Spinning Around

Cerebral distractions of every kind, mostly but not exclusively Countdown-related.

Moderator: Michael Wallace

Post Reply
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Spinning Around

Post by Paul Howe »

Here's a puzzle that's not very difficult, but most people find the solution surprising. It comes in two parts:

i) Everyone knows there are 365 days in a year. Well, actually it's more like 365 1/4 days which is why we need leap years, but to make things simpler we'll assume that a year is exactly 365 days. How many times does the Earth rotate around its own axis in a year? To answer this, you'll need to know that the Earth rotates around its own axis in the same direction as the Earth orbits the sun.
ii) Now assume that the Earth rotates around its own axis the same number of times as in part (i), but in the opposite direction. How many days are there in a year now?

Please no googling, no answering if you've seen it before, and include an explanation with your answer!
Last edited by Paul Howe on Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

I thought there were 365 days in a year regardless.

What has this turned into? An analytical section of the forum?
Richard_Brittain
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm

Post by Richard_Brittain »

.
Last edited by Richard_Brittain on Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Craig Beevers »

This is just for i)

364 times?

If you imagine the earth in 2 dimensions at 3 o'clock to the sun, then at 6 o'clock to the sun. At 3 o'clock the left side of the earth faces the sun, at 6 o'clock it's the top side. So you've effectively gained an extra 1/4 of a rotation there (as the moving around the sun and the earth spinning is the same direction). So throughout a year you'll get an extra full rotation, so that leaves another 364 to make up the full 365.

I hope.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

Oh.

I forgot about leap years.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Paul Howe »

Craig, it's not 364, but you're reasoning along the right lines.

Jason, this has nothing to do with leap years, they're just a human timekeeping device, not an astronomical phenomenon. I've edited the original post to make this clearer.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

Thank you

You all must have very interesting imaginations.
Richard_Brittain
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm

Post by Richard_Brittain »

.
Last edited by Richard_Brittain on Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Charlie Reams »

Richard Brittain wrote:it is a mere technical quango
I'm not sure that word means what you think it means...
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

And this has nothing to do with leap years!

Amazing!
Richard_Brittain
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm

Post by Richard_Brittain »

.
Last edited by Richard_Brittain on Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

I'm not sure what this section of the forum is turning into.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13194
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Richard_Brittain wrote:OK, well according to Craig's logic the answer is probably 366. But I still wouldn't count the Earth's orbit around the Sun as an extra rotation. Pedantically speaking, yes, but surely it has no actual relation to reality. Also, the question asked, 'How many times does the Earth rotate around its own axis in a year?' which confuses things further. The normal 365 rotations of the Earth are about its axis, but is this extra one? For all practical intents and purposes, this extra 'rotation' is completely meaningless, it is a mere technical quango. I will, however, admit that it makes for a good puzzle to confuse people. Good one.
If there Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then it would be like having one day. Rotating clockwise has the effect of reducing the number of days (try it with one hand going round the other - assuming you have an above average number of hands). So to get 365 days, it would have to rotate 366 times, so I agree with you.

Then if it spun the other way, it must be increasing the number of days by one, so 366 rotations gives you 367 days.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

We're all still here. That's a good thing. If we weren't, there would be no Countdown.
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Howard Somerset »

It's 366.

The earth rotates on its axis once every 23 hours and approx 56 minutes. It needs the extra 4 minutes to continue rotating so that the Sun is in approximately the same place relative to it's apparent position on the previous day. All of those 4 minute chunks add up to an extra 24 hours, so we rotate one more time in a year than there are days in a year.

The 23 hours and approx 56 minutes is the Sidereal Day, a term which came up in Countdown only a few days ago.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Paul Howe »

Richard_Brittain wrote:OK, well according to Craig's logic the answer is probably 366. But I
still wouldn't count the Earth's orbit around the Sun as an extra
rotation. Pedantically speaking, yes, but surely it has no actual
relation to reality. Also, the question asked, 'How many times does the
Earth rotate around its own axis in a year?' which confuses
things further. The normal 365 rotations of the Earth are about its
axis, but is this extra one? For all practical intents and purposes,
this extra 'rotation' is completely meaningless, it is a mere technical
quango. I will, however, admit that it makes for a good puzzle to
confuse people. Good one.
Yes, the answer is 366, but no I'm not counting the Earth's orbit around the sun as an extra orbit. I'm not sure you've understood what Craig was saying at all.
Gevin-Gavin wrote:
If there
Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then it would be like
having one day. Rotating clockwise has the effect of reducing the
number of days (try it with one hand going round the other - assuming
you have an above average number of hands). So to get 365 days, it
would have to rotate 366 times, so I agree with you.

