Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
2nd numbers: (25+6) x (9x4-5) -3
-
- Series 75 Champion
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:50 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
Loving the Joe Lycett dance to the end credits - Susie even tried to join in today (briefly!)
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
1st numbers alternative: 7 * (9 + 4) * 10 + 9 * 1
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
I have trouble believing Susie managed to make this fundamental error: "Yes, same in the plural. It's a mass noun, in other words." Somebody of her standing certainly shouldn't be confusing the two concepts.
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
What was the word? I'm not saying that your nitpicking is wrong, but I can think of plenty of cases where Susie would be right, at least in the obvious sense of common usage.Stewart Gordon wrote:I have trouble believing Susie managed to make this fundamental error: "Yes, same in the plural. It's a mass noun, in other words." Somebody of her standing certainly shouldn't be confusing the two concepts.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
Joe asked if TINSELS would be valid. So TINSEL is the word that Susie was claiming is singular, plural and a mass noun all at the same time. (Which might actually be true of some words, but they would be distinct subcategories of noun to which the word belongs, not ways of saying the same thing.)
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
From the way you originally couched it, that's not the same thing at all. She was taking a shortcut really, wasn't she? Rather than explain the minutae of the mass noun rule and how it may or may not be applied to the word, she was saying that TINSEL in the plural is the same word as TINSEL in the singular. Which is entirely correct in context, as a display consisting of many strands of tinsel would still be referred to as "tinsel", just as a single piece would be.Stewart Gordon wrote:Joe asked if TINSELS would be valid. So TINSEL is the word that Susie was claiming is singular, plural and a mass noun all at the same time. (Which might actually be true of some words, but they would be distinct subcategories of noun to which the word belongs, not ways of saying the same thing.)
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:48 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
You wouldn't speak of "a tinsel" or "five tinsel", therefore it's nonsense. Speaking nonsense in the name of saving time is a false economy.
I'm pretty sure her usual "shortcut" explanation is "you can't pluralise it"....
I'm pretty sure her usual "shortcut" explanation is "you can't pluralise it"....
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
(7x(3+3)+50)x9=838
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
That's 828, and today is 22 November.Peter Mabey wrote:(7x(3+3)+50)x9=838
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
Sorry - saw Tuesday on this thread, so jumped in assuming today - and then posted without checking to get in quickly
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
I'll make a new thread. I haven't done a bulk load in a while.
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
Of course not. You would speak of a strand of tinsel, or five strands of tinsel. And when you had assembled those strands of tinsel, you would refer to the assemblage as "a display of tinsel". I still don't know how else Susie could have handled this one.Stewart Gordon wrote:You wouldn't speak of "a tinsel" or "five tinsel", therefore it's nonsense.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13312
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 25th October 2016
I've just looked up the definition and it says that it's a mass noun, but doesn't mention the plural being the same. So Susie would just say that it's a mass noun. It's possible that she just "mis-spoke" with the plural being the same bit, and moved swiftly onto it being a mass noun afterwards.JimBentley wrote:Of course not. You would speak of a strand of tinsel, or five strands of tinsel. And when you had assembled those strands of tinsel, you would refer to the assemblage as "a display of tinsel". I still don't know how else Susie could have handled this one.Stewart Gordon wrote:You wouldn't speak of "a tinsel" or "five tinsel", therefore it's nonsense.