Countdown recap for Friday 2nd May 2008
C1: Champion Peter Davies, (1 win)
C2: Challenger Andy Fawcett
DC: Susie Dent and Keith Barron..
CV: Carol Vorderman
OT: Other words or solutions.
DC: Appearing in numbers rounds is my solution.
GS: Generated solution (numbers round)
R01: R S W E I A T P E
R02: F N R A E I B U T
R03: I O A S T R D G P
R04: E O R Q I E L R M
R05: 100 5 6 3 5 6. Target: 759
TTT: PONGHATE - "Think brides, think sides"
R06: P D M A I O D E B
R07: R T S O A E K C H
R08: T L N I A I E T N
R09: R M E I A N S H L
R10: 25 3 1 8 2 10. Target: 386
TTT: MINDPLUG - "Short and fat, with apple in the middle"
R11: N D S I O E C M D
R12: Z S R A E O L O E
R13: T V R O U A S T N
R14: 50 75 8 10 9 3. Target: 807
R15: F L U F F R E E K (conundrum)
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
R01: R S W E I A T P E
C1: SWEATIER (8)
C2: PARTIES
DC: TAPERS, WIRETAPS (8)
OT: WEARIEST (8), PASTIER, PEATIER, PEEWITS, PIASTRE, PIRATES, PRATIES, REPEATS, RESPITE, SERIATE, SPREITE, SWEATER, TRAIPSE, WAITERS, WARIEST, WEARIES
Score: 8-0 (max 8)
R02: F N R A E I B U T
C1: TRIBUNE (7)
C2: BANTER
DC: URINATE, FAINTER, URBANITE (8)
OT: TAURINE, TURBINE
Score: 15-0 (max 16)
R03: I O A S T R D G P
C1: PARODIST (8)
C2: PASTOR
DC: PAROTIDS (8)
OT: POSTGRAD (8), ASTROID, DISPORT, PAROTID, RAGTOPS, TRIPODS
Score: 23-0 (max 24)
R04: E O R Q I E L R M
C1: MILER (5)
C2: MILER (5)
DC: LORIMER (7)
OT: LOERIE
Score: 28-5 (max 31)
R05: 100 5 6 3 5 6. Target: 759
C1: 759. (100-5)*(5+3)-(6/6) (10)
C2: -x-. nothing declared.
Score: 38-5 (max 41)
PONGHATE -> HEPTAGON
R06: P D M A I O D E B
C1: DAMPED (6)
C2: POMADE (6)
DC: POMADE, ABIDED
OT: POMADED (MGa, 7), ABODED, BADDIE, BODIED, DIADEM
Score: 44-11 (max 48)
R07: R T S O A E K C H
C1: CHOKERS (7)
C2: RACKETS (7)
DC: SHORTCAKE (9)
OT: THORACES, ARCHEST, CHOKRAS, COASTER, EARSHOT, HACKERS, HECTORS, HOCKETS, OCHREAS, ORACHES, RECOATS, RESTOCK, ROACHES, ROCHETS, ROCKETS, SHOCKER, STACKER, STOCKER, TACKERS, TORCHES
Score: 51-18 (max 66)
R08: T L N I A I E T N
C1: TALENT (6)
C2: LENIANT (X) - misspell of LENIENT
DC: ENTAIL
OT: ANILINE (MGr, 7), INNATE, INTEIN, INTENT, LATENT, LATTEN, LINNET, LINTIE, TANNIE, TENANT, TINNIE*
Score: 57-18 (max 73)
A "Tinnie" is a can of beer, though I recall using this word as a child to mean a can of any drink. The term has apparently been used in Scotland to refer to a female specific part of the body. Led to a very confusing conversation with an old Scottish lady one day.
R09: R M E I A N S H L
C1: REMAINS (7)
C2: MARINES (7)
DC: MINERALS (8)
OT: INHALERS (8), HAILERS, HALIERS, HERNIAL, HERNIAS, INHALES, LARNIES, LIMNERS, MAILERS, MANLIER, MARLINE, MARLINS, MENHIRS, MENIALS, MERLINS, MINERAL, MISHEAR, NAILERS, NEARISH, RAILMEN, REALISM, SEMINAL, SEMINAR, SHALIER
Score: 64-25 (max 81)
MINERALS + G,O,U or T produces valid 9's as does INHALERS + G, I or P.. could be worth knowing.
R10: 25 3 1 8 2 10. Target: 386
C1: 386. 8*2*25-10-3-1 (10)
C2: 390. not explained.
