Countdown demise

All discussion relevant to Countdown that is not too spoilerific. New members: come here first to introduce yourself. We don't bite, or at least rarely.
Post Reply
John friar
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 4:28 pm

Countdown demise

Post by John friar »

Having been a Countdown fan for many years I now find that I have to give it up. Who in their right mind insists on bringing back that very unfunny lady, Jo Brand. The format has to be changed. Get rid of the so called celebrities which seems to consist of out of work second rate magicians, comedianes and other people who are totally out of their depth. As for the origin of words section! You can see Rachel and Nicks eyes glazing over at Suzies drivel. Watching it today I was cringing at some of the stupidity coming out of Jo Brand, even the audience laughter was forced and they were clearly embarrassed. Viewers are leaving in droves and the powers that be, insist on sticking to the same tired format. Shame to see it go, but I wont be back until they change.
User avatar
Jennifer Steadman
Kiloposter
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Kent
Contact:

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Jennifer Steadman »

It's all very well complaining, but what format would you rather see? They have just altered it slightly. Beyond radically changing the format (and almost certainly alienating far more viewers) to some sort of alternative variant, I'm not sure what a better alternative is.

Also, I think you'll find that viewing figures have decreased because the higher powers at C4 insist on pimping the show out to earlier time slots. In any case, they're not as dramatically down as the Daily Mail would have you believe.
"There's leaders, and there's followers, but I'd rather be a dick than a swallower" - Aristotle
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13214
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Some DC guests may be better than others and various aspects of the non-game part of the show might not be to your liking, and by all means moan about them, but if you're primarily watching for the game none of that should stop you watching.
User avatar
Nina Boyd
Rookie
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Huddersfield
Contact:

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Nina Boyd »

If Countdown was just the game, and nothing else, the only people who would watch would be apterites.
I agree that DC gets very tedious, although enthusiasts for words make good guests (GBrandreth).
Jo Brand is very funny, but not on Countdown.
User avatar
Peter Fenton
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:19 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Peter Fenton »

I generally like Jo Brand on Countdown but I admit that the whole making up silly words thing starts to tire if it's done to death like it has the last couple of shows. As Gavin says though, if you're here for the letters and numbers, there's nothing to stop you watching. If you don't like certain sections, you can always reach for the mute button.
Guy Barry
Acolyte
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:12 am

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Guy Barry »

Peter Fenton wrote:I generally like Jo Brand on Countdown but I admit that the whole making up silly words thing starts to tire if it's done to death like it has the last couple of shows.
Some people can pull it off. Richard Stilgoe was excellent at it - but his inventions were always inspired in comparison with most of Jo Brand's offerings. Also they normally used all nine letters (which is at least clever).
Dave Preece
Devotee
Posts: 621
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:50 pm

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Dave Preece »

Jennifer Steadman wrote:It's all very well complaining, but what format would you rather see? They have just altered it slightly. Beyond radically changing the format (and almost certainly alienating far more viewers) to some sort of alternative variant, I'm not sure what a better alternative is.

Also, I think you'll find that viewing figures have decreased because the higher powers at C4 insist on pimping the show out to earlier time slots. In any case, they're not as dramatically down as the Daily Mail would have you believe.
The Daily Mail got their figures from official viewing figures, there is no need to 'make up' figures... the viewing figures have fallen drastically FACT, no embellishment needed to point that out... air times need sorting but the damage has been done.

Unfortunately!
User avatar
Peter Fenton
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:19 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Peter Fenton »

Dave Preece wrote:
Jennifer Steadman wrote:It's all very well complaining, but what format would you rather see? They have just altered it slightly. Beyond radically changing the format (and almost certainly alienating far more viewers) to some sort of alternative variant, I'm not sure what a better alternative is.

Also, I think you'll find that viewing figures have decreased because the higher powers at C4 insist on pimping the show out to earlier time slots. In any case, they're not as dramatically down as the Daily Mail would have you believe.
The Daily Mail got their figures from official viewing figures, there is no need to 'make up' figures... the viewing figures have fallen drastically FACT, no embellishment needed to point that out... air times need sorting but the damage has been done.

Unfortunately!

I don't think anyone's suggesting that the Daily Mail make up the viewing figures. I think what grates some people on this forum is how they take the viewing figures for a single show, compare this to the highest ever viewing figures that Countdown ever got (over 20 years ago when it was on at a sensible time and there were only four channels) and then spin this into a story about how Countdown is about to be axed.

