Spoilers for Tuesday 27th April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Spoilers for Tuesday 27th April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

I wonder if something went on behind the scenes with the conundrum; can only think of one example of the conundrum already being a word before, ostensibly because of a cock-up.
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
Toby McDonald
Kiloposter
Posts: 1096
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:23 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Toby McDonald »

PROFUNDA/PANDOURA in R5

R3 Alt.: (25*6-1)*(9-4) = 745
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13271
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Rhys Benjamin wrote: Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:51 pm I wonder if something went on behind the scenes with the conundrum; can only think of one example of the conundrum already being a word before, ostensibly because of a cock-up.
There was the SPANGLIER/RELAPSING example, which was a cock-up, but also the GERANIUMS/MEASURING one, which I think was intentional. Some discussion is available here.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13271
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

By the way that teatime teaser was a bit tenuous today:

IRONGOLD --> No iron or gold, it's all about ore. --> DROOLING

I suppose it's based on ore/awe being homophones, and if you're in awe of something you start drooling. (You don't but it's the only way this could make sense.)
Sam Cappleman-Lynes
Enthusiast
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:30 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Sam Cappleman-Lynes »

Gavin Chipper wrote: Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:03 pm
Rhys Benjamin wrote: Tue Apr 27, 2021 3:51 pm I wonder if something went on behind the scenes with the conundrum; can only think of one example of the conundrum already being a word before, ostensibly because of a cock-up.
There was the SPANGLIER/RELAPSING example, which was a cock-up, but also the GERANIUMS/MEASURING one, which I think was intentional. Some discussion is available here.
There's also GANGLIONS/SINGALONG and ALLOCUTES/LACTULOSE, probably among others. These sorts of conundrum, while rarer than "normal" ones, are not horribly uncommon, especially in series finals.
Stewart Gordon
Enthusiast
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Stewart Gordon »

Any clue where the pronunciation "ampyules" can have come from? It doesn't match with what Lexico says, and I'm not aware of any word in which 'ou' makes a 'yu' sound. I've a feeling I've heard the word mispronounced in the same way before.
Ray Wilding
Devotee
Posts: 564
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:32 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Ray Wilding »

Stewart Gordon wrote: Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:31 pm Any clue where the pronunciation "ampyules" can have come from? It doesn't match with what Lexico says, and I'm not aware of any word in which 'ou' makes a 'yu' sound. I've a feeling I've heard the word mispronounced in the same way before.
"/ˈampjuːl/" is the pronunciation of the US spelling(s) without the "o".
User avatar
Rhys Benjamin
Postmaster General
Posts: 3102
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Rhys Benjamin »

But in all of the examples given, the scramble is a plural and it has been established that conundrums are no longer plurals.
The forum's resident JAILBAKER, who has SPONDERED several times...
Tom S
Kiloposter
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:38 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Tom S »

Rhys Benjamin wrote: Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:06 pm But in all of the examples given, the scramble is a plural and it has been established that conundrums are no longer plurals.
https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_7237 - here's an example of one where the scramble wasn't a plural.
Stewart Gordon
Enthusiast
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27 April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by Stewart Gordon »

Rhys Benjamin wrote: Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:06 pm But in all of the examples given, the scramble is a plural and it has been established that conundrums are no longer plurals.
I would expect the policy is to never make conundrum solutions plurals (except pluralia tantum), but to count plurals nonetheless when checking that a solution is unique. But when a conundrum with multiple solutions slips through the net, either solution is accepted. But if the solution a contestant gives in this scenario happens to be a plural, is it still accepted?

Of course, the scramble isn't a valid solution even if it's a word. So this is why GERANIUMS wasn't accepted. Indeed, whenever two of the possible permutations are valid words, one of them has to be the scramble, such that the other one is the solution.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 27th April 2021 (Series 83, Preliminary 82)

Post by James Robinson »

1st Numbers Alt.: ((9 + 4 - 1) x 6 x 10) + 25 = 745
Post Reply