Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

User avatar
Matthew Green
Devotee
Posts: 716
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matthew Green »

Will pre-tournament favourite Jon put the 'lime' in Corby or will Richard prove Simon Cowell right and show us all that Brittains Got talent?

(and before anyone starts, Frankie Boyle repeats his jokes too...)
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum
User avatar
Ian Dent
Devotee
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Ian Dent »

Is Corby really the favourite?

I thought he was a "normal person" style underdog.


Oh well, I'll still be cheering him on tonight.
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

I'll put a tenner on Richard getting the word MOONSET: ie where the landings were faked
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Jon Corby »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:I'll put a tenner on Richard getting the word MOONSET: ie where the landings were faked
Ian Dent wrote:Is Corby really the favourite?

I thought he was a "normal person" style underdog.


Oh well, I'll still be cheering him on tonight.
He's everything to all people.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Jon Corby »

Matthew Green wrote:Will pre-tournament favourite Jon put the 'lime' in Corby
I only just got that (I may be a little slow after a few pints at lunchtime)

Awesome.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Charlie Reams »

Ian Dent wrote:Is Corby really the favourite?
Yes
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

PEEING may have seemed embarrassing, but I would have been declaring MINGE... which isn't even in dictionary... well, not in my ancient Chambers. Will have to check on apterous.
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

oh well, seems it is in ODE... not that it would have been much use...
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Martin Gardner »

LADIFIES beat me (very very good). Other than that, DONATOR and TORNADO as equallers. Also for the numbers, (25+7+5)*9. There's a nice 111 rule which is 37 * 3 = 111, so any target with three identical digits can be factorized that way.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Kai Laddiman »

And the words start with BIOPOT...
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Kai Laddiman »

POOPIES :lol:
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

"There's a nice 111 rule which is 37 * 3 = 111, so any target with three identical digits can be factorized that way."

Will add that to the how-to thread if you don't mind, Martin.
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

Ooh, I spotted CASSATA!

[pleased]
User avatar
Mark Kudlowski
Enthusiast
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Mark Kudlowski »

Second Numbers Game:

(75 + 3) x 8 = 624; 624 + ((100 + 50) / 25) = 630
User avatar
Mark Kudlowski
Enthusiast
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Mark Kudlowski »

Third Numbers Game:

9 x (10-1) x 8 = 648; 648 + 5 = 653.
Last edited by Mark Kudlowski on Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Katherine Birkett
Rookie
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Katherine Birkett »

KATHERINE'S RESULTS

Letters 1 - FAILED

Letters 2 - GLOATED

Letters 3 - LOAN (oops)

Letters 4 - PEEING (oops x2)

Numbers 1 - 332 (yay - 1 off!)

Got Tea Time Teaser of TROTTERS

Letters 5 - CHAINS

Letters 6 - BIGOT

Letters 7 - EPISODE

Letters 8 - COASTS

Numbers 2 - That infamous mental freeze again!

Tea Time teaser 2 - Got MUDDIEST

Letters 9 - disallowed TOMMY

Letters 10 - HORSIER

Letters 11 - ALONE

Numbers 3 - 650 (3 off) - WELL DONE RACHEL!!!!

CONUNDRUM - Nowhere near.
Katherine Birkett
Rookie
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Katherine Birkett »

Kai Laddiman wrote:And the words start with BIOPOT...
Clinically proven to enhance your digestive tract...... ;)
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Martin Gardner »

I got the conundrum quite quickly but blobbed on the numbers. I couldn't beat Jon on an round, apart from his disallowed word. I suppose when you have aguy who raises money for charity playing a Hilterian, not hard to choose who you want to win.

PS CASSATA I suppose comes from the Italian CASSARE which means to break. Am I right?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Martin Gardner »

Jon Corby wrote:
Matthew Green wrote:Will pre-tournament favourite Jon put the 'lime' in Corby
I only just got that (I may be a little slow after a few pints at lunchtime)

Awesome.
I don't get it! lol!
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Michael Simmonds
Rookie
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:43 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Michael Simmonds »

Another alternative to 3rd numbers game:- 4 + 9 = 13 x 10 - 1 = 129 x 5 + 8
User avatar
Stewart Holden
Series 51 Champion
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:53 am
Location: Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Stewart Holden »

I'm completely taken aback by today's show. I'd never seen a show with Richard Brittain before, but the guy appears to be nearly illiterate, not to mention a bit of a cock. How on earth did he win a series? Did the other finalists not show up?
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

Martin Gardner wrote:...playing a Hilterian...
He liks Paris Hilton?