So to say the viewing figures have fallen drastically is a bit of an overstatement. Sure, they're not as high as they once were, but let's not be too dramatic about it. If you take into account the time slot, the number of channels now available and the plethora of quiz shows on afternoon TV nowadays, then I think the viewing figures (over a whole series) are actually holding up rather well.
User avatar
Adam Gillard
Kiloposter
Posts: 1761
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Adam Gillard »

It's interesting to see how often people who frequent this forum, who clearly have some interest in the show, watch it (this includes Sky+ etc.): http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8481.
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U

C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)

Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
Zarte Siempre
Series 78 Champion
Posts: 1344
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:56 pm
Location: Dadford, Buckinghamshire

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Zarte Siempre »

My dear old Mum and I have this sorted perfectly.

Sky+ show ---> watch after dinner ---> fast forward letter choosing ---> Mum reads me the letters so I can write them down ---> Listen to words available ---> Skip guests bit depending on who it is (Gyles Brandreth gone, Dr. Phil good) ---> watch more rounds ---> fight over whether we listen to Susie (I never win, cause my Mum hates her delivery) ---> watch rest of show ---> Watch Mum try and exit Sky+ before Nick can say "You be sure of it"
Possibly the first contestant to accelerate with a mic clipped...
Guy Barry
Acolyte
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:12 am

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Guy Barry »

Zarte Siempre wrote: fast forward letter choosing
Why would you want to do that? That's usually the time when I work out my answer!
Zarte Siempre
Series 78 Champion
Posts: 1344
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:56 pm
Location: Dadford, Buckinghamshire

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Zarte Siempre »

Because there seems to be a trend for taking 3 years between each letter. Tis irritating.
Possibly the first contestant to accelerate with a mic clipped...
Keith Bennett
Acolyte
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:26 am
Location: Kent

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Keith Bennett »

John friar wrote:Having been a Countdown fan for many years I now find that I have to give it up. Who in their right mind insists on bringing back that very unfunny lady, Jo Brand. The format has to be changed. Get rid of the so called celebrities which seems to consist of out of work second rate magicians, comedianes and other people who are totally out of their depth. As for the origin of words section! You can see Rachel and Nicks eyes glazing over at Suzies drivel. Watching it today I was cringing at some of the stupidity coming out of Jo Brand, even the audience laughter was forced and they were clearly embarrassed. Viewers are leaving in droves and the powers that be, insist on sticking to the same tired format. Shame to see it go, but I wont be back until they change.
If I remember rightly when I joined this forum a took a little while to get the account activated. It seems a bit pointless to me to hang around waiting for that to happen just to make a first post telling everybody you are no longer going to watch a programme they didn't know you watched anyway.
Zarte Siempre
Series 78 Champion
Posts: 1344
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:56 pm
Location: Dadford, Buckinghamshire

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Zarte Siempre »

Keith Bennett wrote:
John friar wrote:Having been a Countdown fan for many years I now find that I have to give it up. Who in their right mind insists on bringing back that very unfunny lady, Jo Brand. The format has to be changed. Get rid of the so called celebrities which seems to consist of out of work second rate magicians, comedianes and other people who are totally out of their depth. As for the origin of words section! You can see Rachel and Nicks eyes glazing over at Suzies drivel. Watching it today I was cringing at some of the stupidity coming out of Jo Brand, even the audience laughter was forced and they were clearly embarrassed. Viewers are leaving in droves and the powers that be, insist on sticking to the same tired format. Shame to see it go, but I wont be back until they change.
If I remember rightly when I joined this forum a took a little while to get the account activated. It seems a bit pointless to me to hang around waiting for that to happen just to make a first post telling everybody you are no longer going to watch a programme they didn't know you watched anyway.
Right on!
Possibly the first contestant to accelerate with a mic clipped...
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13214
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Countdown demise

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Zarte Siempre wrote:
Keith Bennett wrote:
John friar wrote:Having been a Countdown fan for many years I now find that I have to give it up. Who in their right mind insists on bringing back that very unfunny lady, Jo Brand. The format has to be changed. Get rid of the so called celebrities which seems to consist of out of work second rate magicians, comedianes and other people who are totally out of their depth. As for the origin of words section! You can see Rachel and Nicks eyes glazing over at Suzies drivel. Watching it today I was cringing at some of the stupidity coming out of Jo Brand, even the audience laughter was forced and they were clearly embarrassed. Viewers are leaving in droves and the powers that be, insist on sticking to the same tired format. Shame to see it go, but I wont be back until they change.
If I remember rightly when I joined this forum a took a little while to get the account activated. It seems a bit pointless to me to hang around waiting for that to happen just to make a first post telling everybody you are no longer going to watch a programme they didn't know you watched anyway.
Right on!
Well yeah but I think it's also interesting to know reasons why people might be stopping watching regardless of whether we knew they did watch or whether they existed.
Post Reply