Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Jordan F »

Liam Shaw got his second win yesterday, can he get the third? Will ANCHORITE show up for the third prelim in a row? And when will we ever see 4 large be picked in a prelim again?

Join James for the answer to at least two of these three questions later.
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by John Garcia »

Did anyone else notice the Upside down "S" in the conundrum??? Most disconcerting!
Does anyone know when the last time was there was an upside-down letter in the conundrum?
Anyone taking statistics???
User avatar
Mark Deeks
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Mark Deeks »

Hello Charlotte.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Peter Mabey »

MONTANE to beat OMENTA
User avatar
Andy Platt
Kiloposter
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: Wirral

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Andy Platt »

I only caught the last 2 rounds.

If anyone was wondering I just checked with someone with an ODE3, and BITTEREST should (at least as far as I can see, feel free to have a mass debate) not be valid as it is a two syllable adjective and can't take -EST on the end without it being specified in the dictionary, which it isn't.

Disappointing decision from the staff, usually any time anything is a bit ambiguous they just abandon it and play it safe.
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Jordan F »

First of all, I realize no it's not series 66. I'll fix it when I get home.

Second, to Andy's point, regardless of the situation, neither player could solve it, so I feel as if Liam's win was still fair. If Charlotte had solved it, I could see an issue, but not in this instance.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by James Robinson »

Andy Platt wrote:I only caught the last 2 rounds.

If anyone was wondering I just checked with someone with an ODE3, and BITTEREST should (at least as far as I can see, feel free to have a mass debate) not be valid as it is a two syllable adjective and can't take -EST on the end without it being specified in the dictionary, which it isn't.

Disappointing decision from the staff, usually any time anything is a bit ambiguous they just abandon it and play it safe.
Having just double-checked my own sources, you are definitely correct, BITTEREST is not in, so there's definitely some controversy, although you could say that Charlotte missed an even better chance, by not sticking the S onto TAPPING in round 9, which would've given her the win by 1 point. :oops:

CAVORTS/OSTRACA in round 1, RUDIMENT in round 3, FOOTLES in round 4 and GAPPIEST/GENIPAPS in round 9.

2nd Numbers Alt.: (((25 + 50) x 6) + 5) x 2 = 910
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by JimBentley »

James Robinson wrote:Having just double-checked my own sources, you are definitely correct, BITTEREST is not in
I reckon the comparatives and superlatives of a lot of these two syllable adjectives aren't in the dictionary simply because they got overlooked.
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by John Garcia »

No one interested in the upside-down S?
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Jordan F »

John Garcia wrote:No one interested in the upside-down S?
Eh...not me to be honest. It's a fun anomaly for the history books, but as long as I can clearly tell what letter it is, I'm not losing sleep over it.
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Mike Brown »

JimBentley wrote:I reckon the comparatives and superlatives of a lot of these two syllable adjectives aren't in the dictionary simply because they got overlooked.
Agreed, it always annoys me that the likes of UNKINDEST and SHALLOWER aren't in.
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Kiloposter
Posts: 1648
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Mike Brown wrote:
JimBentley wrote:I reckon the comparatives and superlatives of a lot of these two syllable adjectives aren't in the dictionary simply because they got overlooked.
Agreed, it always annoys me that the likes of UNKINDEST and SHALLOWER aren't in.
UNKINDEST was used in Series 48. :geek:
http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_3284
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Mike Brown »

Johnny Canuck wrote:UNKINDEST was used in Series 48. :geek:
http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_3284
Good spot. Think you might have unearthed another 'illegal' conundrum. :)
User avatar
Clive Brooker
Devotee
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
Location: San Toy

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by Clive Brooker »

Mike Brown wrote:
JimBentley wrote:I reckon the comparatives and superlatives of a lot of these two syllable adjectives aren't in the dictionary simply because they got overlooked.
Agreed, it always annoys me that the likes of UNKINDEST and SHALLOWER aren't in.
Both of those would have been OK under the COD7, assuming that the inflexion section was followed for all such matters when the COD7 was in use. But then I suppose that interpretation would also have allowed something as ghastly as LOWBROWER.

It would never have occurred to me not to offer BITTEREST in a game of Countdown, but BITTERER to me sounds very odd, so maybe the dictionary has a point.
David Williams
Kiloposter
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 19 2012 (Series 66 #33)

Post by David Williams »

Clive Brooker wrote:It would never have occurred to me not to offer BITTEREST in a game of Countdown, but BITTERER to me sounds very odd, so maybe the dictionary has a point.
I know of at least one parallel. MINUTEST is specified, MINUTER is not.
Post Reply