Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Conor »

Congrats Dave :) Very impressive today. 880 is a very good score.
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Craig Beevers »

Yea 880 not bad, 11 more would have ideal really.

Think there was NOONERS in one of the rounds, not sure of such words these days tho.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

I disagree. You should've been better, particularly on the numbers and letters. Oh, and you were a bit slow on the conundrum.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Jon Corby »

I also thought he was shit. He missed several easy nines, plus he only got that conundrum today because his opponent virtually told him what it was.

While 880 is a fairly good score, it will surely haunt David that he could have got much higher just by being a bit better. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't actually see him at the finals, people have ended it all over far smaller disappointments than this.


Only joking, congratulations mate.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

Yes, well done mate. Your long-awaited entry onto the Octochamp Stats page will be made as soon as today's recap appears.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Paul Howe »

Heh, congratulations David. Only managed to see one of your shows but couldn't resist poking my nose in here to see how you'd done, and have to say that 880 is a ridiculously impressive score.

Congrats once more.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

NOONERS certainly is valid and means a lunchtime drink or a euphemism for lunchtime nookie. I had it but thought I was imagining it. Didn't risk untaken because un- words are bad. Definitely should have seen LATTICES. You are all right, I am ridiculously bad ... I don't know why I thought I could play this game in the first place ... GOODBYE CRUEL WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Joseph Bolas »

I missed your last few games but congratulations on becoming octochamp.
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by JimBentley »

Charlie Reams wrote:...Your long-awaited entry onto the Octochamp Stats page will be made as soon as today's recap appears.
Speaking of which, today's is going to be a bit later than usual, I'm afraid. Probably about eight o'clock-ish, if that's OK?

Brilliant stuff though, David! Tomorrow's contestants must be breathing a sigh of relief at having dodged the bullet! :)
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

Sorry Jim, that's totally unacceptable. I've drafted Amey Deshpande to replace you.
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Howard Somerset »

Congrats, David. I've nearly seen all of your shows - expect to have seen them all by tomorrow - and have been impressed with everything. Hope you're enjoying the break before the finals.
User avatar
Ben Pugh
Enthusiast
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: North London

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Ben Pugh »

Corby wrote:I also thought he was shit. He missed several easy nines, plus he only got that conundrum today because his opponent virtually told him what it was.

While 880 is a fairly good score, it will surely haunt David that he could have got much higher just by being a bit better. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't actually see him at the finals, people have ended it all over far smaller disappointments than this.
Agreed. Today I beat David 149 - 3, having given him 3 sympathy points after the second section.

Aside from that, 880 is an amazing achievement, well done.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

Charlie Reams wrote:Yes, well done mate. Your long-awaited entry onto the Octochamp Stats page will be made as soon as today's recap appears.
Ahem, LIAR!
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

I'm not crediting you as an octochamp until I find out whether our armchair heroes did better than you.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

LMAO. Craig's dig really got to you didn't it?? You're not an armchair hero; I think it would be good if you did well in one of the next couple of series that entitles you to a shot at Craig in a C of C: he may discover that you are not to be under-estimated regardless of where you happen to be seated.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

Urp, I'm sure that phrase wasn't used in reference to me, but I do think it's a good one. I'll be out of my armchair this summer I think, depending on how my attempts to wise-up on the numbers go.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

Yes, I don't think he meant you but it'd be great to see you up next ... just not in this series :x
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Julian Fell »

Seriously, fantastic stuff David - I hope Conor was being tongue-in-cheek when he described 880 as "very good". I think Damian once said he didn't think 875 (by Chris Wills) would ever be beaten!

I think you're also the first-ever octochamp to score 110 or more in six different games of his octochamp run - is that right people?

So what was all that "I'm not a top player" stuff about? I don't know, what are you like :) You'll almost certainly be no.1 seed for the finals and it's all about how you cope with the pressure... but I'm sure you will. You say you were most nervous for your first game, well IMHO that was probably your best performance (not that the others were bad)... so watch out, other series 58-ers!
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Julian Fell »

David O'Donnell wrote:Yes, I don't think he meant you but it'd be great to see you up next ... just not in this series :x
Yes I'm really looking forward to seeing you on TV Charlie - though don't be rushed into it; I don't need to tell you that you only get one shot, and that you should wait till you're as good as you think you'll ever be, before taking the plunge.

Is there any chance at all that you could use your nickname when you go on the programme? I just think it would be legendary for a series of Countdown to be won by a man called Soo! :D
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

Actually, Julian's advice is spot on: you should wait until you feel you are ready. I should have waited longer but I just couldn't; besides I am not getting any younger.

PS Life ain't easy for a boy named ... Soo.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Conor »

Julian wrote:Seriously, fantastic stuff David - I hope Conor was being tongue-in-cheek when he described 880 as "very good". I think Damian once said he didn't think 875 (by Chris Wills) would ever be beaten!
Err, not really. :?
I think you're also the first-ever octochamp to score 110 or more in six different games of his octochamp run - is that right people?
I did that too. 2 scores in the nineties (99 and 99), and 6 scores in the one-hundred and tens.[/quote]
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

Right Mr O'D, I know you'll have been refreshing the page every couple of seconds until I updated it, so to put you out of your misery I've added you to the Hall of Greats. 4th on points, 2nd on percentage, and 2nd on winning margin - a performance that can only be described as "nang", and I don't use that word lightly. Fantastic stuff mate, you've exceeded my already high expectations when it really mattered. Can't wait for the finals (which are also during my Finals, unamusingly.) And to summarise, awesome.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4545
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Yeah well done mate. Maybe next you'll beat me online?

Probably not.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

Remind me: what happened in our last game? I can't really remember the result but I do remember that you were over my knee and I appeared to be spanking you with a great deal of force.
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Julian Fell »

Conor wrote: I did that too. 2 scores in the nineties (99 and 99), and 6 scores in the one-hundred and tens.
Ah fair enough, my mistake. It's still v rare though, so well done David.

Conor you would describe 880 as just "very good"? I'd describe it as fantastic, myself...
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Well played David. INFRARED was particularly impressive today. I did pull ahead with NOONERS (I remembered it was a North American term) but then you hit back with INFRARED. I went into the conundrum 100-101 to you and you beat me to the conundrum. Quality stuff. Good job I wasn't sat in the challenger's chair!!!
Michael Macdonald-Cooper
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:59 am

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Michael Macdonald-Cooper »

May I add my congratulations to David for a terrific performance!
Martin Smith
Acolyte
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:12 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Martin Smith »

Well done David, I knew you'd do it. I feel good about only losing 92-62 to you
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Spoilers for 4th February 2008

Post by Julian Fell »

So you should Martin - you were pretty much his closest challenger!
Post Reply