Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Moderator: James Robinson
- Philip Jarvis
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
It's Kirk v Neil today in the 1st semi final. Get your sun cream on folks ........... this is going to be a hot one!!
The usual daily verse will be posted after screening because it contains spoilers.
The usual daily verse will be posted after screening because it contains spoilers.
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6281
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Could there be an upset in the making?
Or will it be 10 in a row for the Kirkulator
Or will it be 10 in a row for the Kirkulator
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
250% on the Reams index.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Can't wait to watch this bad boy.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st S
I'm so excited i've parodied the chorus to Belinda Carlisles hit 'Heaven is a place on earth' cos heaven rhymes with Bevins and earth rhymes with Kirk!
He likes to play darts while he quenches his thirst
His last name's Bevins and his first name's Kirk
If it's a crucial conundrum, he's bound to buzz first
His last name's Bevins and his first name's Kirk
He likes to play darts while he quenches his thirst
His last name's Bevins and his first name's Kirk
If it's a crucial conundrum, he's bound to buzz first
His last name's Bevins and his first name's Kirk
- James Doohan
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st S
Wish it was 3.25 already
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Hoping to catch this one live, having been out for the afternoon on the last two days. Can't wait.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Considering most of the people getting excited in this thread already know what happens, this makes the whole thing rather fucking exciting indeed.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
I think it would not be overstating the case to say that this one is the game of this series' finals.Matt Morrison wrote:Considering most of the people getting excited in this thread already know what happens, this makes the whole thing rather fucking exciting indeed.
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Am I the only one that thinks Kirk will piss this? Not to denigrate Neil who is a fantastic player, but Kirk is on another level to practically everyone ...
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
How about giving us a prediction for the final score line then?Jon Corby wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Kirk will piss this? Not to denigrate Neil who is a fantastic player, but Kirk is on another level to practically everyone ...
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6281
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
hope it goes to a crucial conundrum
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Okay, did Rachel just say what I thought she said?Rachel Riley wrote:You're both quite hot
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
7 - 4 = 3
3 x 100 = 300
300 + 8 = 308
(5-2) x 308 = 924
3 x 100 = 300
300 + 8 = 308
(5-2) x 308 = 924
- Mark Kudlowski
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
1st numbers
(100 + (4 x 8)) x 7
Me and the ravishing Rachel must be telepathic...
(100 + (4 x 8)) x 7
Me and the ravishing Rachel must be telepathic...
Last edited by Mark Kudlowski on Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Lesley Jeavons
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
(4x8) + 100 = 132
x 7
Dunno who I want to win - soooo many fab players!
x 7
Dunno who I want to win - soooo many fab players!
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4541
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Am I going mad or (100-8)*5*2+4=924?
(no, I didn't remember it from the recordings).
(no, I didn't remember it from the recordings).
- James Doohan
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st S
Was well proud of AUSPICES in round 3
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:36 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
First numbers in time!
( 100 * (7 - 4) + 8 ) * ( 5 - 2 ) = 924
Janet
( 100 * (7 - 4) + 8 ) * ( 5 - 2 ) = 924
Janet
- James Doohan
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st S
Hmmm, not so sure on that or am I missing somethingJanet Watkins wrote:First numbers in time!
( 100 * (7 - 4) + 8 ) * ( 5 - 2 ) = 924
Janet
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
She did. Well, they are, fair play.Ben Hunter wrote:Okay, did Rachel just say what I thought she said?Rachel Riley wrote:You're both quite hot
I believe that was me in the audience whooping like an overexcited girl at the end of Jeff's intro to Kirk.
- James Doohan
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st S
now i get it, 3x308james doohan wrote:Hmmm, not so sure on that or am I missing somethingJanet Watkins wrote:First numbers in time!
( 100 * (7 - 4) + 8 ) * ( 5 - 2 ) = 924
Janet
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
That's some amazing lurking Janet - 1 year and 4 months to make your first post!Janet Watkins wrote:First numbers in time!
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
- Location: Eastbourne
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Yeah i was wondering when he'd make it interesting. Awful miss!Jimmy Gough wrote:
- Chris Davies
- Series 61 Champion
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
I was going to post ANORECTAL, but Phil got it
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
That's a bit like criticising a top snooker player for missing a black off the spot. Yes, maybe you could pot that one ball yourself, but a top player is doing a lot more on that shot (with the striking, pace, position, etc) and that means occasional errors. The question is whether the different approach of the top players pays off more often than it causes them to miss, which it pretty clearly does in Kirk's case.Matt Morrison wrote:Awful miss!
