Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon Corby »

Post them all here!

There's bound to be loads, because David is rubbish.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4545
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon O'Neill »

I'm going for the Dagenham bird. Sorry Dave-o.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Michael Wallace »

round 2, DC mention OUTRACED but not OUTRAGED - Carol did put the G below the C though when she put it up ;)
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4545
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon O'Neill »

994 (two away)

((75+50)/25*100-3)*2
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Craig Beevers »

I got 994 going this way (this tends to be one of the first routes I try):

25*50 = 1250

2*(75+3) = 156 + 100 = 256

1250 - 256 = 994
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4545
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon O'Neill »

PROTEASE is a nice 8.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Conor »

TOXOID was there as an equaller a few rounds ago.
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Joseph Bolas »

Ginger Jono wrote:PROTEASE is a nice 8.
SEPARATE too in the same round I believe.
User avatar
Ben Pugh
Enthusiast
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: North London

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Ben Pugh »

DOGMATISE.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Conor »

DOGMATISE.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Michael Wallace »

wow, lowest score ever in 15 rounds, right? also, was it just me or was the countdown revealed suddenly in a cut? I looked up at the screen and it seemed to be visible before he started the clock

that said, I didn't sleep last night...
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4545
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon O'Neill »

No, you're right, a little bit of a fuckup. Probably didn't happen like that in the studio though.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Conor »

I noticed the same thing Michael, it was there for quite a while before the clock started. Although considering there didn't seem to be a turning of the board and it's unlikely the conundrum operator was that far off in timing it was probably just an editing error.

What was the final score by the way?
User avatar
Ben Pugh
Enthusiast
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: North London

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Ben Pugh »

Lowest score ever? 111 - 13 final score.

Des and Richard Digance didn't half enjoy sticking the boot in.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Michael Wallace »

maybe they should raise the threshold for the 'teapot if you score zero' to something that's positive now we have these 15 round games? :P
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

Awesome. I love to see records get broken, and especially by such a great bloke as DO'D. I hope she joins the forum.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Kirk Bevins »

No offence to the lady (who seemed lovely) but how did she miss so much? Now I know it's much harder up there than at home (as I'm a bottling git) but to get 4s out of meaty selections and miss 191 when 100x2 - 9 was there and miss 810 when she had 807 and a 75/25 was left was unbelievable. She passed the audition didn't she. Amazing viewing. Daniel looked almost apologetic when declaring 8s over her 4s and 5s. I'll admit to being beaten today missing BABIES and CENTAVO (even though I knew this word and have spotted it numerous times before including in Scrabulous on facebook). I did manage to beat you yesterday though on a crucial conundrum - only just (I missed CONVICTS and FACTURE). I was quite pleased with METHANOL and HEARKEN, which I learnt literally 2 days ago.

Kirk
User avatar
Harry Whitehouse
Rookie
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: Scarborough
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Harry Whitehouse »

After the first three rounds, I decided it must be David's Mum putting on a Wolverhampton accent. Were the tattoos authentic, or were they part of the disguise?
My home is on the south side,
High up on a ridge,
Just a half a mile from
The Scarborough Valley bridge.
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

A few issues came up there. Firstly, the conundrum was a retake because I made a balls up. I buzzed in and said "CLOCKWISE" and then said "no, it isn't I have messed it up." The music then started and Des got a message in the earpiece to tell me I was right after all. When I said "is it CLOCKWISE?" I had had to keep an eye on the studio manager who was to give me a cue at about ten seconds. My opponent, who was indeed an absolutely lovely lady, thought it would have been rather funny had she buzzed in on the retake: I concur! Secondly, there was a second retake when I had REALISED. Richard, who was really funny, said there was an anagram and I said "Oh yeah, SIDEREAL." Unfortunately, I pronounced it side ---- real which meant a retake and hence Richard saying "no-one else got it" with the studio laugh being edited out.

It was the first game on a new day and unfortunately I had got rather tanked the night before with a few of the other contestants so I was hanging by a thread during this game. DOGMATISE was mentioned by another contestant. He, very generously, suggested that I had it and didn't risk it but had I have seen it I would have gone for it. Another nine missed: Corby's right, I suck. Hazel felt she should have had a crack and that's good enough for me. She wanted to get on TV after having been on 'The Weakest Link' and umm err getting voted off first. I apologised profusely after the game explaining that I may need the points and she was a really great sport about it.

994 was an awesome spot Jono, I was nowhere near it.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Conor »

David O'Donnell wrote:A few issues came up there. Firstly, the conundrum was a retake because I made a balls up. I buzzed in and said "CLOCKWISE" and then said "no, it isn't I have messed it up." The music then started and Des got a message in the earpiece to tell me I was right after all. When I said "is it CLOCKWISE?" I had had to keep an eye on the studio manager who was to give me a cue at about ten seconds.
So that's why you had a grin on your face. And I was thinking it was because you'd seen COCK from those letters...
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Julian Fell »

Charlie Reams wrote:Awesome. I love to see records get broken, and especially by such a great bloke as DO'D.
Yes, especially when that record has stood for nearly 5 years (since 19 February 2003). I reckon it could be much longer than that till 13 gets beaten...

Today was also the second-highest winning margin ever I believe. Interesting, this series is only 21 episodes old and we've already had winning margins of 82, 97 and 98... it seems to be the season for thrashings! (sorry Stewart S, if you're there!)

