Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

All discussion relevant to Countdown that is not too spoilerific. New members: come here first to introduce yourself. We don't bite, or at least rarely.
Post Reply

Easiest to get all 8?

Poll ended at Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:39 pm

Kai Laddiman
5
11%
Charlie Reams
0
No votes
Martin Bishop
2
4%
Neil Zussman
4
9%
Kirk Bevins
0
No votes
Cate Henderson
10
21%
Shane Roberts
7
15%
Jimmy Gough
2
4%
Innis Carson
1
2%
Andrew Hulme
16
34%
 
Total votes: 47

User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Michael Wallace »

Hai guyz.

Because everyone is bored (yeah right) of the 'bestest player ever' argument, I thought I'd make a thread out of a recent discussion I've had about which octochamp has had the easiest/hardest set of conundrums. Obviously this calls for a poll! I've only included the last 10 octochamps, because it's a bit much to expect people to remember years back, or have to go through loads of sets (and 10 is a round number), so vote for who you think has the easiest set out of these 10. If you want to add "he's not included but so-and-so had a particularly easy/hard set", then that's cool, but do have a think about the poll as well.

Obviously it's a bit ambiguous what 'hardest' means, so vote for the set which you think is easiest to get all of. I've allowed multiple voting, and re-voting, so if you're unsure you can choose more than one, and even change your mind later. Go go go!

The list, in chronological order:

Kai Laddiman: COPPERING PLUMMETED SUBNORMAL TRICKLING SHODDIEST DECOMPOSE DEFERRING INJECTION

Charlie Reams: INSPECTED BRASSWARE CRUMBLING HAPHAZARD ESTABLISH LIKELIEST NOSEBLEED PERSUADED

Martin Bishop: CHECKLIST EXPLODING INCLUSIVE PROFUSELY SPRINGBOK PUNCHLINE TROUNCING MEMORABLE

Neil Zussman: DEPLETING FRACTURED HAMBURGER OVERTHROW PIPSQUEAK DIAPHRAGM LITERALLY CREEPIEST

Kirk Bevins: FANATICAL MITIGATED RAINSTORM UNDERLING LAMINATED ARTHRITIS CONDENSED FLEDGLING

Cate Henderson: PROLONGED CLOUDIEST BLUBBERED COLLUDING DIRECTIVE NAVIGABLE PURCHASED THRASHING

Shane Roberts: UNDRESSED SATIATING FURNISHED DEADLIEST NUMBSKULL PRETTIEST ANNOUNCER BLUNDERED

Jimmy Gough: PREFIXING FOREIGNER EXCITABLY RECLUSIVE UNLIKABLE TRANSLATE MISTIMING BARBARITY

Innis Carson: MARMALADE VIOLATING STERILISE CROSSWORD DEFLECTED MISFIRING SPONGIEST SAILMAKER

Andrew Hulme: COMMANDER CAPTAINCY GUTTERING HORRIFIED SMELLIEST WARRANTED COMPETING CRANKIEST

(no James Doohan because one of his conundrums (COURTEOUS/OUTSOURCE) was defective)
Last edited by Michael Wallace on Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Mine :oops:
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Innis Carson
Devotee
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Innis Carson »

I went for Cate and Shane because there doesn't seem to be any one conundrum they had that is particularly obscure or hard to spot (like SUBNORMAL or SPRINGBOK).
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by James Robinson »

I went for Innis & Shane's conundrums. I got all of Innis', with the exception of SAILMAKER and Shane's were fairly easy too.

If only I had some of those when I had my run.

My conundrum experience on the show is pretty rubbish compared to when I watch it at home.

I normally miss about 1 every month and get the rest in more or less next to no time, so my show record is really dire.

If you include my 2 shows as a youngster, it's 2 successes, 2 rubbish declarations (I'm being brutally honest about that) and 1 no-hoper.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Michael Wallace »

Some interesting results already. Just thought I'd mention I've changed the poll so it will close in a week.
User avatar
Darren Carter
What a lot of bling
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Darren Carter »

I'm voting for Andrew's conundrums. I hardly ever get any but I remember getting practically all of his.....
Andrew Hulme
Acolyte
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Andrew Hulme »

Me, Jimmy, Cate, Shane all had 8 very gettable ones, so I voted for those four
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Craig Beevers »

Cate basically had 7 very easy ones and a mildly tricky one (NAVIGABLE - false ING but with those letters there's not many plausible combinations), so I'm voted for her. Kirk's probably had the toughest run there, followed by Charlie. Although it does depend on how they were scrambled.
User avatar
Ian Dent
Devotee
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Ian Dent »

Jimmy Gough surely had the most difficult.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Ian Dent wrote:Jimmy Gough surely had the most difficult.
Maybe, but he never waited to find out how hard they were!
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Michael Wallace »

Right then. The poll closed ages ago, so time to see how 'right' you all were.

First off, the order based on votes by the forumites:

1: Andrew Hulme - 16
2: Cate Henderson - 10
3: Shane Roberts - 7
4: Kai Laddiman - 5
5: Neil Zussmann - 4
=6: Martin Bishop - 2
=6: Jimmy Gough - 2
8: Innis Carson - 1
=9: Charlie Reams - 0
=9: Kirk Bevins - 0

So Andrew runs away with a bit, with Cate a distant second and Shane 3rd. Now, if only there were a way of assessing how hard conundrums are, other than through one's own intuition...