Seriously though SALONEEN? The way Susie pretended it might actually be plausible was quality!
Katherine Birkett
Rookie
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Katherine Birkett »

Stewart Holden wrote: How on earth did he win a series?
Witchcraft?
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Paul Howe »

Excellent performance from Jon, thought there was a perfect game in the offing until the CASSATA round.

On the downside I can't think of another game with such diabolical letters selections. I had a 3 in the MOTIF round. Hopefullly the shuffling was sorted out for the later games or we could have same painful rounds coming up.
Matthew Green wrote:Will pre-tournament favourite Jon put the 'lime' in Corby
lulz :D
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

Hold on Countmax lists GANDISEEG as a valid word :x
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

Corby + LIME= Cor bLIMEy, just for those who struggled like me...
User avatar
Ben Wilson
Legend
Posts: 4539
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: North Hykeham

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Ben Wilson »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:Hold on Countmax lists GANDISEEG as a valid word :x
You must have an old version then ;)
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

would mAake basis for great cryptic crossword clue. nice spot.

Flippin' 'eck, Corby goes well with lime (3, 6)
Junaid Mubeen
Series 59 Champion
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:26 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Junaid Mubeen »

Stewart Holden wrote:I'm completely taken aback by today's show. I'd never seen a show with Richard Brittain before, but the guy appears to be nearly illiterate, not to mention a bit of a cock. How on earth did he win a series? Did the other finalists not show up?
I say we applaud Richard for having the balls to turn up and compete in CoC. I know Richard was far from his best because he was relatively out of practise. But he won a series containing Steven Briers, which takes some doing. Moreover, the prospect of playing Corby must have been off putting but he came nevertheless, rather than staying at home and shitting his pants. Takes some guts, hey Stewart? As someone who's met the guy, I can say he is slightly eccentric and downright weird at times. But a cock he is not.
Last edited by Junaid Mubeen on Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

or

Add lime to get amazing player (5)

or

Flippin' 'eck, Corby eats lime! (3, 6)

OK, am shutting up now.
Clare Sudbery
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:18 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Clare Sudbery »

PS I know nothing about RB, saw him for first time today, but he looked to me like he was extremely uncomfortable. It's easy for people to come across as cold when actually they're just shy, nervous, struggling to conform, whatever.
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Martin Gardner »

Yeah I've only ever beaten one series champ in real life or Apterous, which is Richard Brittain, and I think I've beaten him three times out of four. In one game when I got slightly ahead (not that much) he started going for completely made up stuff. So yeah, I think he's out of practice. Re: perfect game, I think Corby only missed the max in three rounds? Of course for CASSATO^ and the conundrum, he didn't score anything.

For more general stuff, the fact that Rachel puts the numbers up more slowly means you can actually write them down in time! Not to mention, isn't that the first time she's beaten the contestants on the numbers? Well done!
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Stewart Holden
Series 51 Champion
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:53 am
Location: Northern Ireland
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Stewart Holden »

Junaid Mubeen wrote:I say we applaud Richard for having the balls to turn up and compete in CoC. I know Richard was far from his best because he was relatively out of practise. But he won a series containing Steven Briers, which takes some doing. Moreover, the prospect of playing Corby must have been off putting but he came nevertheless, rather than staying at home and shitting his pants. Takes some guts, hey Stewart? As someone who's met the guy, I can say he is slightly eccentric and downright weird at times. But a cock he is not.


I have hardly watched the show in the last five years so I don't know how good Corby or Briers are or aren't, I was just going on my impression of him today combined with realising halfway through that he'd won a series in the past. His level of ability seems very questionable (OMMIT* ??) and messing around on the conundrum like that in a CofC, or any show for that matter, is enough to earn the 'cock' epithet from me. If I'm wrong then so be it, I'm just saying what I saw.
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Martin Gardner »

Paul Howe wrote:Excellent performance from Jon, thought there was a perfect game in the offing until the CASSATA round.

