Page 1 of 1
Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:14 pm
by Gavin Chipper
ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:11 pm
by Elliott Mellor
Method for first nums for the 4 largers:
((100+6)*3*75+50)/25
Well in time as well, though really it's just standard 4l stuff.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:46 pm
by David Williams
CASUIST in one of the early rounds.
And, after what I posted in another thread about learning to do one large,
(100-4) x (5+1) + 3 = 579
as a straightforward contestant beater. Just the 10 points each wasted today.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:42 pm
by Philip Wilson
Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:14 pm
ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it.
Ragwort was available in that round I think.