Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Jordan F »

We end this week (on a Friday for once!) with Glen Webb on two wins, though his second was a touch lower than his first. Hopefully no matter how he wins, he'll get a win today and move up to 3.

Join Thomas for the recap later.
Guy Barry
Acolyte
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:12 am

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Guy Barry »

Sorry to keep pointing out errors like this, but are you quite sure you've got the numbers of the preliminary rounds right? 48-51 seem to have come around twice now, and they don't match up with the round numbers in the recaps section.
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Jordan F »

I have to say this. Even if Richard ends up losing by a large margin, UMPTEEN is one of the better spots I've seen in awhile, particularly from a non-apterite, so I'll give him a lot of credit for that.
Jack Worsley
Series 66 Champion
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Jack Worsley »

Another very good performance, Glen, well played.

Slightly odd way for the last numbers: (50+(25+10)/5+1)x7 = 406.
User avatar
Tony Atkins
Fanatic
Posts: 2232
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Tony Atkins »

Jack Worsley wrote:Another very good performance, Glen, well played.

Slightly odd way for the last numbers: (50+(25+10)/5+1)x7 = 406.
I am sad to say I missed this, and UMPTEEN and also MAULERS, but got the rest.
I hope Glen gets a good night's sleep. If so I would expect some more good results from him next week.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
Guy Barry
Acolyte
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:12 am

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Guy Barry »

Jordan F wrote:I have to say this. Even if Richard ends up losing by a large margin, UMPTEEN is one of the better spots I've seen in awhile, particularly from a non-apterite, so I'll give him a lot of credit for that.
Agreed, particularly as he'd scored nothing up to that point.

I had ENCODES as an alternative in round 12 but otherwise nothing of note.
User avatar
Innis Carson
Devotee
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Innis Carson »

Is it just my imagination, or can someone in the audience be heard shouting "YES!" just after Richard says UMPTEEN?
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by James Robinson »

Guy Barry wrote:
Jordan F wrote:I have to say this. Even if Richard ends up losing by a large margin, UMPTEEN is one of the better spots I've seen in awhile, particularly from a non-apterite, so I'll give him a lot of credit for that.
Agreed, particularly as he'd scored nothing up to that point.
Yeah, I loved that one too. Just stuck on the TOUPEE in that round I was. :P

Well odd that both of Glen's conundrum spots were on 28.5 seconds :!: :!: :o :o :P :P (And that yesterday's was on 29.5 seconds too, well bizarre. :P :P :P )

DINGBATS as a brilliant alternative in round 4.
User avatar
Thomas Carey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: North-West of Bradford
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Thomas Carey »

Jordan F wrote: Join Thomas for the recap later.
I mentioned somewhere that I won't be able to do today's or next week's. Andy?
cheers maus
User avatar
Philip Jarvis
Enthusiast
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Philip Jarvis »

Innis Carson wrote:Is it just my imagination, or can someone in the audience be heard shouting "YES!" just after Richard says UMPTEEN?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs
Last edited by Philip Jarvis on Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
User avatar
Philip Jarvis
Enthusiast
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Philip Jarvis »

James Robinson wrote:Well odd that both of Glen's conundrum spots were on 28.5 seconds :!: :!: :o :o :P :P (And that yesterday's was on 29.5 seconds too, well bizarre. :P :P :P )
Oh ... Glen clearly has a solver under the desk then lol ;)
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
User avatar
Andy Platt
Kiloposter
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: Wirral

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Andy Platt »

Ah Tom mentioned on FB that he was too busy for today's and next week's but it was never discussed who should do it.

I can do it tomorrow morning if you like?

And I'll happily do the Giles v Chris/Peter QF or whatevs
User avatar
Andy Platt
Kiloposter
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: Wirral

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by Andy Platt »

No response eh - think I'll just do it at some point today if nobody else commandeers it
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 7th 2013 (Series 68 Prelim 51)

Post by James Robinson »

Andy Platt wrote:No response eh - think I'll just do it at some point today if nobody else commandeers it
Been busy in Preston, so had no chance to respond. :P :mrgreen: :geek: (Not that you need my permission to do it, AP. ;) )
Post Reply