Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Into the midweek we arrive, and following on from yesterday's gut-wrenching finish, Andy just about remains in the champions' chair. But can he survive the next onslaught
I'll be around later with the Robinson Recap.
I'll be around later with the Robinson Recap.
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Every Wednesday I half expect another aptoctochamp to be waiting in the wings, but there can't be that many to have one on every week, surely?...
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Not impossible, but they would probably have to spread out nicely, or in other words, start their run on a Thursday or Friday, then they'd be on 3 separate weeks.Adam Gillard wrote:Every Wednesday I half expect another aptoctochamp to be waiting in the wings, but there can't be that many to have one on every week, surely?...
EDIT: We have already failed for this series, as we had no octochamp 3 weeks ago.
-
- Series 71 Champion
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:23 am
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Call it a hunch, but I think there'll be an apterite on tomorrow
- Joseph Krol
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:47 pm
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Have enough chess players BISHOPED their pawns for this word to be in there?
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Is it Dale Levell?Dan McColm wrote:Call it a hunch, but I think there'll be an apterite on tomorrow
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
RURALIST in the RITUALS round
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
The other DC beater was MOMENTA, with equallers OUTMAN and MANQUE,Adam Gillard wrote:RURALIST in the RITUALS round
in R8 where Ms Dent said AMOUNT was the only 6.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Also DYSPNOEA in round 4 and OMENTUM in round 8.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2038
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Yes, but there was no shouting from me, just an inward "oh no, not again"!Graeme Cole wrote:Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Indeed, it got me thinking along the lines of "a telescope that sees into the future?"Graeme Cole wrote:Did anyone else notice Jeff made the all-too-common error of saying "astrological" instead of "astronomical" during his opening anecdote? And shout things at the screen as a result?
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Where did you find this out?Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
On the internet.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I found nothing.Rhys Benjamin wrote:On the internet.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
That's because the video was taken off YouTube.Gavin Chipper wrote:I found nothing.Rhys Benjamin wrote:On the internet.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.Ian Volante wrote:Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
And why would a shampoo advert use the audio from a Formula 1 crash in which someone dies? Who could possibly think that was a good idea (given that any production company making such an advert would have access to pretty much an unlimited amount of stock sound effects)? It all sounds very unlikely to me.Gavin Chipper wrote:It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.Ian Volante wrote:Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?Rhys Benjamin wrote:I was disgusted by the shampoo advert. Not that it's for shampoo, but the sound effects were from Formula One's blackest day - Senna's death. A quick glance at the internet found that they were technically the same sound.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I would link to it, but I can't.JimBentley wrote:And why would a shampoo advert use the audio from a Formula 1 crash in which someone dies? Who could possibly think that was a good idea (given that any production company making such an advert would have access to pretty much an unlimited amount of stock sound effects)? It all sounds very unlikely to me.Gavin Chipper wrote:It sounds unlikely. The only "evidence" is apparently some video that was taken down from YouTube.Ian Volante wrote:Technically? You mean they sampled the engine noise and the crunch or something?
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: Dublin
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Can you at least link us to the shampoo advert so we can hear what you're on about. I doubt I'll care either way though.Rhys Benjamin wrote:I would link to it, but I can't.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13275
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I really doubt they'd pick a random race from 1994 when there'd be much better quality from more recently, plus shampoo can't drive, what?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Well, you've certainly convinced me!Rhys Benjamin wrote: I would link to it, but I can't.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: Dublin
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I bet Ecclestone's a tory.Mark James wrote:Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!Ian Volante wrote:I bet Ecclestone's a tory.Mark James wrote:Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.Gavin Chipper wrote:I think it's this. There's no crash sound. I think Rhys might just mean the racing noises were from the same race. But even if the "proof" video no longer exists, you could at least tell us the way in which the video enlightened you to this fact.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3965
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
You do know he's older than Monty Burns?Rhys Benjamin wrote:The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!Ian Volante wrote:I bet Ecclestone's a tory.Mark James wrote: Cheers Gavin. Sounds like standard stock noises to me. How is one supposed to differentiate between the sounds of one formula 1 race from another anyway? They all sound exactly the same. Not to mention that they all look pretty much the same too. What a rubbish sport.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
I've always suspected there was something odd about Rhys.Ian Volante wrote:You do know he's older than Monty Burns?Rhys Benjamin wrote: The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 16th 2011
Monty Burns must be under 13 then.Liam Tiernan wrote:I've always suspected there was something odd about Rhys.Ian Volante wrote:You do know he's older than Monty Burns?Rhys Benjamin wrote: The Tories were a completely different party in the 1880's! The Conservatives and the Tories were 2 different parties¬!