Oh - are you recording then?Jeffrey Burgin wrote:No idea if he's actually recording or whether mine and Oliver's fellow auditionee Ian is having a bit of fun with me. The first recording back is Monday 7th September, where you'll be able to marvel at my unexplainable bouts of shitness.
Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Did we have fun Jeff?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
When will you be recording/transmitting Ian, since you were at the same audition is Jeff and Ollie?
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
You are mean.
Last edited by Ian Dent on Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Where is mean?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Why are you being so cryptic Ian?
I just want too know when you're recording/transmitting.
I just want too know when you're recording/transmitting.
- Ian Fitzpatrick
- Devotee
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Wimborne, Dorset
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Douglas, you are starting to sound like Jason!
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Ian didn't pass the audition; he thinks you knew that and are taking the mick.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Thanks Kirk for clearing that up, Ian I did not know that but sorry if that's how you felt.
Is their a different pass mark at the auditions for different groups? As in because a lot of young males go on the show they have too score higher at the audition. I can't believe Babs Speak got on the show and Ian failed it...
Is their a different pass mark at the auditions for different groups? As in because a lot of young males go on the show they have too score higher at the audition. I can't believe Babs Speak got on the show and Ian failed it...
- Lesley Hines
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
- Location: Worcester
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
After something of a marathon I'm filming 20th October. It should have been 3rd June, but Jeff got stuck in Dubai when his little one went down with chicken pox and they couldn't fly home (shame). After several false starts it's finally 11:45 on Tue 20/10/09, and I'm cacking my sweet hiney. Any tips, anyone, please?
Lowering the averages since 2009
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates
Yes, enjoy it!
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Be cool. It's fun.Lesley Hines wrote:Any tips, anyone, please?
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates
Still no dates
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates
Try approaching less attractive girls, they're usually more compliant.Oliver Garner wrote:Still no dates
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates
Very cleverCharlie Reams wrote:Try approaching less attractive girls, they're usually more compliant.Oliver Garner wrote:Still no dates
I meant no recording dates.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Speaking from experience, it's not nearly as nerve-wracking as you'd expect it to be, and you barely notice any nerves once you're a couple of rounds in. The production team are great as well, from Jeff and Rachel right down to floor-people etc., and as said before you will genuinely have a cracking time.Lesley Hines wrote:After something of a marathon I'm filming 20th October. It should have been 3rd June, but Jeff got stuck in Dubai when his little one went down with chicken pox and they couldn't fly home (shame). After several false starts it's finally 11:45 on Tue 20/10/09, and I'm cacking my sweet hiney. Any tips, anyone, please?
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Can I see a theme developing here?Jeffrey Burgin wrote:. . . a cracking time.Lesley Hines wrote: . . . my sweet hiney . . .
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Could anyone shed any light on this, as i will be applying at some point over the next year or so after practising some more on Apterous. But as a 23 year old male, if i need to be up to the standard of some of the currant crop of octochamps then there is little point applying if i should be expected, at this stage anyway, of scoring 100+ in every gameDouglas Wilson wrote:
Is their a different pass mark at the auditions for different groups? As in because a lot of young males go on the show they have too score higher at the audition. I can't believe Babs Speak got on the show and Ian failed it...
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
That's ridiculous. Only 3 people in Countdown's history have scored 100+ in every game. You'll notice the people who do well become octochamps - that's because their opponents aren't as good as the top players. Simple. You can be on Countdown if you are reasonable at both letters and numbers games. Usually getting a 7 letter word in most rounds passes you the audition and if you are within 10 (preferably 5 I guess) on the numbers.J.Levison wrote:
Could anyone shed any light on this, as i will be applying at some point over the next year or so after practising some more on Apterous. But as a 23 year old male, if i need to be up to the standard of some of the currant crop of octochamps then there is little point applying if i should be expected, at this stage anyway, of scoring 100+ in every game
- Lesley Hines
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
- Location: Worcester
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Bum bum!Derek Hazell wrote:Can I see a theme developing here?Jeffrey Burgin wrote:. . . a cracking time.Lesley Hines wrote: . . . my sweet hiney . . .
Lowering the averages since 2009
- Sue Sanders
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Whitstable Kent
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I think we arsed for that.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Fool's top.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Since there seems to be a lot of newbies on the forum, who might be getting involved with the show proper, I thought I'd bump this.
Anyone?
Anyone?