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Just had a big memory lapse. Was the TTT just then MISSPENT or JAMBOREE?
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
I'm looking forward to the next snooker championship where I can say "Awful miss!" and you can tell me all about the other side of the coin.Charlie Reams wrote:That's a bit like criticising a top snooker player for missing a black off the spot. Yes, maybe you could pot that one ball yourself, but a top player is doing a lot more on that shot (with the striking, pace, position, etc) and that means occasional errors. The question is whether the different approach of the top players pays off more often than it causes them to miss, which it pretty clearly does in Kirk's case.Matt Morrison wrote:Awful miss!
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
That's an interesting comparison. Would have been pretty cool if jamborees had come out after the teaser. The last one was misspent.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
squeaky bum time
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Haha... love the eyes Kirk gave Neil there!
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
What a great conundrum spot. Hard luck Neil and well done Kirk.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
close on the conundrum at all Neil? tough one. great effort.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
course i know what it means Phil... eclampsia if you don't have a parking permit...
- Philip Jarvis
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Today is the first semi final, with Kirk up against Neil,
They remained neck and neck, both having nerves of steel,
There were cries from Jeff that “The champ’s here!”
When Kirk hit the button to “ECLAMPSIA”,
Although both played with passion and zeal, Kirk proved that he’s the real deal.
They remained neck and neck, both having nerves of steel,
There were cries from Jeff that “The champ’s here!”
When Kirk hit the button to “ECLAMPSIA”,
Although both played with passion and zeal, Kirk proved that he’s the real deal.
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
- Chris Davies
- Series 61 Champion
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
I would have won this one thanks in no small part to the first numbers and ANORECTAL, but Kirk beat me to the conundrum hands down. Excellent spot!
Last edited by Chris Davies on Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Brilliant! Well done Kirk. Well played Neil
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6281
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
you are nowJon Corby wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Kirk will piss this? Not to denigrate Neil who is a fantastic player, but Kirk is on another level to practically everyone ...
Nerves are a great leveller
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Wow! what a game.
Congratulations Kirk and commiserations to Neil for pulling out his personal best and just losing on the Conundrum.
This competitition just gets better and i am on tenterhooks waiting for the last two matches.
Congratulations Kirk and commiserations to Neil for pulling out his personal best and just losing on the Conundrum.
This competitition just gets better and i am on tenterhooks waiting for the last two matches.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:41 am
- Location: Stamford, Connecticut
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Jeff asked Neil the same question in the studio (one of the many things that gets cut due to TV time constraints) and I think he said something like that he wouldn't have got it in 30 minutes. I don't think I would have either.Matt Morrison wrote:close on the conundrum at all Neil? tough one. great effort.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
What Sid said. Neil was gracious in defeat (though gutted at coming so close), and Kirk's expression at the end said it all. Well played both - it was every bit as exciting to watch second time around.Matt Morrison wrote:close on the conundrum at all Neil? tough one. great effort.
- Philip Jarvis
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Yes - well played to both Kirk and Neil.
I was planning on doing todays verse in red.
Charlie - The option for using font colours has disappeared. Is that something to do with you?Charlie Reams wrote:Is there some rule that poems must be in blue? To think, I used to understand this place.
I was planning on doing todays verse in red.
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Has it?Philip Jarvis wrote:The option for using font colours has disappeared.
- John Bosley
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:52 pm
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Very exciting game.
Wife got 'delivery' somewhere along the way.
Wife got 'delivery' somewhere along the way.
-
- Series 59 Champion
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:26 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Stunning game, really enjoyed watching this in the audience. Well played Neil for giving Kirk such a close game. Can't really kick yourself when he goes and spots ECLAMPSIA in a split second. I was chuffed to have 'beaten' Kirk but frankly, I doubt he gives a shit. Just one game away, now!
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Yeah, that's almost what I was suggesting, without being disrespectful. I'm not sure what I'd have preferred really - a total nonsense conundrum like ECLAMPSIA that suits the contestant's abilities, or something a bit more reasonable that might have produced more of a crucial buzz-off. I wouldn't have got it in 30 days.Simon Myers wrote:Jeff asked Neil the same question in the studio (one of the many things that gets cut due to TV time constraints) and I think he said something like that he wouldn't have got it in 30 minutes. I don't think I would have either.Matt Morrison wrote:close on the conundrum at all Neil? tough one. great effort.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
You probably should have gone to the hospital with her rather than stayed and watched Countdown. Good commitment though.John Bosley wrote:Very exciting game.
