Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 25)
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 25)
It really has been Ladies Week on Countdown, with Nick and Aliraza being the only males in front of the camera this week so far. And appropriately, a woman has won all 4 games, and without meaning to rhyme, her name is Victoria James. She's had some good wins and some not so good wins, but if she wins one more game, she may be the number 2 seed even with a loss on Monday. Can she do it? It's the last day of Kate Humble in dictionary corner, and I'm glad to see her go just because of my internal struggle of whether I liked her or not. Hopefully with the next guest it's clear cut whether I like this person or not, but we shall see.
Join Thomas for the recap later.
Join Thomas for the recap later.
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
That doesn't rhyme.Jordan F wrote:without meaning to rhyme, her name is Victoria James.
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
But if Nick's been pronouncing her name wrong the entire time? What if the s is silent and "Jame" sounds exactly like "rhyme?" I've thought of these things Ryan, I've thought them out deeply.Ryan Taylor wrote:That doesn't rhyme.Jordan F wrote:without meaning to rhyme, her name is Victoria James.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:26 am
- Location: Kent
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
According to the audience ticket schedule it should be Gloria Hunniford next week and Anne Widdecome after that, whereupon I think you'll conclude that Kate Humble is not so bad after all. Hunniford in particular falls into that smug self-satisfied group that was so prominent in RW's days (think Sheridan Morley, Brandreth, Martin Jarvis et al). IMHO of course....Jordan F wrote:It really has been Ladies Week on Countdown, with Nick and Aliraza being the only males in front of the camera this week so far. And appropriately, a woman has won all 4 games, and without meaning to rhyme, her name is Victoria James. She's had some good wins and some not so good wins, but if she wins one more game, she may be the number 2 seed even with a loss on Monday. Can she do it? It's the last day of Kate Humble in dictionary corner, and I'm glad to see her go just because of my internal struggle of whether I liked her or not. Hopefully with the next guest it's clear cut whether I like this person or not, but we shall see.
Join Thomas for the recap later.
Edit: although just to be fair I should add that she has had to deal very publicly with the death of her daughter (Caron Keating), every parent's nightmare, and has subsequently raised a lot of money for people who have to care for cancer patients.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
"Many a mickle makes a muckle". If you look this up, you'll discover that it's nonsense. I expected far better of Susie than this.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
I thought Dave was a bit unlucky there today. Victoria definitely looked a bit off today and was definitely grateful for that horrible last numbers round.
CANOPIES in round 2 (although I'm still mortified by finally knowing what CAPONISE means now ), TROPHIES in round 3, INJURE in round 6, TRIGONAL in round 7 and TUTORED in round 11.
2nd Numbers Alt.: ((75 + 5) x 2) + (9 x 3) = 187
Anyone else noticed that the first 2 numbers games had the exact same numbers come up in the exact same order
CANOPIES in round 2 (although I'm still mortified by finally knowing what CAPONISE means now ), TROPHIES in round 3, INJURE in round 6, TRIGONAL in round 7 and TUTORED in round 11.
2nd Numbers Alt.: ((75 + 5) x 2) + (9 x 3) = 187
Anyone else noticed that the first 2 numbers games had the exact same numbers come up in the exact same order
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
Uh oh.Keith Bennett wrote:According to the audience ticket schedule it should be Gloria Hunniford next week and Anne Widdecome after that
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
3rd numbers: ((25x5x3)+7)x2+5 = 769
Victoria might not have been quite as good today as she was recently (maybe because of tiredness) but the lightning quick conundrum solve was pretty impressive.
Victoria might not have been quite as good today as she was recently (maybe because of tiredness) but the lightning quick conundrum solve was pretty impressive.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
Yeah might have been a late one. She's definitely faded last 2 episodes, she was really quite sharp on WednesdayJack Worsley wrote: Victoria might not have been quite as good today as she was recently (maybe because of tiredness).
No! That's crazy. I'm usually all over stuff like this.James Robinson wrote:Anyone else noticed that the first 2 numbers games had the exact same numbers come up in the exact same order
Maybe with the human factor they were just shuffled really badly.
Edit: Jack, if she goes far there's a good chance you could play her in finals. Looking forward to 30 points in the numbers?