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I believe that Jack Worsley is on the last preliminary of the series, that's December 7th.Douglas Wilson wrote:Since there seems to be a lot of newbies on the forum, who might be getting involved with the show proper, I thought I'd bump this.
Anyone?
But, after that, we obviously don't know, since they're not starting the new series til Sunday.
Interesting they're doing that for one day, then the following day they're recording that 8 Out of 10 Cats/Countdown crossover show.
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
That's correct.James Robinson wrote:I believe that Jack Worsley is on the last preliminary of the series, that's December 7th.Douglas Wilson wrote:Since there seems to be a lot of newbies on the forum, who might be getting involved with the show proper, I thought I'd bump this.
Anyone?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Anyone other than Jack in this series?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4547
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Philip jarvis perhaps?Douglas Wilson wrote:Anyone?
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
There are a few I've recently heard of.Douglas Wilson wrote:Anyone?
Chris Butler & Matt Conway have recorded, and Niall Seymour is recording in the next block, I believe.
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4547
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Didn't niall Seymour kick up a stink in the reapplication thread two years ago?James Robinson wrote:Niall Seymour is recording in the next block, I believe.
Hang on, I'm thinking of Douglas wilson here, aren't I?
Aren't I?
- Adam Dexter
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Well I had my audition today.. not too brilliant tbh. Missed the 9's, and only solved 1 numbers game. Reckon I came about 2nd or 3rd out of 6, so will be waiting - not too hopefully - for the letter. There's always next time I guess
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon
We're off to button moon
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
When I went for audition, they said most people get on the show, so 2nd or 3rd of 6 should definitely be enough. I also missed all three 9s at my audition along with the other 7 people there.Adam Dexter wrote:Well I had my audition today.. not too brilliant tbh. Missed the 9's, and only solved 1 numbers game. Reckon I came about 2nd or 3rd out of 6, so will be waiting - not too hopefully - for the letter. There's always next time I guess
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I had my audition last Tuesday. Didn't get through due to too many silly mistakes. I didn't deserve to get on given my performance but it's annoying as I'm better than many that do get on! I'll try again.
Niall Seymour and Kieran Bray filmed yesterday I believe.
Niall Seymour and Kieran Bray filmed yesterday I believe.
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
It is annoying what nerves can do to performance, Chris.Chris Marshall wrote:I had my audition last Tuesday. Didn't get through due to too many silly mistakes. I didn't deserve to get on given my performance but it's annoying as I'm better than many that do get on! I'll try again.
Niall Seymour and Kieran Bray filmed yesterday I believe.
You've played some good games on apterous. I hope you pass your next audition.
Looking forward to seeing Niall and Keiran on.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
What standard is roughly the benchmark for getting on the show? I get mainly 6's and 7's and home and get the odd 8 or 9 as well. I am thinking of sending away my application form to get on the show, also when they ask for a photo for the application form what should it be? I know some ask for a passport photo and some ask for you doing something interesting, what is most likely to get me noticed? Any help from anyone who has 'been there and got the t-shirt' would be much appreciated .
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I wouldn't worry about any of that. Just attach a photo. You really don't have to get noticed or anything. I was really nervous about my audition because I hate the whole "tell us about yourself" thing that you always do on training courses etc - and there was none of it. You play the game, and that's it. It sounds like you're more than ready as well, but it depends I suppose on how well you want to do/think you can do against how much better you could get with some practice if you can be arsed.David Barnard wrote:What standard is roughly the benchmark for getting on the show? I get mainly 6's and 7's and home and get the odd 8 or 9 as well. I am thinking of sending away my application form to get on the show, also when they ask for a photo for the application form what should it be? I know some ask for a passport photo and some ask for you doing something interesting, what is most likely to get me noticed? Any help from anyone who has 'been there and got the t-shirt' would be much appreciated .
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I also suppose its how I hold my nerve in the auditions I have never done that sort of thing, I think I have got what it takes but just the teapot would be nice. Thanks for the advice though Jon.Jon Corby wrote:I wouldn't worry about any of that. Just attach a photo. You really don't have to get noticed or anything. I was really nervous about my audition because I hate the whole "tell us about yourself" thing that you always do on training courses etc - and there was none of it. You play the game, and that's it. It sounds like you're more than ready as well, but it depends I suppose on how well you want to do/think you can do against how much better you could get with some practice if you can be arsed.David Barnard wrote:What standard is roughly the benchmark for getting on the show? I get mainly 6's and 7's and home and get the odd 8 or 9 as well. I am thinking of sending away my application form to get on the show, also when they ask for a photo for the application form what should it be? I know some ask for a passport photo and some ask for you doing something interesting, what is most likely to get me noticed? Any help from anyone who has 'been there and got the t-shirt' would be much appreciated .
