
I'm curious as to what the thread's resident troll has got to say against him..
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
100% loss rate, amirite?Jon O'Neill wrote:I'm curious as to what the thread's resident troll has got to say against him..
Oh, if only you could have afforded to sign Taylor-Fletcher and DJ Campbell. Or if you had Adams in the midfield instead of Gerrard. You might have been able to compete then.Jon O'Neill wrote:Blaming it all on Benitez is a bit mad. Remember, 8 of the 11 who slaughtered RM 4-0 at Anfield a couple of years ago are still here, and we sent more players to the 2010 WC than any other club in the world. But for 4 or 5 years we have been basically starved of any real investment, and that is really starting to show now. If anything, it goes to show how much of an over-achievement coming 2nd in 2009 was.
I was sad when we at the mighty Huddersfield had to sell Taylor-Fletcher.David Roe wrote:Oh, if only you could have afforded to sign Taylor-Fletcher and DJ Campbell. Or if you had Adams in the midfield instead of Gerrard. You might have been able to compete then.Jon O'Neill wrote:Blaming it all on Benitez is a bit mad. Remember, 8 of the 11 who slaughtered RM 4-0 at Anfield a couple of years ago are still here, and we sent more players to the 2010 WC than any other club in the world. But for 4 or 5 years we have been basically starved of any real investment, and that is really starting to show now. If anything, it goes to show how much of an over-achievement coming 2nd in 2009 was.Is that the investment you had in mind?
This decision was just after the first goal wasn't it? (The one where Torres shot and it was tipped round the post by Hennessey). Given that the home crowd thought the first goal was offside (even though it wasn't), I guess she just felt under pressure to give a decision their way at this point.Jon Corby wrote:She did make an absolute howler of an offside decision in the first half, flagging when the ball was played back to Torres.
I think the comments caught off-mic were before the game had kicked off and I don't think they would risk making comments like that during a game. Big Ron is the man whose best for that.Jon Corby wrote:I had no idea what she had flagged for. I did notice that Andy Gray made no comment whatsoever, it was just silence as if they'd turned the mics off.
Not sure that's the one I'm thinking of, as the ball was right out on the left wing, and I think play was stopped before getting near the goal. But I can't be sure.Ryan Taylor wrote:This decision was just after the first goal wasn't it? (The one where Torres shot and it was tipped round the post by Hennessey).
Oh yeah I know, I wasn't suggesting that was when the comments were made - it was just kinda obvious that Andy Gray wanted to slate her but didn't/couldn't. I wouldn't be surprised if he did say something else off-mic then, but even if he didn't, his "dear, dear me" laugh obviously didn't need any further explanation.Ryan Taylor wrote:I think the comments caught off-mic were before the game had kicked off and I don't think they would risk making comments like that during a game. Big Ron is the man whose best for that.
The main thing (as far as I can tell) is "Can you believe that? A female linesman. Women don’t know the offside rule.". Hardly a huge deal, but I don't really get the "it's the same joke 1000s of people were making up and down the country" line - that makes it more acceptable to make prejudiced remarks?Matt Morrison wrote:Sorry, being lazy - can someone transcribe the joke as I can't be arsed to listen?
It would have been comparable to thisMichael Wallace wrote:I also wonder what the comparable levels of outcry would have been if it had been a remark about someone because they were gay, or if it had been some racial stereotype instead.
Not really relevant but it's Garth crooks so it's funny.Michael Wallace wrote: I also wonder what the comparable levels of outcry would have been if it had been a remark about someone because they were gay, or if it had been some racial stereotype instead.
ExactlyBen Hunter wrote:It would have been comparable to thisMichael Wallace wrote:I also wonder what the comparable levels of outcry would have been if it had been a remark about someone because they were gay, or if it had been some racial stereotype instead.
I love this guy.Ryan Taylor wrote:Not really relevant but it's Garth crooks so it's funny.Michael Wallace wrote: I also wonder what the comparable levels of outcry would have been if it had been a remark about someone because they were gay, or if it had been some racial stereotype instead.
What I mean is that they could easily have just been taking the piss out of the fact that there's such an obvious joke. A bit like that advert where the Englishman, Irishman and Scottishman walk into a pub. I'm pretty sure I made the women/offside rule joke, followed by some manly whooping and waheying for comic effect at some point and I love women, sexually. I'm a feminist.. I believe women should have any mad thing they want (© Peep Show).Michael Wallace wrote: The main thing (as far as I can tell) is "Can you believe that? A female linesman. Women don’t know the offside rule.". Hardly a huge deal, but I don't really get the "it's the same joke 1000s of people were making up and down the country" line - that makes it more acceptable to make prejudiced remarks?