Score: 74-25 (max 91)
MINDPLUG -> DUMPLING
R11: N D S I O E C M D
C1: DEMONIC (7)
C2: COSINE
DC: MEDICOS (7), SECOND
OT: DESMOID* (7), DISCOED (7), INCOMES (7), MESONIC (7), MIDDENS (7), NODDIES (7), SECONDI (7)*
Score: 81-25 (max 98)
* DESMOID is a medical term denoting a type of fibrous tumour of muscle and connective tissue. Could also be a robotic presenter pre-programmed to say "Okey Dokey" in between rounds potentially.
* Interestingly SECONDU and SECONDE are also valid. With an A you can have DEACONS of course.
R12: Z S R A E O L O E
C1: LOOSER (6)
C2: RESOLE (6)
DC: AEROSOL (7)
OT: AREOLES (7), ROSEOLA (7) .. AREOLES + H anyone?
Score: 87-31 (max 105)
R13: T V R O U A S T N
C1: SAVOUR (6)
C2: TROUTS (6)
DC: TRUANTS (7)
OT: ATTORNS (7)
Score: 93-37 (max 112)
R14: 50 75 8 10 9 3. Target: 807
C1: 803x. mistake in working.
C2: -x-. nothing declared.
Des: 807. (9*75)+(3*50)-10-8 (10)
DC+CB: 807. (75+9-8)*10+50-3 (10)
Score: 93-37 (max 122)
R15: F L U F F R E E K
C1 buzzes in on 3 seconds and declares......
KERFUFFLE, the only correct answer in the village......... "yeah I know"
Final Score: 103-37 (max 132)
It is notable, and unfortunate, that on this occasion C2 did not find the best word/solution in any round, so could have been defeated 132-0 potentially. Apparently his daughter filled in the form for him, so he might fill one in for her.. If he does let's hope she gets some quality practice in first.
Further summaries are at:
http://www.sooreams.com/cd/series.asp?series=58
[20080502] Friday's game, 2nd May 2008, S58 G84
Moderator: James Robinson
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: [20080502] Friday's game, 2nd May 2008, S58 G84
I have a couple of things to say about that game.
First off, I'm glad that Peter won. That victory was once again very impressive.
But, I think Andy should be brought back because Carol misheard the selection for one of his letters in the second letters round. As his second letter choice in that round, he asked for a vowel and Carol gave him a consonant.
Who thinks he should be brought back?
First off, I'm glad that Peter won. That victory was once again very impressive.
But, I think Andy should be brought back because Carol misheard the selection for one of his letters in the second letters round. As his second letter choice in that round, he asked for a vowel and Carol gave him a consonant.
Who thinks he should be brought back?
Re: [20080502] Friday's game, 2nd May 2008, S58 G84
Nope, I would disagree on both points..Jason Larsen wrote:Carol misheard the selection for one of his letters in the second letters round. As his second letter choice in that round, he asked for a vowel and Carol gave him a consonant.
Firstly during the second round he first asks for a consonant, "then another" and promptly gets a second consonant. Not that there actually is any "choice" as such before 3 vowels and 4 consonants have hit the board, so it makes no difference anyway.
Our challenger lost by such a large margin that it is quite clear that even if a mistake did exist (which, on examination, none appears to have done) it would take many mistakes on many rounds to have any impact on the outcome of the game...
.... It's not like his name's Deshpande or anything.
Dave C.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: [20080502] Friday's game, 2nd May 2008, S58 G84
Jason Larsen wrote:I have a couple of things to say about that game.
First off, I'm glad that Peter won. That victory was once again very impressive.
But, I think Andy should be brought back because Carol misheard the selection for one of his letters in the second letters round. As his second letter choice in that round, he asked for a vowel and Carol gave him a consonant.
Who thinks he should be brought back?
I can't see the relevance, he can just ask for a consonant next time. Besides I know when David Nickeas was the champion in Series 48 he asked for a consonant and got a vowel (or the other way around) and he just said to Carol "I actually asked for a consonant" and she threw the vowel and the floor and picked the next consonant. So if he had noticed he could have asked Carol to change her mind.
Martin
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: [20080502] Friday's game, 2nd May 2008, S58 G84
Thats right, because then when he next asked for a vowel, he asked for the one on the floor, but Carol wouldn't put it back up on the board so picked the next one out of the box.Martin Gardner wrote:I can't see the relevance, he can just ask for a consonant next time. Besides I know when David Nickeas was the champion in Series 48 he asked for a consonant and got a vowel (or the other way around) and he just said to Carol "I actually asked for a consonant" and she threw the vowel and the floor and picked the next consonant. So if he had noticed he could have asked Carol to change her mind.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: [20080502] Friday's game, 2nd May 2008, S58 G84
I'm sorry, I didn't catch that. Legit mistake.