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Good advice there from Jon. It's also worth noting that if you fail at an audition, you can apply again - I think you get 3 attempts, unless the rules have changed recently. So you needn't feel too nervous at the first one.David Barnard wrote:I also suppose its how I hold my nerve in the auditions I have never done that sort of thing, I think I have got what it takes but just the teapot would be nice. Thanks for the advice though Jon.Jon Corby wrote:I wouldn't worry about any of that. Just attach a photo. You really don't have to get noticed or anything. I was really nervous about my audition because I hate the whole "tell us about yourself" thing that you always do on training courses etc - and there was none of it. You play the game, and that's it. It sounds like you're more than ready as well, but it depends I suppose on how well you want to do/think you can do against how much better you could get with some practice if you can be arsed.David Barnard wrote:What standard is roughly the benchmark for getting on the show? I get mainly 6's and 7's and home and get the odd 8 or 9 as well. I am thinking of sending away my application form to get on the show, also when they ask for a photo for the application form what should it be? I know some ask for a passport photo and some ask for you doing something interesting, what is most likely to get me noticed? Any help from anyone who has 'been there and got the t-shirt' would be much appreciated .
If you did want to practice to improve first, then there's always http://apterous.org/index.php
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I attached a passport photo in which I looked reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally miserable, and used it as a means to make a rather half-arsed joke about how I don't always look that miserable. It's a passport sized box on the form, so I guess a passport photo is assumed. I doubt they care though. The vetting procedure for Countdown is basically non-existent, and what people look like is a complete non-factor.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Cheers Mark, I bet they were glad they accepted you as we got 10 shows of pure entertainment.Mark Deeks wrote:I attached a passport photo in which I looked reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally miserable, and used it as a means to make a rather half-arsed joke about how I don't always look that miserable. It's a passport sized box on the form, so I guess a passport photo is assumed. I doubt they care though. The vetting procedure for Countdown is basically non-existent, and what people look like is a complete non-factor.
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
11 shows wasn't it?David Barnard wrote:I bet they were glad they accepted you as we got 10 shows of pure entertainment.
Edit: Oh.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Hold up. Damian wouldn't let me on because at the time I'd "played 4000 games on apterous, which creates a skill imbalance compared to the average armchair fan who plays along with 100 or 200 shows a year".Chris Marshall wrote: Niall Seymour and Kieran Bray filmed yesterday I believe.
Niall's a quality player and has 3300 under his belt (let's say 3000 at time of applying?) and been around a lot longer than I have. Can't help but feel a tiny bit hard done to there.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Niall's rating 1295
Your rating 1661
With all due respect to Niall, it's nothing to do with how many games you've played.
Your rating 1661
With all due respect to Niall, it's nothing to do with how many games you've played.
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Wow, I don't think I knew that somebody had actually got a firm "no" for being too good. Do you think you can you apply again? What if you allow yourself to get worse?
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4547
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Wait a second, you've been completely barred from going on? Not told 'yes, but you'll have to wait a bit whilst we get a few more apterites out of the way first'?Andy Platt wrote:Hold up. Damian wouldn't let me on because at the time I'd "played 4000 games on apterous, which creates a skill imbalance compared to the average armchair fan who plays along with 100 or 200 shows a year".Chris Marshall wrote: Niall Seymour and Kieran Bray filmed yesterday I believe.
This is possibly the lamest thing I've ever heard, since Countdown is- was- the only show nowadays that selected players purely based on skill. Then again, this is Damian Eadie we're talking about.
This should be a lesson to all people planning on practising on apterous before going on the show- FOR THE LOVE OF KIRK, USE A PSEUDONYM.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Nah not completely barred- told to try again in 12 months and see "what the situation is" then, bit like Josh H was I guess, but I'm really not hopeful.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Fuck I miss Ben.
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
It makes sense to not have too many contestants in one series of the standard to possibly be a series winner. As has been previously mentioned, they already space out those who do exceptionally well in the auditions.