Well done David, as ever - great performance, though it is difficult when your opponent is "not at the races" to that extent... you do become the villain of the piece a bit as you outscore them time and time again. When you leaned across to Hazel after she declared WIELDS, were you telling her she could have had WIELDERS? :)

Re Craig's post, I want to go and lie down in a darkened room (I was pleased with myself for getting 997 on that round) - so, so glad I don't have to face you in CofC. I did expect that Jono would have the closest possible though, and he didn't let me down!

And no, David, you don't suck. Although, from your comments, one thing I have noticed is that you do seem to have a lot of opponents who are very good at spotting brilliant words (including DC-beaters) when in the audience, but suddenly dry up when they're actually in the chair facing you. Maybe it's that amazing hypnotic power you have :)
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Martin Gardner »

I know sometimes given the difficulty of the audition it sometimes surprises people that some contestants are so bad. And the problem with comparing Octochamps scores likes 890, 875, 871 and stuff is that I think a lot of Octochamps just beat up on 8 weak players, and the victory is never in doubt it's just the size of the victory. I was incredibly surprised to win eight games as at home I'd say I won "more than half" the games so it was a bit of a shock to win 8 in a row without a crucial conundrum. I always say (although I haven't said it for a while so bear with me) that the only thing I regret about going on Countdown is that I didn't wait a year or more to do it. But still I suppose the end result really couldn't have been any better than what it was. Still I don't want to go on the French version until I've finished my degree.

What I'm saying is that effectively someone has to have the lowest score. If she hadn't scored 13 then it would still be Judy Smedley with 18, and if it wasn't here it would be (I think) Julie Cocker with 24, so it always has to be someone.

Martin
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Martin Gardner wrote:
What I'm saying is that effectively someone has to have the lowest score. If she hadn't scored 13 then it would still be Judy Smedley with 18, and if it wasn't here it would be (I think) Julie Cocker with 24, so it always has to be someone.

Martin
Does this win the prize for the most obvious statement - ever?
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Joseph Bolas »

Kirk Bevins wrote:No offence to the lady (who seemed lovely) but how did she miss so much? Now I know it's much harder up there than at home (as I'm a bottling git) but to get 4s out of meaty selections and miss 191 when 100x2 - 9 was there and miss 810 when she had 807 and a 75/25 was left was unbelievable.

Kirk
Maybe the contestant was trying to add 91 to the 100 instead of going up to 200 then coming down to 191.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon Corby »

David O'Donnell wrote:Another nine missed: Corby's right, I suck.
:lol: That was meant to be your cue to mention the raping you gave me in our online game last night. Damn your modesty, you've made me look bad in all kinds of ways there. ;)

Awesome game again today mate, but I reckon you must feel kinda embarrassed when you're thrashing somebody as badly (well?) as that. I remember Paul Howe being particularly uncomfortable about his QF with Keith Maynard, but what can you do?

Also Julian's suggestion that you leant over to tell Hazel she could have had WIELDERS made me lol!
(You didn't, right?!)
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Charlie Reams »

Looks like this page might need an update...
James Hurrell
Acolyte
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:14 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by James Hurrell »

Well done again - you headed me by 1 going into the conundrum. I didn't see CENTAVO (never heard of it) but I had POTATO. Got the conundrum before you to win 105-96, but I did have a couple more seconds than you had with the editing error!! That makes it 3-2 to you I think. Oh, and I did exactly the same in that I had REALISED and then thought it has an anagram SIDEREAL and pronounced it just like you!! It was interesting to hear the proper pronunciation! That's what happens when you learn words with no idea of their meaning/usage!

Looking forward to game 6.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Conor »

Being from Ireland, I'm surprised you didn't see potato... (I'm sorry, I couldn't resist :P )
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

Conor wrote:Being from Ireland, I'm surprised you didn't see potato... (I'm sorry, I couldn't resist :P )

There was a few of us watching this game and I gave them a hint that there was a word an Irish person should get: no-one got it and it was so bloody simple. Ah well, I was starting to tune out during this game. At a quiz last night the quiz-master said "Hazel was a tough nut to crack" --- cue groan ---
User avatar
Ben Pugh
Enthusiast
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: North London

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Ben Pugh »

Corby wrote:Also Julian's suggestion that you leant over to tell Hazel she could have had WIELDERS made me lol!
(You didn't, right?!)
That's what I thought as well, looking at her reaction.
User avatar
Matthew Green
Devotee
Posts: 716
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Matthew Green »

Kirk Bevins wrote:Daniel looked almost apologetic when declaring 8s over her 4s and 5s.
Kirk
Was that a little joke or a Freudian slip from a closet Daniel O'Donnell fan?
David O'Donnell
Series 58 Champion
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by David O'Donnell »

I am afraid I did lean over to tell Hazel about adding the -er :oops: Does that officially make me a git? In today's game I gave CABINETS as opposed to BASCINET once I heard his word.In my defence though he did say to me "hey Paddy, what's your name?" So his card was marked after that!! :twisted:
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Jon Corby »

David O'Donnell wrote:I am afraid I did lean over to tell Hazel about adding the -er :oops: Does that officially make me a git? In today's game I gave CABINETS as opposed to BASCINET once I heard his word.In my defence though he did say to me "hey Paddy, what's your name?" So his card was marked after that!! :twisted:
:lol: All modest to the camera, snidey on the side. Love it! :lol:
User avatar
Matthew Green
Devotee
Posts: 716
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 30th January 2008

Post by Matthew Green »

I did feel a teeny bit sorry for her but, given the selection, DIME is one of the most appalling words Ive ever seen on the show.
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum
Post Reply