Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:27 pm
by Gavin Chipper
DAMNABLE in one of the letters rounds near the end.

Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:59 pm
by Johnny Canuck
Isn't it the 28th? If not, kudos on making it into the future and giving me a hint about tomorrow's offerings.

Was it just me, or was Laurie asking for "constants" today?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:04 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Not quite sure how that happened.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:28 pm
by Neil A Collins
Gavin Chipper wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:27 pm DAMNABLE in one of the letters rounds near the end.
ALBUMEN for 7 in the same round, which I was quite surprised Susie didn't get. I'd have blown it with EARGASM in the previous round though.

Well played by Bradley under pressure at the end.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:00 pm
by Elliott Mellor
Very well played to both today, have to feel a bit sorry for Laurie as he was surely capable of winning a few against easier opponents - to take Bradley almost to a crucial takes some doing.

535 is doable in the 540 6 small round via 107*5.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:37 pm
by Martin Hurst
I only logged on to see how Tom S got on #disappointed

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:04 pm
by Tom S
Martin Hurst wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:37 pm I only logged on to see how Tom S got on #disappointed
Tom S made the fatal error of checking the wiki before watching All4, hence I didn't watch it, whatever happened, seemed that Laurie was a very competent player, and Brad faced a fair bit of pressure today! Only Monday's and Wednesday's are my days off, so will be the only days I post my results :)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 28th November 2017

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:38 pm
by Philip Wilson
Elliott Mellor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:00 pm 535 is doable in the 540 6 small round via 107*5.
So was 539 but after 30 secs: (4 + 1) x (9 + 3) x 9 - 1.
In the first numbers if Bradley had swapped the 5 x 2 with the 10 then multiplying by the 2 would have been near the end and I'd say he would have seen the 1 could be added first.