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
If she gets to the finals, she might want to work on her numbers a bit. I'd definitely fancy my chances of getting a few points off her on the numbers, might even ditch four large as I'd probably have a decent enough chance of winning on the numbers rounds anyway. If her numbers were anywhere near as good as her letters rounds and conundrums, she could easily have got a couple of centuries by now.Andy Platt wrote:Jack Worsley wrote:
Edit: Jack, if she goes far there's a good chance you could play her in finals. Looking forward to 30 points in the numbers?
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
Does anyone remember this game? Perilously close to the hat-trick.James Robinson wrote:Anyone else noticed that the first 2 numbers games had the exact same numbers come up in the exact same order
This was one of Rachel's first games and IIRC she was tending to pick the same pattern from the board each time. That certainly wasn't the reason this time.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2038
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
Probability of two fair, random, one-large games having the same selection in the same order: (1/4) * (2/20) * (2/19) * (2/18) * (2/17) * (2/16) = 32/7441920 = 1/232560. That assumes all the numbers picked are different, though. For selections where you get two of the same number I think the probability is slightly lower.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2038
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
It was impressive, but after the conundrum was revealed Nick did faff about for a bit before starting the clock.Jack Worsley wrote:3rd numbers: ((25x5x3)+7)x2+5 = 769
Victoria might not have been quite as good today as she was recently (maybe because of tiredness) but the lightning quick conundrum solve was pretty impressive.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:58 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
Confirm it's Gloria H. next week, recorded January 18, I was there for the final 3 of the week in the p.m.. Smug? Maybe, and I have mixed feelings about her, but she usually has some good banter with Dudley in front of the audience beforehand.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
I often get these wrong, but if you assume all the numbers are different, isn't it (1/4) * (1/10) * (1/9) * (1/8) * (1/7) * (1/6) = 1/120960?Graeme Cole wrote:Probability of two fair, random, one-large games having the same selection in the same order: (1/4) * (2/20) * (2/19) * (2/18) * (2/17) * (2/16) = 32/7441920 = 1/232560. That assumes all the numbers picked are different, though. For selections where you get two of the same number I think the probability is slightly lower.
And the chances of all the numbers being different is 1 - ((18/19) * (16/18) * (14/17) * (12/16)) = 48%.
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
If you get to the finals as well. I was in a similar position and I wasn't comfortable until my name went bold on the wiki standings.Jack Worsley wrote:If she gets to the finals, she might want to work on her numbers a bit. I'd definitely fancy my chances of getting a few points off her on the numbers, might even ditch four large as I'd probably have a decent enough chance of winning on the numbers rounds anyway. If her numbers were anywhere near as good as her letters rounds and conundrums, she could easily have got a couple of centuries by now.Andy Platt wrote:Jack Worsley wrote:
Edit: Jack, if she goes far there's a good chance you could play her in finals. Looking forward to 30 points in the numbers?
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2038
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
If the selection in one round is, say, 75 7 2 5 3 9, then in the next numbers round, the probability of picking a 75 is 1/4, then the probability of picking a 7 next is 2/20 (because there are two sevens out of 20 smalls), then the probability of picking a two next is 2/19 (there are two twos out of 19 smalls left), and so on.David Williams wrote:I often get these wrong, but if you assume all the numbers are different, isn't it (1/4) * (1/10) * (1/9) * (1/8) * (1/7) * (1/6) = 1/120960?Graeme Cole wrote:Probability of two fair, random, one-large games having the same selection in the same order: (1/4) * (2/20) * (2/19) * (2/18) * (2/17) * (2/16) = 32/7441920 = 1/232560. That assumes all the numbers picked are different, though. For selections where you get two of the same number I think the probability is slightly lower.
And the chances of all the numbers being different is 1 - ((18/19) * (16/18) * (14/17) * (12/16)) = 48%.
Of course, if the selection was 75 7 7 5 5 9, then the probability of getting the same selection in the same order next time would be something like 1/4 * 2/20 * 1/19 * 2/18 * 1/17 * 2/16, so it doesn't work if there are repetitions.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday February 10th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim
Yes, always a mistake to try to think clearly after midnight. I could see how you'd arrived at your answer, but decided that on the third pick there were only 18 smalls available, because one of them was the other 7, invalidating your assumption. But that's nonsense!Graeme Cole wrote:If the selection in one round is, say, 75 7 2 5 3 9, then in the next numbers round, the probability of picking a 75 is 1/4, then the probability of picking a 7 next is 2/20 (because there are two sevens out of 20 smalls), then the probability of picking a two next is 2/19 (there are two twos out of 19 smalls left), and so on.