Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:32 pm
Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
(100+4)*9/2+1 for a neat method in R9.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
Nice to see the Tory guy losing to LABOURS in round 5.
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
There's IDIOTA in R11...thanks Bradley Horrocks for teaching me this word!
What's up with the Boeing Targets for the Numbers Round lately? We had a 757, aand then a 787!
Did anyone notice Nick did not say "Good Afternoon" immediately which he always does at the very beginning, this is something unusual...
Remembered saying "No..." when Patrick declared ORANGUTAN in the Conundrum, I nearly fell for it too...
What's up with the Boeing Targets for the Numbers Round lately? We had a 757, aand then a 787!
Did anyone notice Nick did not say "Good Afternoon" immediately which he always does at the very beginning, this is something unusual...
Remembered saying "No..." when Patrick declared ORANGUTAN in the Conundrum, I nearly fell for it too...
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
Crap standard of play today.
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
Patrick Murphy is definitely the antithesis of a British Tory as well!Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:55 pm Nice to see the Tory guy losing to LABOURS in round 5.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:55 pm Nice to see the Tory guy losing to LABOURS in round 5.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 46)
"2 good players"
mmm...yeah....
No disrespect intended but it stretches the definition of good a bit...
mmm...yeah....
No disrespect intended but it stretches the definition of good a bit...