On the downside I can't think of another game with such diabolical letters selections. I had a 3 in the MOTIF round. Hopefullly the shuffling was sorted out for the later games or we could have same painful rounds coming up.
Matthew Green wrote:Will pre-tournament favourite Jon put the 'lime' in Corby
lulz :D
I got OMIT in this round. I still haven't checked my 'risky five' from earlier in the game. It's true that the letters shuffling has changed, maybe they've just gone for pure randomness, I don't know.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Clare Sudbery wrote:I know nothing about RB, saw him for first time today, but he looked to me like he was extremely uncomfortable. It's easy for people to come across as cold when actually they're just shy, nervous, struggling to conform, whatever.
Was a bit cringeworthy watching RB shrink in his seat as Jeff read out his hobbies - chess, birdwatching, classical music, and another, trainspotting or something.
I'm not rubbishing any of these hobbies by the way, but I've certainly experienced plenty of geeks who don't like to be reminded how geeky they are.
User avatar
Matthew Green
Devotee
Posts: 716
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matthew Green »

Richard Brittain is my new hero.
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum
Chris Corby
Devotee
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:54 pm
Location: Farnborough, Hampshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Chris Corby »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Clare Sudbery wrote:I know nothing about RB, saw him for first time today, but he looked to me like he was extremely uncomfortable. It's easy for people to come across as cold when actually they're just shy, nervous, struggling to conform, whatever.
Was a bit cringeworthy watching RB shrink in his seat as Jeff read out his hobbies - chess, birdwatching, classical music, and another, trainspotting or something.
I'm not rubbishing any of these hobbies by the way, but I've certainly experienced plenty of geeks who don't like to be reminded how geeky they are.

The one you forgot was collecting wild mushrooms
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Chris Corby wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:Was a bit cringeworthy watching RB shrink in his seat as Jeff read out his hobbies - chess, birdwatching, classical music, and another, trainspotting or something.
The one you forgot was collecting wild mushrooms
That was the one!
I reckon he's a bit leftfield, rather than sorting them by alphabetical order of latin names, they're organised by Mushroom Power Factor, a combination of deadliness and depth of colour.
User avatar
Richard Brittain
Series Champ
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Richard Brittain »

Unfortunately I haven't been able to watch the show yet. But, I'm curious as to why I inspire such hatred in a certain nerdy section of the population.

Matt, I don't consider any of those hobbies geeky, apart from chess, and I don't recall shrinking in my seat. If I was, it had nothing to do with what Jeff was saying.

I was considering replying to all the wild and wacky accusations directed at me in this thread, but then I thought... nah. Instead, I suggest some of you get out more.
User avatar
Richard Brittain
Series Champ
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Richard Brittain »

Matthew Green wrote:Richard Brittain is my new hero.
Thank you.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Matt Morrison wrote: and another, trainspotting or something.
I'm not rubbishing any of these hobbies by the way, but I've certainly experienced plenty of geeks who don't like to be reminded how geeky they are.
Oi, lay off the trainspotting mate. You clearly are stereotyping that trainspotters are geeks and some aren't. Admittedly a few are but I'm sure you get that in a lot of hobbies which involve obsession, uh hum....
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Oh and for what it's worth, I didn't speak to Brittain much whilst in the studio but watching from the audience, I was absolutely amazed at how much he was risking. No offence, when he buzzed instantly for the conundrum, I knew he'd say "sorry I've fluffed it" but he actually tried guessing a ridiculous word which I couldn't help but laugh at. It certainly has been the most "odd" performance so far.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Richard Brittain wrote:Matt, I don't consider any of those hobbies geeky, apart from chess.
Didn't mean to cause any offence which is why I did my best to make it clear I wasn't rubbishing any of the aforementioned hobbies.
(hope you weren't suggesting I was hating on you - I suggest you maintain your tactics of ignoring it 'cos other threads seem to be even more scatching of you, no idea why)

Admittedly you can make any 'cool' hobby 'geeky' eg. skateboarding - keeping a list of all the places you've skated in a book and marking them out of 10 for excitement and ride smoothness
...just like you can make any 'geeky' hobby 'cool' eg. trainspotting - get a group of mates, break into a trainyard, last one to find the train with the lowest number has to run round naked smeared in oil

You have every right to not think of those hobbies as geeky, but I fear you'll be in the minority.
Kirk Bevins wrote:Oi, lay off the trainspotting mate. You clearly are stereotyping that trainspotters are geeks and some aren't.
Hehe... again no offence intended, my granddad's a trainspotter and I've got 'nuff respect for him!
Though he's nowadays more a simple 'train photographer' - it's the jotting down numbers in a book I've never understood - can you explain what it is that you're actually noting, and where the pleasure is derived from? Maybe I'd understand it better if you could, but again, certainly don't hold it against anyone - each to their own. I used to collect trading cards and cut bits out of magazines until I discovered how cool I was. ;)
Katherine Birkett
Rookie
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Katherine Birkett »

Richard Brittain wrote: Matt, I don't consider any of those hobbies geeky
I certainly don't think birdwatching is geeky, especially given the success of Springwatch and Autumnwatch. It's almost mainstream now. Comedian Rory McGrath is a birdwatcher and has penned his autobiography, giving it the title 'Bearded Tit'. A very good book, Richard!