Then if it spun the other way, it must be increasing the number of days by one, so 366 rotations gives you 367 days.
Right on both counts, and pretty well explained too. I've drawn a rather nice diagram to illustrate all this, but typically my scanner's packed in. Another good way to think of it is what if the Earth had no days at all? It would have to rotate once during a year to keep the same bit of the Earth facing the sun. I think it's kind of cool that if someone were to set the Earth spinning at the same rate but in the opposite direction, our year would be two days longer!
Howard Somerset wrote:It's 366.

The earth rotates on its axis once every 23 hours and
approx 56 minutes. It needs the extra 4 minutes to continue rotating so
that the Sun is in approximately the same place relative to it's
apparent position on the previous day. All of those 4 minute chunks add
up to an extra 24 hours, so we rotate one more time in a year than
there are days in a year.

The 23 hours and approx 56 minutes is the Sidereal Day, a term which came up in Countdown only a few days ago.
Yes, that about sums it up, although methinks you may have seen this before ;)
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Howard Somerset »

Paul Howe wrote:Yes, that about sums it up, although methinks you may have seen this before ;)
Well, it's one of the many things that have interested me ever since I came across a young Patrick Moore, some years before he started his Sky at Night TV prog.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4544
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Paul Howe »

Haha, I was just going to post that Jono. Also, if Patrick Moore can get to Mars on his rocket powered xylophone, just landing on the moon seems a pretty simple thing in comparison.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13194
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Howard Somerset wrote:
Paul Howe wrote:Yes, that about sums it up, although methinks you may have seen this before ;)
Well, it's one of the many things that have interested me ever since I came across a young Patrick Moore, some years before he started his Sky at Night TV prog.
He's been doing that for 50 years! When was this?! Presumably when he was solely the Gamesmaster. :mrgreen:
That's just weird.
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jason Larsen »

Who came up with this philosophy?
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Howard Somerset »

Gevin-Gavin wrote:He's been doing that for 50 years! When was this?! Presumably when he was solely the Gamesmaster. :mrgreen:
It was in the early 1950s. The first book I ever borrowed from my school library was one of Patrick Moore's first books. It concerned the subject which he still says interests him the most - the moon. I was then interested to learn that he was starting his series Sky At Night, but was unable to see it for a few years because our family didn't get tv until some years later.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Gevin-Gavin wrote:
If there Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then
I just had to quote Gevin-Gavin and correct him - you mean "its" not "it's" don't you! And why "there" and not "the"? :)
User avatar
M. George Quinn
Acolyte
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Spinning Around

Post by M. George Quinn »

"It's"
That one confuses me. If your cat is neutered can you say "it's tail"?
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13194
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Gevin-Gavin wrote:
If there Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then
I just had to quote Gevin-Gavin and correct him - you mean "its" not "it's" don't you! And why "there" and not "the"? :)
"there" instead of "the" is less embarrassing than the other one, because no-one would ever think that you would not know the difference. But I can assure you that it was just carelessness and not lack of knowledge.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13194
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Gavin Chipper »

M. George Quinn wrote:"It's"
That one confuses me. If your cat is neutered can you say "it's tail"?
Only if it is tail. Is it?
User avatar
M. George Quinn
Acolyte
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Spinning Around

Post by M. George Quinn »

No, but it's an it.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13194
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Gavin Chipper »

M. George Quinn wrote:No, but it's an it.
And the tail of it would be its tail (unlike the way I described the Earth's axis). But then if you named it "it"...
User avatar
M. George Quinn
Acolyte
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Spinning Around

Post by M. George Quinn »

Wahey, we got there eventually.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4544
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Basically yeah, 'its' is an exception to the rule, stupidly.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Charlie Reams »

No, all pronouns work that way. You don't write "hi's" or "her's" so "its" behaves consistently.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4544
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Pronouns are an exception to the rule, stupidly.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Ginger Jono wrote:Pronouns are an exception to the rule, stupidly.
haha
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13194
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spinning Around

Post by Gavin Chipper »

A follow-up was made to this.
Post Reply