Damian E wrote:Negative numbers and fractions are not allowed.

Somebody once tried to be different by dividing 10 by 4 to make 2.5, but it was swiftly disallowed.
One wonders why he would do this if it's made clear in the rules.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13332
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Ben Wilson wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:Would someone please give me an example of division resulting in a fraction?
3/4=3/4.
Brilliant.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

If you say anything like, 3 over 4, you probably don't get any points. Do you?
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13332
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Jason Larsen wrote:If you say anything like, 3 over 4, you probably don't get any points. Do you?
You won't. Obviously if someone says something like "200 * 3 / 4 = 150" then Carol would grill them about whether the 3/4 was in brackets or whether they meant 600/4, but I think the case would ultimately be judged on how quickly they said each bit and where the pasues were. ;)
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Joseph Bolas »

Gavin Chipper wrote:You won't. Obviously if someone says something like "200 * 3 / 4 = 150" then Carol would grill them about whether the 3/4 was in brackets or whether they meant 600/4, but I think the case would ultimately be judged on how quickly they said each bit and where the pasues were. ;)
I think in that situation, the contestant would most likely say something like 200 x 3 = 600, and then say / 4 = 150.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

Carol is one inquisitive one, isn't she?
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Jason Larsen wrote:If you say anything like, 3 over 4, you probably don't get any points. Do you?
I think you may be getting confused here, Jason. 3/4 (pronounced 3 over 4 or 3 divided by 4) equals three quarters (or three fourths in USA). It's a handy notation and helps people (although in saying this, the majority of kids nowadays struggle to do 3 divided by 4 and don't realise it's three quarters!). You can not have this because it is a fraction.

Saying 8/4 (pronounced 8 over 4 or 8 divided by 4) is allowed as, even though 8/4 is still a fraction (called an "improper" fraction), the answer is 2 (a whole number and not a fraction, like 3/4).

In short, the word "over" IS allowed - just not if the result ends in a number that is not whole (a "fraction")
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Charlie Reams »

You might say that Countdown only allows round naturals, but you should definitely Google that to make sure.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

So, if you use fractions in your answer that is not allowed?
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Jason Larsen wrote:So, if you use fractions in your answer that is not allowed?
Correct. Remember 8/4 is technically still a fraction but I know what you mean - you are only allowed to deal with whole numbers.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

So, in your case, Kirk, it would be, "8 divided by 4."
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Jason Larsen wrote:So, in your case, Kirk, it would be, "8 divided by 4."
Yes it would, but you can say that as "8 over 4" and that is fine. "Over" means divide in this context.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

So, as long as you don't use a fraction, you get points.
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Joseph Bolas »

Jason Larsen wrote:If you say anything like, 3 over 4, you probably don't get any points. Do you?
Jason Larsen wrote:So, if you use fractions in your answer that is not allowed?
Jason Larsen wrote:So, as long as you don't use a fraction, you get points.
It doesn't matter how you word your questions, the answer is always going to be the same.

If you are going to divide two numbers in your solution, you have to make sure that when you divide one number by the other (starting with the larger number first), the result is a whole number (eg 8 / 4 = 2). If it doesn't then, it's never going to be allowed (eg 3 / 4 = 0.75 or 4 / 3 = 1.33333...). Also divided by and over mean the same thing.

So you can have fractions if the end result of the division is a whole number, but not if the end result is a decimal.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Arithmetic

Post by Jason Larsen »

Thank you, Joseph!

Now, I completely understand that!
Post Reply