Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7851
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017

Post by Gavin Chipper » Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:14 pm

ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it.

Elliott Mellor
Acolyte
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017

Post by Elliott Mellor » Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:11 pm

Method for first nums for the 4 largers:
((100+6)*3*75+50)/25
Well in time as well, though really it's just standard 4l stuff.

David Williams
Devotee
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017

Post by David Williams » Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:46 pm

CASUIST in one of the early rounds.

And, after what I posted in another thread about learning to do one large,
(100-4) x (5+1) + 3 = 579
as a straightforward contestant beater. Just the 10 points each wasted today.

Philip Wilson
Enthusiast
Posts: 470
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 1st March 2017

Post by Philip Wilson » Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:42 pm

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:14 pm
ratwig is not valid by the way in case anyone was wondering. It might seem obvious, but they should have been explicit and not put it on the board! You could see Susie seemingly looking it up but she didn't subsequently say anything after Len rambled on about it.
Ragwort was available in that round I think.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest