Spoilers for Wed 18th March

tomrowell · Post by **tomrowell** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:29 pm

Witness the fitness

Charlie Reams · Post by **Charlie Reams** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:34 pm

Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?

Mike Brailsford · Post by **Mike Brailsford** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:35 pm

DOMINEER also for 8 ?

Paul Howe · Post by **Paul Howe** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:46 pm

Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?

Yesterday. I miss you Kirky

Today's "champion" is rather lovely though.

And I'm not too sure who the DC guest is, but I think he's done really well this week.

That is all.

tomrowell · Post by **tomrowell** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:47 pm

Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?

it depends on personal preference, but it would appear to me to be today.

i had DOMINEER as well. after a nervous start this guy is looking good

tomrowell · Post by **tomrowell** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:49 pm

PENISES?

Jimmy Gough · Post by **Jimmy Gough** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:50 pm

tomrowell wrote:PENISES?

I had that too.

tomrowell · Post by **tomrowell** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:52 pm

we both have penises. what a relief

Charlie Reams · Post by **Charlie Reams** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:53 pm

tomrowell wrote:PENISES?

Rachel actually got that herself and there was a great shot of her standing next to it on the board, but they cut it out

tomrowell · Post by **tomrowell** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:00 pm

Charlie Reams wrote:
tomrowell wrote:PENISES?
Rachel actually got that herself and there was a great shot of her standing next to it on the board, but they cut it out

sure thats not just a fantasy of yours...

SANTEROS?

Mike Brailsford · Post by **Mike Brailsford** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:06 pm

7 x 3 = 21

21 - 6 = 15

50 + 15 = 65

65 x 5 = 325

Mark Kudlowski · Post by **Mark Kudlowski** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:10 pm

BEANIES for round 8 ?

3rd numbers: (50 x 6) + (7 x 5) - (7 + 3)

Darren Carter · Post by **Darren Carter** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:32 pm

Mark Kudlowski wrote:BEANIES for round 8 ?

3rd numbers: (50 x 6) + (7 x 5) - (7 + 3)

I went for (50 + 3) x 6 = 318 + 7 = 325

Lots of different ways of doing it.

Jimmy Gough · Post by **Jimmy Gough** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:43 pm

Wow, you guys really rock at the numbers

Eoin Monaghan · Post by **Eoin Monaghan** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:09 pm

Marque for round 13.

Neil Zussman · Post by **Neil Zussman** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:28 pm

Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.

Or Barque, I think.
Also is Sapiens allowed, in the penis round?
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).

Darren Carter · Post by **Darren Carter** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:45 pm

Neil Zussman wrote:
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).

Who cares - she's better looking than Kirk.....

Simon Myers · Post by **Simon Myers** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Neil Zussman wrote:
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
Or Barque, I think.
Also is Sapiens allowed, in the penis round?
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).

No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Tracey Lilly · Post by **Tracey Lilly** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:32 pm

I went for (50 + 3) x 6 = 318 + 7 = 325

Lots of different ways of doing it.[/quote]

Me too, and I matched mentored, roughed and basins but nothing inspirational except barque.

All seemed a bit of an anti climax today but 93 was a very respectful winning score.

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:58 pm

Simon Myers wrote: No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Yeah, I would have beaten her 115-6. That's the lowest ever opponent's score and joint highest points difference (109) with Julian Fell. I was so annoyed I missed that by just one game.

Martin Gardner · Post by **Martin Gardner** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:00 pm

Neil Zussman wrote:
Eoin Monaghan wrote:Marque for round 13.
Or Barque, I think.
Also is Sapiens allowed, in the penis round?
And no disrespect meant, but if Kirk had been on today, I think Hazel Wheeler's record may have come under threat. (But maybe I'm being unfair, and it just seems that the contestant is worse than she actually is because I'm comparing her to Kirk).

There must be some sort of homo-sapiens joke here.

Jimmy Gough · Post by **Jimmy Gough** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:09 pm

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Simon Myers wrote: No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Yeah, I would have beaten her 115-6. That's the lowest ever opponent's score and joint highest points difference (109) with Julian Fell. I was so annoyed I missed that by just one game.

Would you really like to've done that though? It must feel so bad and awkward. I mean, sure, they deserve to be beaten convincingly if they're shit but to totally beat the shit out of somebody on TV must almost be as bad as losing. Especially if it was some old woman or a little kid.

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:10 pm

Jimmy Gough wrote: Would you really have like to do that though? It must feel so bad and awkward. I mean, sure, they deserve to be beaten convincingly if they're shit but to totally beat the shit out of somebody on TV must almost be as bad as losing. Especially if it was some old woman or a little kid.

Yeah, when you're on I suggest go for 5s and 6s mate to try to soften any blow you might cause.

To be honest I never cared too much about the points difference - I just wanted a massive score and didn't want to be beaten on any round. It didn't feel awkward to beat people by 70 or 80 points regularly, which is probably why so many of my opponents seemed miserable!

Kathleen Batlle · Post by **Kathleen Batlle** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:12 pm

Mark Kudlowski wrote:BEANIES for round 8 ?

3rd numbers: (50 x 6) + (7 x 5) - (7 + 3)

I got the numbers like this too. Stephen did well, but I missed Kirk today. I didn't realise just how enthusiastic he was and how thrilled he was when he beat the record. I thought Kezra was very beautiful and accepted defeat graciously. Shame we won't see her again.

Adam Dexter · Post by **Adam Dexter** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:37 pm

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Simon Myers wrote: No you're right, Kirk destroyed her from the audience. He was going on about how he could've had a record against her had she appeared during his run. I don't remember his score was though, I'll point him in this direction later.

Yeah, I would have beaten her 115-6. That's the lowest ever opponent's score and joint highest points difference (109) with Julian Fell. I was so annoyed I missed that by just one game.

However, the fittie might have put you off somewhat!

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:42 pm

Adam Dexter wrote:
However, the fittie might have put you off somewhat!

Well I saw her more when playing watching the screen from the audience. When you're playing in the studio you don't look at your opponent too often - well I didn't anyway!

Rosemary Roberts · Post by **Rosemary Roberts** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:16 pm

Jimmy Gough wrote:to totally beat the shit out of somebody on TV must almost be as bad as losing. Especially if it was some old woman or a little kid.

Just be sure you guys remember that if I ever get on!

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:29 am

Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?

Don't think it can be today - one of them's got really crooked teeth and the other one's a woman.

Matthew Green · Post by **Matthew Green** » Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:56 pm

Phil Reynolds wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:Is it today or tomorrow with the really fit contestant?
Don't think it can be today - one of them's got really crooked teeth and the other one's a woman.

Hahahaha!

Does anyone else think she looked like an Asian version of the policewoman out of Shameless?

Howard Somerset · Post by **Howard Somerset** » Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:11 pm

Matthew Green wrote:Does anyone else think she looked like an Asian version of the policewoman out of Shameless?

Thanks, Matthew. Now I know who I was trying to think she looked like.

Jon Corby · Post by **Jon Corby** » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:04 pm

Only just catching up on shows...

Kezra

c4countdown

Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March

Re: Spoilers for Wed 18th March