Are you doing the Back Garden Birdwatch the weekend after next?
User avatar
Richard Brittain
Series Champ
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Richard Brittain »

No Katherine, I don't watch any of that stuff. In fact I would consider that quite geeky, watching an eggy BBC show with Alan Titchmarsh, doing what he says and grouping together with other BBC-style people carrying unnecessary plastic walking sticks. My birdwatching involves going out into the hills and sitting with a pair of leather-bound binoculars, watching while contemplating the meaning of Leviticus. The same applies to mushrooming. I don't note anything down.
Katherine Birkett
Rookie
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Katherine Birkett »

Oh dear - I normally go birdwatching with my Opticron GS815 telescope with 20-60x zoom lens and tripod, together with my Opticron Savanna 8x42 binoculars....... first bird I saw through the telescope was a Slavonian Grebe....

** adopts shifty facial expression and goes to ground **
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Matt Morrison wrote: ...just like you can make any 'geeky' hobby 'cool' eg. trainspotting - get a group of mates, break into a trainyard, last one to find the train with the lowest number has to run round naked smeared in oil
Ha, I'd easily win. I can tell just from looking at the type of wagon if it's a 500-series wagon, or a '460' ballast wagon or a 4 digit green 34xx box.

As for what we do, without explaining it fully as I get fed up with explaining, is we write down the train number (and this makes sense to us, it's not random) and underline them in pre-printed books which list all the trains that exist. Your task is to find them all.

The difficulties come that some trains may only run in Scotland (such as Scotrail units) so you have some travelling to do. Passenger trains are easiest (particularly long distance services, e.g. two days on Doncaster station and you've cleared your National Expresses) but wagons are the most fun and hardest as one day they could be carrying stuff to Cornwall and the next they are on the Doncaster - Aberdeen freight train. It's such a nice feeling (well, comparatively!) when you see a train that you haven't seen since you started spotting 15 years ago.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Ha! Great stuff Kirk... I do have more of an appreciation of trains than you'd probably think, entirely down to my granddad of course. He tells me from time to time about certain train passing through our station, I find it interesting to listen to other people talking about their passions regardless of what those passions are (to a certain extent), and I've often accompanied him down to the sea wall to take a picture of some special edition steam service or a rare diesel engine or something, though my interest has of course been almost entirely about the photography. Some of my earliest memories are having a ride on the Christmas Special they used to run on the Watercress Line, and of drawing pictures of Intercity 125s on family holidays down to Devon before I lived here.

In fact I read in the local paper the other day that the point where the track meets the sea wall and begins running alongside the coast here in Teignmouth is the #1 most photographed train line in the whole of the UK? It is rather beautiful, especially in summer.

And thanks also for your explanations - I presume numbers refer to specific engines as opposed to anything less fixed like routes and lines? Must be a pretty hard hobby to organise too, what with new engines being made all the time and old ones being retired and the rolling stock always changing? I suppose the idea is more to please yourself by spotting a rare one (as you say) than by spotting them all (as you say, but I imagine with tongue firmly in cheek). But when you spot a rare engine (is it just engines, or coaches too?) do you know it is rare by its number or by looking at it, and the number is just a means of tracking it?
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Matt Morrison wrote: In fact I read in the local paper the other day that the point where the track meets the sea wall and begins running alongside the coast here in Teignmouth is the #1 most photographed train line in the whole of the UK? It is rather beautiful, especially in summer.

And thanks also for your explanations - I presume numbers refer to specific engines as opposed to anything less fixed like routes and lines? Must be a pretty hard hobby to organise too, what with new engines being made all the time and old ones being retired and the rolling stock always changing? I suppose the idea is more to please yourself by spotting a rare one (as you say) than by spotting them all (as you say, but I imagine with tongue firmly in cheek). But when you spot a rare engine (is it just engines, or coaches too?) do you know it is rare by its number or by looking at it, and the number is just a means of tracking it?