I would hope that this apterites 'rule' wouldn't affect more average players. I'm not sure I approve of encouraging players to use pseudonyms. Charlie used to say 'real names only' on apterous, but some of the daft usernames appearing recently can't be real! Still, I no longer play newbies after my second experience of rather dodgy banter in game chat.
I would hope that this apterites 'rule' wouldn't affect more average players. I'm not sure I approve of encouraging players to use pseudonyms. Charlie used to say 'real names only' on apterous, but some of the daft usernames appearing recently can't be real! Still, I no longer play newbies after my second experience of rather dodgy banter in game chat.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Innis Carson
- Devotee
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
They need to at least warn potential contestants if they're going impose such a counter-intuitive "no apterites who have played X games" rule. If someone is enough of a fan of Countdown to want to be on it, there's a pretty good chance they'll look for Countdown websites and stumble upon apterous, and once there they're surely far more likely to think "I should play lots of games to get better and increase my chances of getting on the show" than "I better not play lots of games because then I might be rejected for being too good". As it stands, they're only punishing enthusiasm rather than skill/social awkwardness/whatever they think they're punishing.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
This. Plus you know everyone who goes on with at least a smidgeon of ambition will be practicing somewhere somehow.Innis Carson wrote:They need to at least warn potential contestants if they're going impose such a counter-intuitive "no apterites who have played X games" rule. If someone is enough of a fan of Countdown to want to be on it, there's a pretty good chance they'll look for Countdown websites and stumble upon apterous, and once there they're surely far more likely to think "I should play lots of games to get better and increase my chances of getting on the show" than "I better not play lots of games because then I might be rejected for being too good". As it stands, they're only punishing enthusiasm rather than skill/social awkwardness/whatever they think they're punishing.
One fair point is that in the last series the demographic of the finals was very well balanced. Graeme/Mark/Paul/Carl, standard kind of 20-35 guys, Nikki and Jayne there too, representing domestic goddesses everywhere, and Dave & Dave flying the flag for the over 50s. It would kind of suck from a viewer perspective to have 8 guys between 18 and 30 in the finals and that's what Damian is trying to avoid, I think. He told me in our e-mails that one of the complaints about the show that people have is when 'online fanatics' roll the average armchair fans over by 115-40 or some such, and I do agree to some extent - I guess it's better TV when it's a close game. However, the most enjoyable game of last series was Deeks-Butcher (perhaps most would probably argue Cole-Williams just for the epic finale... but the point remains). That wasn't exactly close. It was just great entertainment from Mark/Jeff/Rachel topped with some quality words from Mark. If every show was like that, the ratings would be crazy high. Now, I'm not as clever, nor as funny as Mark, but I'd damn well give it a go, and that's what the show's about for me. It does kind of annoy me when some quiet guy with no personality goes on and loses comfortably first game, bringing pretty much nothing to the show.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I don't necessarily agree with artificially limiting the number of apterites in a series, and I think Countdown's long tradition of valuing skill over other factors in the audition is important and something that makes the show unique, but I can understand the reasoning behind it if it's actually started to discourage people from applying. I don't think Damian makes these decisions through any dislike of Andy or apterites in general, but only in what he perceives to be the best interests of the show. He, better than anyone here, knows what viewers complain about, what they praise the show about, why they watch and why they turn off. So although I don't like the idea of turning someone down, even temporarily, for being too good, it is apparently a necessary evil.
While on the surface it seems nasty, how many other game shows would have their series producer email the applicant personally to explain the decision, and enter into a discussion about it? From what I've heard of other game shows you're lucky if you get any kind of response from anyone at all if your application is declined.
I don't think it's a "ban on apterites rated over X" or a "ban on apterites who have played over Y games", either. Rather, I think the motive is not to eliminate high-standard apterites from the show completely, but merely to prevent there being a new all-conquering lexonerd every other week. When such a high standard becomes the norm, people watching at home are going to stop thinking "wow, this player really stands out, they're really good" and start thinking "yawn, I can't compete at this any more". The winner-stays-on format doesn't help; you only need six excellent players in a 110-episode series for half the shows to feature one. Two or three in a series though, that gives the casual viewer a better chance of watching a game they can compete in.
I really don't think Andy or any other apterite is being permanently excluded, and I'd struggle to understand why that would be a good idea anyway. When I applied (albeit eleven months ago now), I, like Andy, was rated about 1600 and I must have played over 2000 games. The Countdown team obviously keep tabs on apterous for likely applicants, so they must have known this or could find it out. Yet they still called me within two hours of receiving my application to offer me a phone audition. For a more recent example, look at Jack Worsley. Another excellent player, getting a higher octotototototal than I did, and he was accepted. Their issue isn't with high-standard players competing, it's with there being too many in a series.