Wife got 'delivery' somewhere along the way.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
There were not two Es.Matt Morrison wrote:You probably should have gone to the hospital with her rather than stayed and watched Countdown. Good commitment though.John Bosley wrote:Very exciting game.
Wife got 'delivery' somewhere along the way.
- Philip Jarvis
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Mine has - It just says "Font colour" with nothing underneath.Phil Reynolds wrote:Has it?Philip Jarvis wrote:The option for using font colours has disappeared.
Either Charlie's turned mine off or I've gone colour blind.
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Or you've just gone mental.Philip Jarvis wrote:Mine has - It just says "Font colour" with nothing underneath.Phil Reynolds wrote:Has it?Philip Jarvis wrote:The option for using font colours has disappeared.
Either Charlie's turned mine off or I've gone colour blind.
As usual, you just press Font colour and the colours appear for you to choose from.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
- Location: Eastbourne
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
I would've - just look it up on lexplorer.Matt Morrison wrote:I wouldn't have got it in 30 days.
- Philip Jarvis
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Nope - that doesn't work. Maybe something has happened with my Java. It's a bit like Apterous, I've never been able to see the letters on that, irrespective of which version I use. That's why I don't play. I was talking to Jonathon Coles at the Finals and he said the same thing happens to him.Matt Morrison wrote:Or you've just gone mental.
As usual, you just press Font colour and the colours appear for you to choose from.
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:29 am
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Well played Kirk and Neil , I thoroughly enjoyed watching that match from start to finish, yes it's nice to see games with loads of maxes but you can't beat these nerve tingler games between the top guns.
Here's hoping the second semi and final will be just as exciting.
Here's hoping the second semi and final will be just as exciting.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Thanks for all your kind words. That was such a tough game and Neil wouldn't let go, just like Julie in my QF. Getting an 8 point lead with SUBSPACE was pleasing (one of a few "pure" spots I had, i.e. not using stems and not being words that come up all the time but a word I'd heard of in real life) but then to have it knocked away with POLITEST was frustrating. When the letters rounds were running out to gain a lead I felt the nerves more. I remember needing a 9 in the last letters round and then getting three Ns and a Q. Nice. Neil pointed out to me just before Rachel did that it was to be crucial whatever happened in Round 14 and in the heat of the moment I hadn't noticed this. I couldn't avoid a crucial conundrum and my worst fears were going to be upon me. I'm not quite sure how I managed to see ECLAMPSIA instantly but boy was I happy. I was speechless after and felt tears in my eyes (you can see this on TV just about) but held them back somehow. Emotion city. Awesome game Neil.
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
IAWTPJojo Apollo wrote:Well played Kirk and Neil , I thoroughly enjoyed watching that match from start to finish, yes it's nice to see games with loads of maxes but you can't beat these nerve tingler games between the top guns.
Here's hoping the second semi and final will be just as exciting.
I've been watching Countdown on and off since 1982, and this was one of the best games I've seen. You can't beat a bit of tension, although if the adrenalin is that bad from an armchair, heaven knows what it's like for the contestants.
Edited as Kirk posted:
Yes, I noticed that Kirk. But I think it just endears you to the viewers if you get genuinely emotionally involved in something.Kirk Bevins wrote:I was speechless after and felt tears in my eyes (you can see this on TV just about) but held them back somehow. Emotion city. Awesome game Neil.
Last edited by Derek Hazell on Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
- Lesley Jeavons
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Brighton, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Today's game was AMAZING! What an absolute thrill to watch. My heart was actually racing during the last three rounds as I really felt for you both.
You are both such lovely and talented players - I didn't want either of you to lose.
Well done Kirk , and Neil to you too - very worthy second place, and making a player of Kirk's calibre sweat and squirm is surely a triumph in itself.
You are both such lovely and talented players - I didn't want either of you to lose.
Well done Kirk , and Neil to you too - very worthy second place, and making a player of Kirk's calibre sweat and squirm is surely a triumph in itself.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Spoilers for Wed 17 June 2009 [Series 60 1st SF]
Yes, this one should be good too. Mr. Consistency vs. Mr Occasionally Inspired. My money's on Hamish to pull another rabbit (or raccoon) out of his hat.Jojo Apollo wrote:Well played Kirk and Neil , I thoroughly enjoyed watching that match from start to finish, yes it's nice to see games with loads of maxes but you can't beat these nerve tingler games between the top guns.
Here's hoping the second semi and final will be just as exciting.