Oh wait, there is! Charlie and I have been having lots of fun sifting through all the data apterous gives us, and one of the things it provides us with is a measure of how difficult conundrums are. So we ran the octochamp conundrums through my delicious Difficultyometer, and so can give a more objective ordering of the conundrum sets for each of the champs above. So, from easiest to hardest:

1: Kai Laddiman
2: Neil Zussman
3: Cate Henderson
4: Andrew Hulme
5: Martin Bishop
6: Charlie Reams
7: Jimmy Gough
8: Shane Roberts
9: Kirk Bevins
10: Innis Carson

So there you go. It turns out Andrew and Shane's sets weren't as easy as people thought, with Kai, Neil and Charlie's not as hard. Neat, eh?

Charlie and I have a fair few more things planned for these data than just looking at which octochamps had a hard time in conundrum land, but we thought we'd share this bit of fun. We'll keep you updated if anything else exciting turns up.
Last edited by Michael Wallace on Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Matt Morrison »

So there you go. It turns out Andrew and Shane's sets weren't as easy as people thought, with Kai, Neil and Charlie's harder. (easier?)


Good research. Enjoyed, especially as you made it sound like you and Charlie operate from some sort of sordid evil lair.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Michael Wallace »

Matt Morrison wrote:
So there you go. It turns out Andrew and Shane's sets weren't as easy as people thought, with Kai, Neil and Charlie's harder. (easier?)


Good research. Enjoyed, especially as you made it sound like you and Charlie operate from some sort of sordid evil lair.
Cheers for the correction, edited it. And our evil lair is anything but sordid. Or something.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Charlie Reams »

Our evil lair is actually made out of sorbet, so you were almost right.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Michael Wallace »

Charlie Reams wrote:Our evil lair is actually made out of sorbet, so you were almost right.
Yeah, you wouldn't believe how sticky we get.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Derek Hazell »

Charlie Reams wrote:Our evil lair is actually made out of sorbet, so you were almost right.
These incredibly close muggy days have made me think something that I would never in a million years have thought I would think, but I would like to lick your lair.
Last edited by Derek Hazell on Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Matt Morrison »

Derek Hazell wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:Our evil lair is actually made out of sorbet, so you were almost right.
These incredibly close muggy days have made me think something that I would never in a million years have thought I would think, but I would like to lick you lair.
I don't think Charlie would want you to lick him lair.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Derek Hazell »

Matt Morrison wrote:I don't think Charlie would want you to lick him lair.
I notice you only include Charlie in that. Anyway, ahem, I don't want to get any deeper into this . . . so, in a desperate attempt to get back on topic, Conundrums are only "easy" if you know the word aren't they. To expect Kai to know the word "laserdisc" (which was one of his subsequent Conundrums) when they were becoming obselete around the time he was being born, was a stretch of even the most vivid imagination.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
Simon Myers
Enthusiast
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:41 am
Location: Stamford, Connecticut

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Simon Myers »

Derek Hazell wrote:Conundrums are only "easy" if you know the word aren't they. To expect Kai to know the word "laserdisc" (which was one of his subsequent Conundrums) when they were becoming obselete around the time he was being born, was a stretch of even the most vivid imagination.
Well, not exactly. Especially with compound words one can take an educated guess without necessarily knowing the word. A few examples may include APPLEWOOD, SNAKEBIRD, and SHORTSTOP. Even if we discount compound words, one may take an educated guess using general knowledge of English orthography and spot something like ALTRICIAL despite never having heard of it before.

Conversely, there are plenty of words that everyone knows but are very difficult to spot in conundrum form. For a quick example, ORIGINATE isn't spotted very often despite being a fairly normal word. This is quite possibly because it has lots of red herring affixes like -ING, -TION and INTER-.
User avatar
Neil Zussman
Enthusiast
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Neil Zussman »

Interesting stats, although I'm not overly surprised by the results. I thought I would get more votes to be honest- I mean I solved 6 of them (and should've gotten the other two) so they couldn't have been that hard, clearly.
Innis had the hardest lot, despite having 7 fairly easy ones, just because of Sailmaker, I assume. Is there any chance you could give us some stats on which Octochamp had the best opportunity to get at least 7 right? I would guess Innis will climb the ladder a bit, but I could be wrong.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Michael Wallace »

Neil Zussman wrote:Innis had the hardest lot, despite having 7 fairly easy ones, just because of Sailmaker, I assume.
Interesting that you think the other seven were 'fairly easy'. Whilst SAILMAKER was the hardest (based on my analysis, at any rate), STERILISE, SPONGIEST, MARMALADE and MISFIRING were all pretty tough too.

Surprisingly often 'easy' sounding conundrums turn out to be a lot harder once you're faced with them from the scrambled end (although for some it's easy to see why - SPONGIEST is ostensibly straightforward, but it's got TION and (more importantly) ING as decoy endings).

(Edit: And yeah, can theoretically do 'easiest to get 7' or whatever, just need to get around to double checking some theory first)
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Gavin Chipper »

How were the hardnesses calculated? Was it done on the basis of getting all 8 - so just multiplying 8 numbers together or was it based on how many one would be expected to get?
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Charlie Reams »

Raccoon wrote:vote for the set which you think is easiest to get all of
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Raccoon wrote:vote for the set which you think is easiest to get all of
Yeah yeah, but I meant the thing you and Raccoon did.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Charlie Reams »

Gavin Chipper wrote:Yeah yeah, but I meant the thing you and Raccoon did.
Well we did the same, otherwise it would be a pretty meaningless comparison.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Octochamp Conundrum Difficulty

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:Yeah yeah, but I meant the thing you and Raccoon did.
Well we did the same, otherwise it would be a pretty meaningless comparison.
With you now - I was just being a bit thick.
Post Reply