Ah yes, I've been to Teignmouth a few times and indeed that stretch of line between Starcross and Dawlish is photographed often.

You don't often get "rare" trains. If you were to see a Scotrail unit down south, this could be classed as "rare" even though it's common as muck up North. What you mean by "rare" is (I think) ones that I've never seen before. When you've done it for so long, I don't need my book to check as you memorise them. Imagine a list of 35 class 87s, all numbered 87001 to 87035. These are locos pulling passengers (sadly most are abroad/scrapped now). Imagine having them all underlined apart from say 87023. A big gap in the book and you've wanted it for years. You spend hours on loads of stations and keep noting 87013, 87024 (close!) and so on - when you finally get 87023 it's great. It's not "rare" (as it might be common for someone else), it's just "rare" for you I suppose.

It's a bit like real life bingo stretching the UK, but more fun and more cold.

Every year new books come out with updated lists based on what's changed the previous year. Spotters don't have to wait all year though - there are many groups/sites/forums online that discuss new locos or wagons coming into the country and their number series, or indeed buy magazines which are ridiculously overpriced.

P.s Charlie or whoever, could you perhaps move these discussions to Off-topic?
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Kirk Bevins wrote:P.s Charlie or whoever, could you perhaps move these discussions to Off-topic?
Can we call the topic "Extremely geeky hobbies" just to annoy Kirk and Richard? :)
But yes, sorry, I kind of got carried away - should have moved it elsewhere first. I might get round to replying you and pestering you with more queries if/when Charlie moves it, Kirk.
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Jimmy Gough »

I thought Corby was great, it's a shame I missed his series. Is a Corby-O'Donnell final possible? Cos if it is it could well be the best final ever :D.
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

Jimmy wrote:I thought Corby was great, it's a shame I missed his series. Is a Corby-O'Donnell final possible? Cos if it is it could well be the best final ever :D.
They cannot meet until the final - that is correct
Joe Denniss
Rookie
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:39 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Joe Denniss »

I declared MINGE in front of my parents, but I didn't get any kind of reaction.

Also, does anyone else agree that there may as well have been a sack of potatoes in Andrew Sachs's place? Did he even say anything apart from at the start and in his fast-forward slot? I noticed Susie glancing at him several times as if she was desperate for some kind of contribution.
User avatar
jeff wharton
Rookie
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:28 am
Location: Leicester.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by jeff wharton »

Strangest selection of letters I have ever seen.One round only contained five different letters,one treble and two doubles .In another round there was three Us.I don,t think I have ever seen three Us in the whole of a game before.
Still it was nice to see the show again even though it seems weird without Carol.
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Jimmy Gough »

jeff wharton wrote:Strangest selection of letters I have ever seen.One round only contained five different letters,one treble and two doubles .In another round there was three Us.I don,t think I have ever seen three Us in the whole of a game before.
Still it was nice to see the show again even though it seems weird without Carol.
I wonder if anybody can name a word with 3 U's within 9 letters? I can't.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Jimmy wrote:I wonder if anybody can name a word with 3 U's within 9 letters? I can't.
thought I'd end up finding something starting with UN... but it turned out to be VULTUROUS
Dan Vanniasingham
Enthusiast
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 am
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Dan Vanniasingham »

Jimmy wrote:I wonder if anybody can name a word with 3 U's within 9 letters? I can't.
I can't either, I'll have to give it some thought. Unusually, nobody else has beaten me to this...

Edit: Damn you Matt...
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Jon Corby »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Jimmy wrote:I wonder if anybody can name a word with 3 U's within 9 letters? I can't.
thought I'd end up finding something starting with UN... but it turned out to be VULTUROUS
UNUSUALLY, LUXURIOUS, QUERULOUS, SUCCUBOUS, HUMUNGOUS...
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Matt Morrison »

Jon Corby wrote:UNUSUALLY, LUXURIOUS, QUERULOUS, SUCCUBOUS, HUMUNGOUS...
props for UNUSUALLY and HUMUNGOUS. I doubt UNVACUOUS works but I needed to find an UN of my own :-p
Dan Vanniasingham
Enthusiast
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 am
Location: Enfield, Middlesex
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 14th January- CoC game 3.

Post by Dan Vanniasingham »

My post was too subtle :(

Next time I'll just so straight to the Thread of Brag. :)
Post Reply