I also wonder what the comparable levels of outcry would have been if it had been a remark about someone because they were gay, or if it had been some racial stereotype instead.
Yeah, I see what you mean. I suppose the trouble is how clearly it comes across either way.Jon O'Neill wrote:What I mean is that they could easily have just been taking the piss out of the fact that there's such an obvious joke.
Yeah, I see what you mean (echo, echo etc.). I was about to start a long-winded post about this, but then realised I really cba clogging up a thread about football. You fucking ginger.Jon O'Racist wrote:Dissing gays and blacks is a bit different because... it just is? Dunno really. It feels like it is different because they are fewer in number and the prejudices are a bit more fresh.
...forwards.Lesley Hines wrote:Two defending players between the attacking player and the goal line when the ball is passed to the attacking player
RoflMatt Morrison wrote:...forwards.Lesley Hines wrote:Two defending players between the attacking player and the goal line when the ball is passed to the attacking player
THIS IS FUCKING AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Jon Corby wrote:So, Saints knock Blackpool out of FA Cup, Blackpool pwn Man Utd, Saints play Man Utd in FA Cup.... hmmm...
Edit: I blame myself for this.
Yeah, it's hard to tell from a 10 second clip. There are some women in my workplace that I'd say that (and worse) to, and some women that I wouldn't. It entirely depends what their relationship is like. It seems fairly apparent that there's a lot more to this than these two incidents - it's either a litany of such offences, a continuous assault on women in his workplace (although that seems unlikely, because we'd most probably have been told about them) or it's most likely that it's to do with him trying to sue Murdoch's NOTW.Andy Wilson wrote:Well, I dunno. In my workplace that wouldn't ever happen and if it did It'd probably make me feel uncomfortable. It was interesting that she seemed to carry a vacant expression afterwards and appeared to be ignoring him. If that was the case then she more than likely felt uncomfortable. He's obviously a proper person of wealth or social standing.
What difference does that make?Martyn Simpson wrote:I'd go as far as putting money on it that she heard more sexist comments from the Wolves and Liverpool players on Saturday.
This seems to fit well with your generally progressive attitude to women.Martyn Simpson wrote:This situation gets even more farcical by the minute.
I wonder if anyone's actually going to bother to ask Sian Massey what she actually makes of it all - I'd go as far as putting money on it that she heard more sexist comments from the Wolves and Liverpool players on Saturday.
A massive own goal by Sky IMO.
That they're not being splashed all over the papers? Sacked by their employers? The fact that The Sun dares to comment on sexism cases like these is just laughable. Do me a favour, love.Michael Wallace wrote:What difference does that make?Martyn Simpson wrote:I'd go as far as putting money on it that she heard more sexist comments from the Wolves and Liverpool players on Saturday.
They're also not being employed for the value of what they say, or acting as the mouthpiece for a broadcasting corporation. And anyway, whatever you think about The Sun, nothing they do could make it retrospectively okay for broadcasters to be sexist.Jon Corby wrote:That they're not being splashed all over the papers? Sacked by their employers? The fact that The Sun dares to comment on sexism cases like these is just laughable. Do me a favour, love.Michael Wallace wrote:What difference does that make?Martyn Simpson wrote:I'd go as far as putting money on it that she heard more sexist comments from the Wolves and Liverpool players on Saturday.
Nor was Andy Gray when he said anything sexist. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a huge Andy Gray fan, and I do get the impression he might possibly be a proper sexist twat, but fuck me if you could sack people based on (what are in effect) private conversations, God help us all (it wasn't even that bad). Me & a mate were discussing this at the coffee machine, and so we've been pointing out every "bad" thing we say since. It's just, like, every conversation.Charlie Reams wrote:They're also not being employed for the value of what they say, or acting as the mouthpiece for a broadcasting corporation. And anyway, whatever you think about The Sun, nothing they do could make it retrospectively okay for broadcasters to be sexist.
FREUD!!!! goal*Matt Morrison wrote:What the fuck? We had a girl incorrectly disallowed for offside... by a fucking man. Wonder what the hell Andy Gray would say about that.