Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Ben Hunter »

JSP continues her octochamp run.
User avatar
Mike Brailsford
Acolyte
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: Blackpool, England
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Mike Brailsford »

OUTFIRES for 8 ?
John Brackstone
Rookie
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by John Brackstone »

superfit
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Charlie Reams »

Here's a website which will save you the embarrassment of submitting non-words:

http://www.apterous.org/lexplorer.php?w ... =0&p=0&s=0
http://www.apterous.org/lexplorer.php?w ... =0&p=0&s=0
John Brackstone
Rookie
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by John Brackstone »

you misunderstood me - I was describing Rachel not offering a Dc-beater !!!!!!!
User avatar
Mark Kudlowski
Enthusiast
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Mark Kudlowski »

2nd numbers alt: (75 + 2 + 1 ) x 9
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Martin Gardner »

Why do I have an urge for pink schapps. No serious that's a lovely outfit, I think with her blond hair and pale complexion light pastel colours and white suit her well, such as the floral dress yesterday and the peach "Dorris Day" dress today. Oh and it was a good game too!
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Martin Gardner wrote:Why do I have an urge for pink schapps. No serious that's a lovely outfit, I think with her blond hair and pale complexion light pastel colours and white suit her well, such as the floral dress yesterday and the peach "Dorris Day" dress today. Oh and it was a good game too!
This is what happens when I roll my head on the keyboard:

9p0-[-0o7y6y67op[[pytu67rty87fyy8p; fddt[;;'p
Eoin Monaghan
Kiloposter
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Eoin Monaghan »

Phil Reynolds wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:Why do I have an urge for pink schapps. No serious that's a lovely outfit, I think with her blond hair and pale complexion light pastel colours and white suit her well, such as the floral dress yesterday and the peach "Dorris Day" dress today. Oh and it was a good game too!
This is what happens when I roll my head on the keyboard:

9p0-[-0o7y6y67op[[pytu67rty87fyy8p; fddt[;;'p[/quo
you can type proper english??
User avatar
Richard Priest
Devotee
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Richard Priest »

This was the first of Cate's games that I saw live in the studio, and when I saw her 2nd game the other day it reminded me of this one in that she stepped up a gear in part 3.

Gerald was a nice guy, he sat just in front of me in the audience for the next show and we were comparing words and solutions.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kirk Bevins »

John Brackstone wrote:superfit
If SUPERFIT describes Rachel, who does the 9 in round 12 refer to? CUNTHEADS.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Yay! I got a max game today (I'm getting quite good at this in recent times - if only I'd waited a few more years to apply). I had a DC beater in GARPIKES in round 2 (obtained as I missed GARPIKE in my own run).

I 'beat' the poor challenger 131-16. Would have been quite fun had this been in the studio. :twisted:
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Paul Howe »

Kirk Bevins wrote:Yay! I got a max game today (I'm getting quite good at this in recent times - if only I'd waited a few more years to apply). I had a DC beater in GARPIKES in round 2 (obtained as I missed GARPIKE in my own run).

I 'beat' the poor challenger 131-16. Would have been quite fun had this been in the studio. :twisted:
You're a merciless beast Kirk, I'd hate to win that emphatically (would love the 131, but would like my opponent to grab a decent haul too).

Indeed, when I was beating Keith Maynard 50-0 my feelings alternated between embarrassment at the scoreline and a looming sense of dread that I'd somehow still manage to bottle it.
User avatar
Richard Priest
Devotee
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Richard Priest »

Paul Howe wrote: Indeed, when I was beating Keith Maynard 50-0 my feelings alternated between embarrassment at the scoreline and a looming sense of dread that I'd somehow still manage to bottle it.
I know what you mean, I felt a bit like that when I was 34-0 up on Richard Wilson. I was glad when he finally got some points on the next round but when he beat me with a well-risked 7 in the next I too started to fear a comeback.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Rich Priest wrote:
Paul Howe wrote: Indeed, when I was beating Keith Maynard 50-0 my feelings alternated between embarrassment at the scoreline and a looming sense of dread that I'd somehow still manage to bottle it.
I know what you mean, I felt a bit like that when I was 34-0 up on Richard Wilson. I was glad when he finally got some points on the next round but when he beat me with a well-risked 7 in the next I too started to fear a comeback.
Wow. Maybe I don't have compassion or something but if I can win by 110 points I'll try to do just that.
User avatar
Kieran Child
Enthusiast
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kieran Child »