That's why I think Andy should take Damian up on his offer to apply again at the end of the year. I hope he does get on some time in 2013, and I look forward to seeing him play. Until then, I motion that Andy's posting rank on the forum is changed from "Rookie" to "Too Awesome For Countdown".
While on the surface it seems nasty, how many other game shows would have their series producer email the applicant personally to explain the decision, and enter into a discussion about it? From what I've heard of other game shows you're lucky if you get any kind of response from anyone at all if your application is declined.
I don't think it's a "ban on apterites rated over X" or a "ban on apterites who have played over Y games", either. Rather, I think the motive is not to eliminate high-standard apterites from the show completely, but merely to prevent there being a new all-conquering lexonerd every other week. When such a high standard becomes the norm, people watching at home are going to stop thinking "wow, this player really stands out, they're really good" and start thinking "yawn, I can't compete at this any more". The winner-stays-on format doesn't help; you only need six excellent players in a 110-episode series for half the shows to feature one. Two or three in a series though, that gives the casual viewer a better chance of watching a game they can compete in.
I really don't think Andy or any other apterite is being permanently excluded, and I'd struggle to understand why that would be a good idea anyway. When I applied (albeit eleven months ago now), I, like Andy, was rated about 1600 and I must have played over 2000 games. The Countdown team obviously keep tabs on apterous for likely applicants, so they must have known this or could find it out. Yet they still called me within two hours of receiving my application to offer me a phone audition. For a more recent example, look at Jack Worsley. Another excellent player, getting a higher octotototototal than I did, and he was accepted. Their issue isn't with high-standard players competing, it's with there being too many in a series.
That's why I think Andy should take Damian up on his offer to apply again at the end of the year. I hope he does get on some time in 2013, and I look forward to seeing him play. Until then, I motion that Andy's posting rank on the forum is changed from "Rookie" to "Too Awesome For Countdown".
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13307
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
But it depends on whether Andy or Josh just happened to apply when a lot of other Apterites did, or whether it was just an average amount. If Damian only wants x Apterites a series when say x+2 are applying each time, it's not a case of spreading them out, but turning them away.Julie T wrote:It makes sense to not have too many contestants in one series of the standard to possibly be a series winner.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
It seems like a pretty untenable situation. Either you let people on purely on skill, or you cherry pick for TV purposes. Using apterous as a way to identify people who are likely to be 'too good' will just lead to even more people playing under pseudonyms and the 'problem' (of too many good players) persisting.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Fair.Graeme Cole wrote:I don't necessarily agree with artificially limiting the number of apterites in a series, and I think Countdown's long tradition of valuing skill over other factors in the audition is important and something that makes the show unique, but I can understand the reasoning behind it if it's actually started to discourage people from applying. I don't think Damian makes these decisions through any dislike of Andy or apterites in general, but only in what he perceives to be the best interests of the show. He, better than anyone here, knows what viewers complain about, what they praise the show about, why they watch and why they turn off. So although I don't like the idea of turning someone down, even temporarily, for being too good, it is apparently a necessary evil.
While on the surface it seems nasty, how many other game shows would have their series producer email the applicant personally to explain the decision, and enter into a discussion about it? From what I've heard of other game shows you're lucky if you get any kind of response from anyone at all if your application is declined.
I don't think it's a "ban on apterites rated over X" or a "ban on apterites who have played over Y games", either. Rather, I think the motive is not to eliminate high-standard apterites from the show completely, but merely to prevent there being a new all-conquering lexonerd every other week. When such a high standard becomes the norm, people watching at home are going to stop thinking "wow, this player really stands out, they're really good" and start thinking "yawn, I can't compete at this any more". The winner-stays-on format doesn't help; you only need six excellent players in a 110-episode series for half the shows to feature one. Two or three in a series though, that gives the casual viewer a better chance of watching a game they can compete in.
I really don't think Andy or any other apterite is being permanently excluded, and I'd struggle to understand why that would be a good idea anyway. When I applied (albeit eleven months ago now), I, like Andy, was rated about 1600 and I must have played over 2000 games. The Countdown team obviously keep tabs on apterous for likely applicants, so they must have known this or could find it out. Yet they still called me within two hours of receiving my application to offer me a phone audition. For a more recent example, look at Jack Worsley. Another excellent player, getting a higher octotototototal than I did, and he was accepted. Their issue isn't with high-standard players competing, it's with there being too many in a series.
