Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by James Robinson »

Into the midweek we arrive, and following on from yesterday's gut-wrenching finish, Andy just about remains in the champions' chair. But can he survive the next onslaught :?:

I'll be around later with the Robinson Recap. ;) :) :D :mrgreen: 8-)
User avatar
Adam Gillard
Kiloposter
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Adam Gillard »

Every Wednesday I half expect another aptoctochamp to be waiting in the wings, but there can't be that many to have one on every week, surely?...
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by James Robinson »

Adam Gillard wrote:Every Wednesday I half expect another aptoctochamp to be waiting in the wings, but there can't be that many to have one on every week, surely?...
Not impossible, but they would probably have to spread out nicely, or in other words, start their run on a Thursday or Friday, then they'd be on 3 separate weeks. :idea:

EDIT: We have already failed for this series, as we had no octochamp 3 weeks ago. :geek:
Dan McColm
Series 71 Champion
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:23 am

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Dan McColm »

Call it a hunch, but I think there'll be an apterite on tomorrow
User avatar
Joseph Krol
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:47 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Joseph Krol »

NOYADES in the EXPANDS round
Image
Stewart Gordon
Enthusiast
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Stewart Gordon »

Have enough chess players BISHOPED their pawns for this word to be in there?
User avatar
Adam Gillard
Kiloposter
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Adam Gillard »

Dan McColm wrote:Call it a hunch, but I think there'll be an apterite on tomorrow
Is it Dale Levell? :?
User avatar
Adam Gillard
Kiloposter
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Adam Gillard »

RURALIST in the RITUALS round
User avatar
Tony Atkins
Fanatic
Posts: 2237
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Tony Atkins »

Adam Gillard wrote:RURALIST in the RITUALS round
The other DC beater was MOMENTA, with equallers OUTMAN and MANQUE,
in R8 where Ms Dent said AMOUNT was the only 6.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by James Robinson »

Also DYSPNOEA in round 4 and OMENTUM in round 8.
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2038
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Graeme Cole »

Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Mike Brown »

Graeme Cole wrote:Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
Yes, but there was no shouting from me, just an inward "oh no, not again"!
Stewart Gordon
Enthusiast
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Stewart Gordon »

Graeme Cole wrote:Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
Indeed, it got me thinking along the lines of "a telescope that sees into the future?"
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13275
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Where did you find this out?
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

On the internet.
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13275
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Rhys Benjamin wrote:On the internet.
I found nothing.
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:On the internet.
I found nothing.
That's because the video was taken off YouTube.
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Ian Volante »

Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13275
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by JimBentley »

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
:x
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.
And why would a shampoo advert use the audio from a Formula 1 crash in which someone dies? Who could possibly think that was a good idea (given that any production company making such an advert would have access to pretty much an unlimited amount of stock sound effects)? It all sounds very unlikely to me.
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

JimBentley wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.
And why would a shampoo advert use the audio from a Formula 1 crash in which someone dies? Who could possibly think that was a good idea (given that any production company making such an advert would have access to pretty much an unlimited amount of stock sound effects)? It all sounds very unlikely to me.
I would link to it, but I can't.
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
Mark James
Kiloposter
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Mark James »

Rhys Benjamin wrote:I would link to it, but I can't.
Can you at least link us to the shampoo advert so we can hear what you're on about. I doubt I'll care either way though.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13275
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Gavin Chipper »

I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Ian Volante »

I really doubt they'd pick a random race from 1994 when there'd be much better quality from more recently, plus shampoo can't drive, what?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Charlie Reams »

Rhys Benjamin wrote: I would link to it, but I can't.
Well, you've certainly convinced me!
Mark James
Kiloposter
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Mark James »

Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Ian Volante »

Mark James wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

Ian Volante wrote:
Mark James wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.
The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Ian Volante »

Rhys Benjamin wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Mark James wrote: Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.
The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
Liam Tiernan
Devotee
Posts: 799
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Liam Tiernan »

Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote: The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?
I've always suspected there was something odd about Rhys.
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

Liam Tiernan wrote:
Ian Volante wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote: The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?
I've always suspected there was something odd about Rhys.
Monty Burns must be under 13 then.
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
Post Reply