^ Not lack of compassion. Just lack of Romance. If I could win by 110, I'd try to get it so I won by 100. That would be so stylish.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Kieran Child wrote:^ Not lack of compassion. Just lack of Romance. If I could win by 110, I'd try to get it so I won by 100. That would be so stylish.
And not get the record? Nice one.
User avatar
Ben Wilson
Legend
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: North Hykeham

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Ben Wilson »

Susie was a bit short with her guess of 1200 shows in today's intro.
User avatar
Kieran Child
Enthusiast
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kieran Child »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Kieran Child wrote:^ Not lack of compassion. Just lack of Romance. If I could win by 110, I'd try to get it so I won by 100. That would be so stylish.
And not get the record? Nice one.
But if you get the record, then in two years time someone will beat it and you'll be forgotten.
If you get exactly the same score as your opponent, but with another 1 in front of it, then it doesn't matter what anyone does. In two years time it will still look stylish.
User avatar
Philip Jarvis
Enthusiast
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Philip Jarvis »

Alternative numbers:

R1 - (4 -1) x 50 = 150 - 8 = 142 x 4 = 568

R2 - (9 -2) x (100 + 1) = 707 - 5 = 702
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Charlie Reams »

Kieran Child wrote: But if you get the record, then in two years time someone will beat it and you'll be forgotten.
Yeah, like that Julian... oh, what's his name again?
User avatar
Kieran Child
Enthusiast
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kieran Child »

Julian still has the record?
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Kieran Child wrote:Julian still has the record?
No. Someone beat it, and now he's forgotten. Humour, see?
User avatar
Kieran Child
Enthusiast
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kieran Child »

:roll: Julian's remembered because of the 146 more than anything.
If you want to map this to what I said, two years before Julian's 146, the highest 15 rounder was by Ian McMenzie...

Had Ian McMenzie scored 100 points higher than someone, it would have still been cool today, but no. He went and got a record, then it got broken, now he's not really more notable than other countdown contestants.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Paul Howe »

Kieran Child wrote::roll: Julian's remembered because of the 146 more than anything.
.
Nope, Julian's remembered because he consistently came up with dazzling words (and not just your usual high probability stuff) at a time when getting that stupendously good was a lot harder than it is now, and he had a certain aura about him that noone else, impressive though they may have been, has ever come close to replicating.
User avatar
Ben Wilson
Legend
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: North Hykeham

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Ben Wilson »

Paul Howe wrote:
Kieran Child wrote::roll: Julian's remembered because of the 146 more than anything.
.
Nope, Julian's remembered because he consistently came up with dazzling words (and not just your usual high probability stuff) at a time when getting that stupendously good was a lot harder than it is now, and he had a certain aura about him that noone else, impressive though they may have been, has ever come close to replicating.
He's also remembered for being able to define almost every word he declared, which I don't think any of the superstars since (Conor, Kirkie, even Craig) have been able to do.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Ben Wilson wrote:
He's also remembered for being able to define almost every word he declared, which I don't think any of the superstars since (Conor, Kirkie, even Craig) have been able to do.
Oi - I wasn't asked to define them all and ones I were asked to define I could sometimes get them, e.g. NAIANT involved a horizontal fish and TOWAI was a tree. Give me some credit mate!
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Charlie Reams »

Kirk Bevins wrote:NAIANT involved a horizontal fish and TOWAI was a tree.
As I said, you really should write dictionaries. Albeit short ones.
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 26th Match

Post by Mike Brown »

Ben Wilson wrote:Susie was a bit short with her guess of 1200 shows in today's intro.
Indeed she was! And by my reckoning, she is due to make her 2,000th appearance at the first quarter-final.
Post Reply