I think the thing was with Jack that he was about 1200 when he applied - he's just a lot younger and cleverer than most of us, thus improves faster. Could easily be 1900-2000 by finals. Damian told me that he doesn't really mind a load of 1200 rated apterous players going on because they are kind of normal standard for countdown.
Lol. Cheers. I think a lot of people think I'm better than I actually am, though.Graeme Cole wrote:That's why I think Andy should take Damian up on his offer to apply again at the end of the year. I hope he does get on some time in 2013, and I look forward to seeing him play. Until then, I motion that Andy's posting rank on the forum is changed from "Rookie" to "Too Awesome For Countdown".
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
Should have been 11 if it wasn't for Carl '900' WilliamsRyan Taylor wrote:11 shows wasn't it?David Barnard wrote:I bet they were glad they accepted you as we got 10 shows of pure entertainment.
Edit: Oh.
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
David Barnard wrote:Should have been 11 if it wasn't for Carl '900' WilliamsRyan Taylor wrote:11 shows wasn't it?David Barnard wrote:I bet they were glad they accepted you as we got 10 shows of pure entertainment.
Edit: Oh.
- Jennifer Steadman
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:34 pm
- Location: Kent
- Contact:
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I'd be interested to know whether the Apterite ban covers just a certain demographic of player. Virtually all of the 1600+ rated players on Apterous are men under the age of 30, so would Andy's audition have been procrastinated if he were female or a pensioner (or a female pensioner) with the same rating and number of games played? I wonder.
"There's leaders, and there's followers, but I'd rather be a dick than a swallower" - Aristotle
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I imagine going on the same logic, it would be easier for a good 50+ player or female to get on, as the armchair viewer could more easily associate themselves with that sort of player.
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Post your audition/filming/transmission dates here
I admit to not watching Countdown much before going on it. I watched the whole of series 64, the back end of 63, used to watch it in the late 90's when getting home from school, and had a bit of a phase during the Des O'Connor era. Never did I watch regularly, though.
When I did, I always used think, I could win that bugger. Not the series, but a show. For the most part, playing along at home, I could win on normal words without all the bullshitty Apto stuff that I have no idea what it meant. It was part of the attraction of winning and definitely the attraction of applying. Only after applying did I practice anything.
If they lose that element, they lose the audience and the applicants. So I understand it. But I don't think this new policy ought to last too long. After all, how many high-standard Apterites actually applied to go on this year anyway? Who's left that hasn't been on? Most of the elite calibre Aptos have been on, or don't want to go on. I think that stretch of series from, what was it, 60 to 64 or something, of a talent level never previously seen on Countdown, isn't going to happen again. That was a brief bottleneck and it's passed now. I think there were 14 Apterites in series 65, but only one - Graeme - was a high calibre Apto before he went on. The rest of us got better after we applied, but Graeme was the only 1500 hundred and upwards. Who else was turned away? Josh was turned away, but it wasn't for 65 I don't think - what, therefore, was the problem?
Turning people away might avoid having a QF lineup like in series 63, if that's their aim, but I don't think there's much risk of that any more anyway.
When I did, I always used think, I could win that bugger. Not the series, but a show. For the most part, playing along at home, I could win on normal words without all the bullshitty Apto stuff that I have no idea what it meant. It was part of the attraction of winning and definitely the attraction of applying. Only after applying did I practice anything.
If they lose that element, they lose the audience and the applicants. So I understand it. But I don't think this new policy ought to last too long. After all, how many high-standard Apterites actually applied to go on this year anyway? Who's left that hasn't been on? Most of the elite calibre Aptos have been on, or don't want to go on. I think that stretch of series from, what was it, 60 to 64 or something, of a talent level never previously seen on Countdown, isn't going to happen again. That was a brief bottleneck and it's passed now. I think there were 14 Apterites in series 65, but only one - Graeme - was a high calibre Apto before he went on. The rest of us got better after we applied, but Graeme was the only 1500 hundred and upwards. Who else was turned away? Josh was turned away, but it wasn't for 65 I don't think - what, therefore, was the problem?
Turning people away might avoid having a QF lineup like in series 63, if that's their aim, but I don't think there's much risk of that any more anyway.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark